Posted on 01/27/2007 12:07:05 AM PST by JohnHuang2
They talk about the secular civil war in Iraq?
What about the one that is about to happen here? And I mean an all out shooting war since the bantering about is already being done.
I was with a group of "Pro Choicers" a few years ago and their comments chilled me to the bone. They spoke about being "overrun by the wrong kinds of people" without the slightest hint of remorse. "Who's going to pay for all these babies?" was a question that kept recurring.
I asked about the morality of dealing with poverty by preventing poor people from being born. They simply dismissed me as a kook. Then one other voice in the room added softly: "It's called genocide."
I'd like to see a documentary on the "Choice" movement that explores this aspect of their philosophy. I wonder what the MSM reaction would be.
But doesn't Mama profess to be Catholic when it's convenient?
Yikes.
"Who's going to pay for all these babies?" was a question that kept recurring.
One of the more cogent arguments that pro-choicers have made is that the pro-Life movement is more pro-birth than it is pro-life. Filled with people who love the idea of babies being born, but without the willingness to pay for those things that are necessary for the child to thrive in the world.
Not saying that I agree, just saying.
It would be a very short documentary.
This is very strong language. Is Mel White really dishonest? Or is the only "lie" he tells is his opinion that God loves gay people the way they are? Or that he considers his former employer Jerry Falwell and other evangelicals to be intolerant because they do not believe as he does about the morality of gays? I wish the author would have detailed specific lies that White has told--or else refrain from this kind of characterization.
It's not a cogent argument. It's a snotty stock reply designed to end the conversation. What they mean is this: "If you don't support every hare-brained Socialist scheme of the American Left you have nothing to say about the 50 million babies that have been slaughtered since 1973."
In one respect, no one is beyond the reach of Christ. In another, there are those who reject throughout their entire lives, and they then are numbered with the eternally lost.
She could well be in that latter group. From our perspective, time will tell. From God's, He already knows.
.....'"Like your truth is the only truth and everyone should believe the way you believe?" ""
I have never met a Liberal who didn't believe this about ther own philosophy as they try to make illegal any dissenting poinion.
But there IS this difference between Liberals and Christians:One: God is on record as saying that Belief cannot be shoved down anyones' throat
And Two: A Christian can be exposed as a hypocrite.
This is because a Christians Truths are OUTSIDE himself and therefore immutable.
Since liberals are each the author of their own truth they cannot ever be hypocritical. They are gods. Practically speaking, they never fail, they never lie, they are incapable of being wrong. They are jealous, and they are vengeful.
It's called (raw) human nature.
Liberals hate Christians because they believe they can establish a better world than can God. They believe their rules are better than His. Therefore, God must be placed in a secondary position to their ideals about how the world should be.
Leftists hate real Christians. They love those who call themselves Christians but promote values contrary to their religion.
"Liberals in America despise Christians of true faith.
They do this because in doing so their own guilt is appeased, their anger is justified, and they can finally lay blame for their own misery at someone else's feet."
And they do it because deep down inside, they doubt the legitimacy of their own heresy, and it frightens them.
"This is the God they innately know they will have to deal with someday."
Everyone knows there is a God, even the muslims.
Some people, like Ms. Pelosi, think that by acting brave against Him, he will leave them alone. Or, maybe they think that satan will act as their attorney on their Day of Judgement.
We Christians, by Faith, follow Christ's lead. We know the Truth. We should hold fast, through each test we encounter.
I feel sorry for Ms. Pelosi. She apparently has not needed, nor heeded, God's loving hand yet. I truly hope she will, soon.
My response is that money does not make one thrive in the world. A child doesn't have to material goods to have a worthwhile life...and especially to have a life that furthers God's plan.
They do this because in doing so their own guilt is appeased, their anger is justified, and they can finally lay blame for their own misery at someone else's feet.
= = =
YUP
I can't help but ponder if (in an alternate universe) back when Republicans took over the House in '94, if the son of Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich had released a documentary revealing the lies and hypocrisy of the left, exposing the America-hating un-intelligentsia of (for example) New York and L.A. society, if there would be such fawning reviews of such a work as we're seeing with the daughter of 'Madam Speaker'?
= = =
Great point.
It's much simpler than the author describes. Liberals (secular religionists) want to control people's behavior - and can't do it as easily when a Church who also wants to control people's behavior gets there first. It's a rivalry for adherents. If the predominant religion in America was Hinduism, liberals would hate Hindus just as much.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.