Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What the “conservative” useful idiots have brought us: Week one.
January 8, 2007 | self

Posted on 01/08/2007 8:42:14 AM PST by jmaroneps37

The last election told us many things. One thing that stands out above all others is that the number of people who actually understand what is going on in our country today is frighteningly small.

A small group who “get it”

Just half of Americans are registered to vote, so right off, we know that half of America doesn’t care what happens to itself or the rest of us. They live in a different world. You know who they are so it is not necessary to expand on this point.

Of those who are registered, on a good Election Day, sixty percent vote. That means that only thirty percent of Americans are heard, and even a large percentage of them are ill informed or willfully blinding themselves, even as they cast their ballots.

Of this thirty percent, about fifty percent vote Democrat and by doing so show us they do not understand that the Democrats are a party bent on surrendering our security to our terrorist enemies. To be sure not all who vote Democrat want this result, most of the others vote Democrat because they want socialism, gay marriage and dumbed down schools and/or open borders.

That leaves only fifteen percent, or about 1 in 7, of Americans who understand that we are the only hope our nation has.

This bares repeating: Only about 1 in 7 Americans seems to understand the true murderous intentions of our enemies and/or the destructive nature of socialism.

Nevertheless, in the last election, a certain percentage of America’s 1 in 7 voters, people who should know better, voted in a way that showed they were willing put their own demands for single issue purity over the safety of America. This is the reality of what these voters have brought about by their foolish demands that politicians suddenly toe their line totally or be thrown under a bus along with our nation.

The ill informed nitwits that vote Democrat in a knee jerk fashion, the socialists who, though born here, hate America – they are what they are. They must be fought at the ballot box every two years. They are almost like evil little children who will be what they will be, but the, “ I’m staying home because I’m so much more conservative than you, so much smarter than you..” 1 in 7 voters must be held to a higher standard. These voters can not claim ignorance. They willfully handed the reigns of power and responsibility for America’s safety over to the Democrats. There were just enough of these willfully “blind” “single issue purity” voters to hand the Democrats 16 of their 36 victories; this figure being derived from the fact that for the want of just 63,000 more votes spread across these races, America would not now be in the danger she is in.

These people should have known better. They took their own narrow agendas with them on Election Day. They played “make believe” with America’s future and safety. The bought into the Democrat controlled media’s lies that we can’t win the war, the economy is tanking, and open borders would somehow be less threatening if only the Democrats controlled both Houses.

Now these 1 in 7 voters are trying to explain what they did by wringing their hands and complaining about not wanting to “vote for the lesser of two evils.” Apparently it does not occur to this group that the choices we have are really just the choices we have. They don’t understand that failing to vote for the “lesser of two evils” guarantees that you will get the greater of two evils.

These people fancy themselves as so much smarter and so much more conservative than the rest of the 1 in 7. They are nothing more than “conservative” useful idiots.

They, and unfortunately us, now have to live with the disastrous consequences of their self delusions that they would somehow get from a Democrat Congress what they couldn't get from a Republican congress, but that would be the only difference. We will all now have to deal with Democrats who will be as disappointing on some issues, but terrifying on other issues, lots of other issues.

These are a series of headlines. This piece is not written to anyone who needs to have them explained. It is written to the “conservative” useful idiots among us who have joined the fools and socialists to “teach” someone a lesson. Here’s the first week’s “lessons”.

January 1, 2007 to January 8, 2007:

"Dems Prepare Slew of Oversight Hearings"

"Democrats push for Alaska drilling ban"

"Pelosi, Reid Oppose Iraq Troop Surge (Letter Sent To Bush!)"

"New Muslim congressman avoids loyalty questions"

"Socialism on the move: Edwards pushes Universal Healthcare"

"SEARCH ON FOR TOUGH NEW WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL; expected avalanche of congressional committee investigations..."

"Pelosi's new image as Italian Catholic mom -- more than a 'San Francisco liberal'"

"'IMPEACH!' is message at Nancy Pelosi beach (San Fransicko Alert)"

"What Americans MUST Know About the Incoming Senate Intelligence Chairman"

"(Mother") Sheehan Right to Demand Democrats Act on Iraq (Susan Estrich Barf Alert!)"

"House rules change clears way for tax increases"


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bs; electionresults; liberalgop; snivel; stayathomevoters; usefulidiots; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 361-366 next last
To: roses of sharon

A perfectly reasonable post, though you're still blaming conservatives.


