Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Worker fired after posting picture of Jesus (in his cubicle)
WND ^ | April 21, 2007

Posted on 04/21/2007 5:58:54 AM PDT by NYer

A call center employee says he has been dismissed from his job for posting an artist's rendition of the crucifixion during Easter week, even though other employees were allowed to post pictures and art as they chose in their cubicles.

Chris Romansky, a former employee of Barclays, told WND he was told there had been a complaint about the picture he put up to remind himself of Christ's sacrifice on the cross, a foundational belief in Christianity.

A company spokeswoman, Donna Sokolsky, told WND that the job termination "had nothing to do with anything religious whatsoever." But she said she was not permitted by human resources to know "more beyond that."

"What I CAN tell you is that Barclays has very strict policies around nondescrimination (sic), especially religious. I cannot speak for this particular individual's situation but I know that there was no religious descrimination. I do not think you have a story here."

She followed up several days later with a formal, unattributed statement, "We do not discriminate or take any action based on religious affiliation."

Barclays PLC, according to Sokolsky, is a large global financial service provider, offering banking, investment banking and investment management services. It operates in more than 60 countries and has 110,500 employees worldwide.

Romansky told WND his dismissal was effective April 13, and he has contacted state labor regulators about filing a complaint.

"We're actually allowed to hang up pictures on our cubes. I had a picture of my wife, and there's a cross in the background but that didn't seem to bother anybody," he said. He also had posted a couple of Internet clippings, but those generated no response either.

Then during the Easter season, he said, "I hung a picture of the crucifixion, actually it was before Easter. It was of the crucifixion of Jesus and it showed the Resurrection and it said 'Happy Easter.'"

"I came in on the following Tuesday, and it was face down on my desk, so I put it back up," he said. Then a team manager came and told him there had been a complaint that it was "offensive" and he had to take it back down.

The manager called him into her office. "She told me people were offended, and she told me anything with Jesus and God can't be up," Romansky told WND.

The manager told him to leave the building. "She took copies of the pictures," he said.

Several conversations with managers and the human resources department followed, Romansky said.

"She [the manager] then called me and told me they're going to have to let me go," he said. He said he'd never even been "corrected" before by the company, and she responded that he was being dismissed for insubordination.

"I said I want [copies of] all the corrective actions. I want an explanation," he said.

He said the "complaint" about his Easter picture may have been in retaliation, because earlier he had complained about the crudity of the conversation in the office.

"I feel I was singled out," he said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: barclays
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last
To: NYer

“had nothing to do with anything religious whatsoever.” But she said she was not permitted by human resources to know “more beyond that.”

I don’t think that answer is going to sell in Peoria. The fired employee says it was religious, so it would seem that if they have another explanation, they had better explain unless they want us to draw conclusions of our own based on just one side of the story.


61 posted on 04/21/2007 8:27:31 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer; narses

There is no excuse for this. I hope the fired worker sues and collects a boat full of money, and that the people who fired him get fired themselves.

If this isn’t discrimination, there is no such thing as discrimination.


62 posted on 04/21/2007 8:31:15 AM PDT by Clintonfatigued (If the GOP were to stop worshiping Free Trade as if it were a religion, they'd win every election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Makes me think of the Office episode where the picture of babies wearing ties and playing musical instruments offended one of the co-office workers. Hilarius episode!


63 posted on 04/21/2007 8:38:21 AM PDT by GOPPachyderm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Lawsuit! Liberals never learn.


64 posted on 04/21/2007 8:40:05 AM PDT by pray4liberty (http://totallyunjust.tripod.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo
They reacted literally like demons; screeching, screaming obscenities, exposing themselves and kissing their same-sex partners in front of him, etc.

I've often wondered if some of these folks are just downright possessed.

65 posted on 04/21/2007 8:48:17 AM PDT by pray4liberty (http://totallyunjust.tripod.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...

.


66 posted on 04/21/2007 9:51:57 AM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, insects)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
I would fire him too. That stuff does not belong in the workplace.

To avoid dealing with the nuances of the law, I'd assure everyone that he wasn't fired over the picture.

In fact, I believe any employer shoould be able to fire any employee at any time for any reason.

67 posted on 04/21/2007 9:54:02 AM PDT by Mariner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I hope he calls the American Center for Law and Justice! http://www.aclj.org


68 posted on 04/21/2007 9:56:43 AM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Pray for our President and for our heroes in Iraq and Afghanistan, and around the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #69 Removed by Moderator

To: SoldierMedic
Then explain why the supervisor said this:

"She told me people were offended, and she told me anything with Jesus and God can't be up"

70 posted on 04/21/2007 10:01:14 AM PDT by TenthAmendmentChampion (Pray for our President and for our heroes in Iraq and Afghanistan, and around the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NYer

These people have a controversy with God.


71 posted on 04/21/2007 10:04:09 AM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
I am amazed that atheists get offended. It is not like they actually believe in anything.

Well, there are members of another religion that get very offended about Easter.

72 posted on 04/21/2007 10:07:33 AM PDT by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GOPPachyderm
"Makes me think of the Office episode where the picture of babies wearing ties and playing musical instruments offended one of the co-office workers. Hilarius episode!"

So, please tell us about that. I hadn't heard that one.

73 posted on 04/21/2007 10:10:05 AM PDT by jackibutterfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Wormwood
Maybe you weren't a prude who alienated himself from the rest of his office-mates, as indicated in this story?

Prude: someone who won't lower himself to my level.

74 posted on 04/21/2007 10:12:27 AM PDT by Hacksaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: TenthAmendmentChampion
"She told me people were offended, and she told me anything with Jesus and God can't be up," Romansky told WND.

He could be para-phrasing, and in doing so could be explaining the message he heard, rather than the message that was intended by the supervisor.

Or perhaps he has added hyperbole to the statement. Perhaps she said, "People are offended, please don't put pictures of the nature in a position for all to see", and he has just added exageration to aid in making a point.
75 posted on 04/21/2007 10:13:08 AM PDT by SoldierMedic (Rowan Walter, 23 Feb 2007)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Religious persecution. I think he has a day in court coming, if that is what he wants to do.


76 posted on 04/21/2007 10:23:17 AM PDT by Salvation (" With God all things are possible. ")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
No sweat. I'm sure the ACLU is already on there way over there to represent this person.
77 posted on 04/21/2007 10:34:52 AM PDT by fish hawk (The religion of Darwinism = Monkey Intellect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo

Now for the first time I understand why God’s name is used in so much profanity in movies,tv and people who call themselves Christian.I wish Christians could come together and bring more attention to this evil of using Gods name in such an abusive matter. And when people say g-d this and g-d that it makes my stomach cringe,and I try to politely ask them not to do so.


78 posted on 04/21/2007 10:48:40 AM PDT by red irish (Gods Children in the womb are to be loved too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: raccoonradio

http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/news.aspx?id=13124

U.S. Supreme Court refused it.


79 posted on 04/21/2007 10:57:48 AM PDT by Ladysmith ((NRA SAS) To a liberal, "feeling safe" is far more important than "being safe.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
Really? What about an employee who reports illegal actions by the corp to the authorities?

What about an employee in a corporation who is the victim of ONE boss who has an agenda which is contrary to the corporation's best interest. I was run out of a company once because I went to my bosses boss about a serious ethical violation by my boss, one that was harmful to the company. She spent the next year doing everything she could to get me fired. When I just left, did that benefit the stockholders or the company. NO.

You view may be right for a small company where the owner does the firing but it doesn't work for a corporation when petty tyrants work against the interest of the owners by firing good workers to serve their personal agendas.
80 posted on 04/21/2007 11:17:54 AM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson