Posted on 12/11/2006 10:13:29 PM PST by TheBigB
SEATAC, Wash. — The Christmas trees are going back up at Seattle-Tacoma International Airport.
Port of Seattle officials had ordered the trees taken down over the weekend after a local rabbi threatened a lawsuit if a menorah wasn't also displayed at the airport.
Airport officials say they took that action out of concern that if they allowed the addition of a menorah, they would also have to display symbols of other religions and cultures, which was not something airport workers had time for during the busiest travel season of the year.
Rabbi Elazar Bogomilsky says he never asked that the trees be taken down, and the threat of a lawsuit was withdrawn.
With the threat of the lawsuit gone, airport spokesman Bob Parker says all 14 trees will go back up -- hopefully by tomorrow morning.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
I'm glad it happened too. It has shown just how much it matters to most Americans to celebrate Christmas, even in one of the most liberal of our cities!
Amen to that!
I have not been part of any of these threads (until now), and if I had been, I would have stood up against those who said the kinds of things you quoted.
Anyone who hates this Rabbi knows nothing about Jesus Christ. There are many naming His Name who don't know Him, Sabra.
Yes, that came first.
But that counsel is exonerated from blame.
That all falls on the Jew and his Jew lawyer.
(I should add- From some quarters).
The Federal Holiday we're celebrating is Christmas, not Chanuka.
Well that's appropriate since the tree is a pagan symbol, anyway. Still I do love the trees. Was listening to my former Pastor on the radio last week and he was responding to a question from a listener on how appropriate it is for a real Christian to put up the pagan symbol of the Christmas tree. He said he argues with his wife every year they ought not to be putting those things up....and...obviously he is the KING in his castle (having his wife's permission to say so) and there is not only one tree in the home...but multiple trees! He justifies it by saying that yes the tree is a pagan symbol but has become so inextricably connected to the Christian season so as to become benign. Besides...they're beautiful and surely the birth of the saviour is a beautiful event. My pastor has a web site if you're curious. He's rather well known. KEY LIFE And while we're at it....RAPTURE READY?
As you noted the practitioners of that religion are jerks. Apparently their jerkiness came out on seeing the Holiday Trees, which they misinterprited as having something to do with Christmas.
I keep repeating over and over again that the USSC has already ruled on Christmas trees. They are considered SECULAR symbols unless featured in a religious display....ie: the nativity scene.
Good one. Here's another:
What is the origin of the word "holiday"?
• Holly day: a day when people decorate with holly.
• Holiday: a day when people say "Holl with work; I'm outa here."
• Holy day: a day when people celebrate an event of religious significance.
Based on Sea-Tacs statements, they're Holdiay Trees, they're very old, you'll be seeing snowmen and snowflakes. Per Sea-Tac's spokesperson
“I suspect you’ll be seeing a lot of snowmen and snowflakes,”
Based on Sea-Tacs statements, they're Holdiay Trees, they're very old, you'll be seeing snowmen and snowflakes. Per Sea-Tac's spokesperson
“I suspect you’ll be seeing a lot of snowmen and snowflakes,”
If I can't have my Golden Bull - do you realize how much those things cost? - then I'm gonna sue.
Sabramerican's is a bizarre fantasy of ignorance.
The display of non-religiously decorated trees at Christmas is not a religious display per the Supreme Court.
The Rabbi had no standing for legal action, but it would have cost a couple grand for Seatac to find this out (and he could have proceeded anyway though he was going to lose). Also there were PR and political problems. For a hundred bucks the maintenance crew could make all the problem go away.
The display of the menorah or other religious symbol has to be done in a way that doesn't cross the Supreme Court's lunatic 'Lemon Test'.
Which leads to all sorts of complications...
Yes it would as you know.
They are a separate and distinct people, no insult intended. The Scriptures tell me so, and they have been such since time began, they are God's chosen. Who's their biggest supporters? Once again everyone, Christians--who understand them more than anyone else, providing they have read/studied their Scriptures, studied the word and understand their place. We (Christians) are the grafted branch, that hasn't changed.
And, as I once asked a dear friend, who happens to be a Jew, "How can I understand you people??!! (in exasperation)" and he laughed, put his arm around my shoulders and said, "Keep trying--I love it!". He isn't so thin skinned...
When people want to get emotional they don't want any facts.
Why bother, when your screen name is so hilarious? :-D
I can show you thousands of posts and reams of media attention which seem to indicate that the "Holiday Trees" do in fact have a religious component. Despite what Sea-Tac says. You and Sea-Tac contend that in this circumstance they're not at all religious. Perhaps a court would agree with you, but I doubt it. That said, it's a silly controversy. Holiday Trees are Christmas Trees, and Christmas Trees have a religious connotation to most people. They see them and think of Christmas. Which is a religious holiday.
Can you point me to several cases where "Holiday Trees" were displayed, other religous symbols, were specifically barred, and the courts said "fine"?
Christmas Trees are associated with Christmas, what's wrong with recognizing that?
About time! Chalk up another one for Christ the Lord!
WOOT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.