141 posted on 01/08/2007 10:17:36 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Circumstances are the fire by which the mettle of men is tried.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Ahhhh...more from the Blame Americans First club.


No....it wasn't the lackluster showing that the politicians and party generals gave, it was the stoopid voters!

Yes, we didn't keep our majority because the votes are too stoopid to keep us in power.

Sounds EXACTLY like what the Democrats said when Newt lead the Republican take over of congress.


142 posted on 01/08/2007 10:18:00 AM PST by Eagle Eye (I'm a RINO because I'm too conservative to be a real Republican.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Nah. Conservative principles are actually quite attractive, if they are communicated effectively.

Agreed and they can also be effective when some pull a Democrat fear campaign

Whereever that happened in this recent election, conservatism won.

Having Gramma Nancy in charge was a win for conservatism ??

I think not

143 posted on 01/08/2007 10:18:09 AM PST by Mo1 (YEA, What Onyx said in her tag line !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Stop stalking me.

WHAT?

144 posted on 01/08/2007 10:18:16 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Circumstances are the fire by which the mettle of men is tried.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Blackirish
"They are polling well with the base and the public at large. Repubs who will be social right champions while ignoring fiscal issues and trusting the voter with personal responsibility will go down just like Santurom and Allen........and like Chaffee? and Keane? and DeWine?...where is the pattern?
145 posted on 01/08/2007 10:19:01 AM PST by cookcounty (The "Greatest Generation" was also the most violent generation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

Excellent analysis, ping me as you update it.


146 posted on 01/08/2007 10:19:28 AM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

This is a Helluva way to work to remain united much less hospitable towards one another and maintain some decorum ... but FR is an open forum after all. jmo

The election is over, everyone should learn from it and get 'em in '08. However, I also understand some have longer vent times and that the real show has just begun, ie. the 110th. Being from California, I can empathize with them to a degree.

We'll survive the bulk of the outcome of the last electoral debacle as long as cooler heads prevail and the President wields a veto pen.

Go to work already on a winning strategy for 2008 and enough with all the rock lobbing and crying in the milk.

This place is gonna be the pits the next 2 years with this being the theme for some. It's more the charge of being a FReeper to make dems in offices lives hell. The party of the Dems is a target rich environment, need folks be reminded.

Party on.

See ya at Daytona. ;-)


147 posted on 01/08/2007 10:19:42 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
Republicans controlled Congress for twelve years...and gave us the biggest growth of government since FDR!

Much of which was due to the 9/11 attacks and the War on Terror. What were the Republicans supposed to do? Ignore it?

The Republicans also gave us tax cuts - do you think the democrats will do the same?

Do you really feel we are better off with the Democrats in charge?

There isn't a thrid option - it's either the GOP or the DNC.

I wish the GOP had won - are you really glad the dems won?

148 posted on 01/08/2007 10:19:55 AM PST by Tokra (I think I'll retire to Bedlam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Having Gramma Nancy in charge was a win for conservatism ??

Uhmmm...I certainly didn't say that. I said whereever conservatism was effectively communicated, conservatism won.

149 posted on 01/08/2007 10:20:29 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Circumstances are the fire by which the mettle of men is tried.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

BTTT


150 posted on 01/08/2007 10:20:47 AM PST by Mo1 (YEA, What Onyx said in her tag line !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
"...any FReeper who is pushing this "blame conservatives" meme is deeply suspect. What they betray is a deep dislike for conservatism."

Did you miss this sentence in the article?

"There were just enough of these willfully “blind” “single issue purity” voters to hand the Democrats 16 of their 36 victories; this figure being derived from the fact that for the want of just 63,000 more votes spread across these races,.."

OTOH, as we all know here at FR, historically, the mid-term election of a President in his second term has been a big loser. Last year we had a perfect storm of
(1) A President who is argeably, the worst communicator of the television age,
(2) A populace, femenized for the last 30 years, is war weary
(3) A Republican controlled Congress which did little to earn the votes of Republicans. Other than they aren't democrats.

Hence, loser...

151 posted on 01/08/2007 10:22:17 AM PST by muleskinner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: muleskinner
Did you miss this sentence in the article?

It isn't an "article." It's a vanity, written for the sole purpose of trashing conservatives.

152 posted on 01/08/2007 10:25:13 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Circumstances are the fire by which the mettle of men is tried.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: Tokra
Easily - by not allowing the Democrats to seize control of the Congress.

