Posted on 04/17/2007 12:19:57 PM PDT by Dont Mention the War
Logical Q to me.
I’ll go with Oriental especially since the MSM recently has taken to calling all the jihadi’s Asians anyway and thus completely confused me about what they mean when they say Asian.
I had to look that one up:
The Korean name for Korea is “Hangeuk” and its people are called “Hangeuksaram”. The ancient name for Korea is “Choson”.
Let us know if you get an answer from Ms. Lee. (Any relation to Bruce Lee?....j.k.)
okay but freepers were expecting a ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT FROM MEXICO. ill bet theyre BITTERLY disappointed! (and this is not sarcasm)
Guess they don't have the 'panties in a wad' affliction of the Asian America Journalists Association.
So what do they want him to be? “White”...nice and generic. “Jewish”? That would help the MSM’s campaign against Israel, even he’s not Jewish. “Minority”? That might create unnecessary sympathy. Or the greatest alternative known to demographers everywhere—”OTHER”.
Here is the question. Most posters on FR take great offense when some says african american, asian american, etc. prefering that all be just american.
But when a mass murderer is an asain american, you can hear the crickets chirping regarding calling him just an american.
Well, that’s weird. I could be wrong, but I always thought it was about the same as calling a black person “negro” or “colored.” An antiquated term relegated to use by those not “in the know.”
I took back what I wrote, see the thread.
Oh, good grief. His name tells people that he is Asian. I guess the media should not give out his name, either. Or if a Hispanic kills someone, they should`nt give out his name. Or if a Muslim kills someone they should`nt give out his name. On and on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.