Yes, because remember politics is a team sport. 'We' have to be in control instead of 'they'.

I vote for who will represent my views best at the federal level. As a limited government Classical Liberal who believes the federal government has overstepped its bounds time and again into the affairs of the separate and sovereign states I vote the way my conscience and not the ways others would have me to. I don't care about their party affiliation but base my vote on how they state they will represent my views in Congress. If that person fails to do so at the next election I don't vote for them.

Don't worry, I vote when the time is upon us. I rarely vote for Senatorial or Presidential elections (as that was not the original intent) but I do vote.

153 posted on 01/08/2007 10:25:25 AM PST by billbears (Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HostileTerritory

Please do your homework again. In the Northeast/Midwest in small rural towns where light manufacturing exists, is where the Dems made inroads by 5 percent or less. Big issue is the effects of free trade on these communities. Include the south in the mix. Unabashed free trade is costing the GOP blue collar conservatives and future elections.


154 posted on 01/08/2007 10:25:25 AM PST by Fee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Dane
"Many "Republicans" do not trust, nor really like, conservatives."

"Why should they. It was the "true conservatives" who put nancy pelosi in power."

No, Dane, it was liberals like you who put the liberals in power because you think the same. Liberal Republicans helped liberal Democrats, it's natural. Democrats are much more convincing as liberals, they've been at it longer.
If the same liberal position is held by a Democrat and a Republican, the swing voter will vote for the real thing, the liberal Democrat.
The Republican party, and the Republican legislature, tried hard to convince the voters it was just as liberal as the Democrats. In many cases they succeeded, and the voters had no reason to vote Republican.

The voters necessary to win a national election hold no strong ties to either party. You cannot, as you believe, get them to vote for a candidate only because of their party affiliation. You cannot, as you believe, get them to vote for a liberal, no matter what party they represent, if they believe in conservative principles.

Many voters, who previously voted for Republicans because of the principles they campaigned on, felt betrayed when those Republicans abandoned those principles and governed like liberals. It is perfectly understandable that these voters no longer trust Republicans and took a chance on the other candidate.

We will never win the necessary swing voters with demands for party loyalty. We must show these voters there is a difference between Republicans and Democrats and convince them that their vote will not be betrayed. I have seen nothing from the Republican leadership that would lead me to believe they understand this or that they will not continue pandering to special interests that have the money but not the votes.

If a conservative is to be elected in 2008, it will be because of the work of conservatives, not because of the Republican party.
155 posted on 01/08/2007 10:25:28 AM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
Well, for what it's worth, I'm tired of being labled a "traitor," just because I'm NOT a lock-step republican... I'm closer to a "small 'l' libertarian."

However, I did vote for Jim Talent, and against Emmanuel Cleaver.

Mark

156 posted on 01/08/2007 10:25:39 AM PST by MarkL (When Kaylee says "No power in the `verse can stop me," it's cute. When River says it, it's scary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton
If a conservative is to be elected in 2008, it will be because of the work of conservatives, not because of the Republican party.

Bears repeating...

157 posted on 01/08/2007 10:27:10 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Circumstances are the fire by which the mettle of men is tried.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: mugs99
So as a libertarian you prefer the President is impeached, taxes are raised, we leave Iraq to Iran/Syria/Saudi Arabia and Turkey to divy up, we have socialized healthcare, etc.? If so, you sound like a dem more than a libertarian (to me)..

Fact is we have two parties in this country and you may lean toward libertarian more than conservative or more than liberal, but in this day and age you need to choose a side of the fence and support it, warts and all...

158 posted on 01/08/2007 10:28:18 AM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37
In the two-party system we've had for years, not voting for the lesser of two evils is a deriliction of duty.

If you want to effect change beyond simply voting, you do grassroots work to persuade people and politicans to effect policy and philosophical change, not by wasting your vote on a third-party candidate.

I find these '100percenters' quite childish. They want to be held blameless by taking no chance they could be blamed for - gutless. They are gods to themselves, with standards so high nobody can meet them.

Politics in a 'democracy' or 'representative republic' is the last place on earth to expect purism.

159 posted on 01/08/2007 10:30:06 AM PST by Swordfished
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

That's right. Yesterday Steny Hoyer said the President told him he is pleased to be able to work with the democrats to pass his immigration reform (amnesty) that was being blocked by the GOP congress.


160 posted on 01/08/2007 10:30:51 AM PST by Arizona Carolyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 361-366 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson