Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smoking In Private Clubs Overturned
WTAM.COM ^ | 05/18/07 | WTAM.COM

Posted on 05/18/2007 5:42:12 AM PDT by GOP_Lady

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-124 next last
To: E. Pluribus Unum
So it's okay if I pay a lobbyist who can get a law passed that makes you have to do things that I don't have to do, when we are basically in the same business?

So you think the bar & restaurant owners lobbied for the smoking ban? What about the owners of the private clubs, did they lobby for the smoking ban?

Nope. Neither the bar owners nor the private clubs did it. --The officious whiny little nicotine-Nazis did it.

But instead of cowboy-ing up and start a petition drive or suing the state for lack of due process or putting in a outdoor patio or refusing service to a nonsmoker (they know who they are); they'd rather use the Russian solution and get the courts to drag private clubs down into the dirt with them.

61 posted on 05/18/2007 7:07:33 AM PDT by dread78645 (Evolution. A doomed theory since 1859.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: vox humana
Polluting the air other people breathe is not a right.

Sell your car and turn off the power to your house.

The only way for you to not pollute the air is for you to die and be buried in a casket that won't let your rotting body release its fetid vapors to the atmosphere.

Feel free to do so.

62 posted on 05/18/2007 7:15:10 AM PDT by Eaker (Free The Texas 3 - Ramos, Compean and Hernandez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Take back their rights?

WTF does that mean?

An armed invasion of the legislature?
**********************************
Take back their property ownership rights.

This will not end with smoking bans...
Kelo also has opened the flood gates on many aspects of ownership of property.
I’m having a real hard time seeing supposed Conservatives understanding these concepts and how they are connected.
“It’s for the Children” is really doing it’s charm on American rights - all of them.
This is not about smoking....


63 posted on 05/18/2007 7:23:09 AM PDT by libertarian27 (Land of the Fee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Dixie Yooper
chewing on a nasty brown turd.

We smoke tobacco not what you apparently try to smoke.

Put the $hit down and grab a Camel.

64 posted on 05/18/2007 7:23:55 AM PDT by Eaker (Free The Texas 3 - Ramos, Compean and Hernandez)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Dixie Yooper

Huh? You’re a little extreme, aren’t you there, bud?


65 posted on 05/18/2007 7:24:11 AM PDT by GOP_Lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
So bad laws only get passed because the people affected by them didn't fight hard enough "in the first place."

That is a bit of an oversimplification, but in my expience has often been the case.

And once the bad law is passed those people should just roll over and die?

Not at all, fight to get the entire thing overturned, not force it upon others.

In this Ohio case I believe the bar owners who sued made a tactical error somewhere along the line.

66 posted on 05/18/2007 7:27:56 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: vox humana
Polluting the air other people breathe is not a right.

Remember that the next time you start up your car.

67 posted on 05/18/2007 7:28:29 AM PDT by beltfed308 (Rudy: When you absolutely,positively need a liberal for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Well you start “fighting back” by doing what is going on in Vegas.

They passed a food and smoke ban here.. so if you own a bar that serves food, you cant allow smoking (casinos are exempt).

Whats happening? Bars are flat out ignoring the ban.. and the health dept is flustered.

The dirty little secret of smoking bans is that they require COMPLIANCE to work. There is no smoking police. The enforcers cant be everywhere and pretty much, if you do as you please as an owner of a bar.. they are powerless to stop you.

The jerks in Vegas that passed this law are now learning that Vegas and its smokers will NOT BOW to big brother.


68 posted on 05/18/2007 7:33:34 AM PDT by eXe (Si vis pacem, para bellum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
"I don't blame them. Laws should be applied equally. Even bad laws."

I agree, only way to get them overturned. These "pivate clubs" are in fact open to the public and compete for customers just like any other bar.

69 posted on 05/18/2007 7:35:09 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
Not at all, fight to get the entire thing overturned, not force it upon others.

If the "others" are benefitting from the discriminatory law, they will fight your fixing it.

Force them into the net, too, and they will have no choice except to join forces with you in fighting it.

70 posted on 05/18/2007 7:37:43 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("All the measures of the law should protect property and punish plunder." --Frederic Bastiat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

Here in Texas “private clubs” serve any and all that walk in the door. What is the “membership” requirement where you are at?


71 posted on 05/18/2007 7:38:08 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: brownsfan

I agree, but the convenient conservatives can’t see that their efforts that support smoking bans are actually paving the way for the GW idiots. Both are dangerous.


72 posted on 05/18/2007 7:43:24 AM PDT by CSM ("The rioting arsonists are the same folks who scream about global warming." LibFreeOrDie 5/7/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
If the "others" are benefitting from the discriminatory law, they will fight your fixing it.

That has never been my experience. From the get go in Delaware the private clubs were to be exempt from the ban, but they worked on the side of those it would hurt, and the bars did not try to get the private clubs included. There were a couple of rogue antis who tried, but they wre hushed up rather quickly.

Force them into the net, too, and they will have no choice except to join forces with you in fighting it.

Wrong approach. By forcing them into the net you wind up with resentment, not cooperation.

73 posted on 05/18/2007 7:44:05 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Gabz
Wrong approach. By forcing them into the net you wind up with resentment, not cooperation.

That's one opinion.

74 posted on 05/18/2007 7:45:19 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum ("All the measures of the law should protect property and punish plunder." --Frederic Bastiat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady

This constitutes proof that private clubs are not private.


75 posted on 05/18/2007 7:47:53 AM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the Treaty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpsb

When I speak of “private clubs” I’m primarily speaking of the ELks and Moose Lodges, VFW’s and American Legions.

Only members and guests may be served.


76 posted on 05/18/2007 7:48:42 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
I wouldn't’t be surprised if organized crime soon realized that their is a lot of money to be made in a return to the the old 1920 prohibition era speakeasy's where you go to an unmarked door in an alley a little slot slides open and somebody asks for the password. You enter and can smoke, drink and gamble all you want.
77 posted on 05/18/2007 7:49:58 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Not just opinion, but my personal experience, and the experience of many others I have worked with on this issue over the years.


78 posted on 05/18/2007 7:51:13 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: GOP_Lady
A question:

Could private clubs ban all law enforcement from the premises without a search warrant, since they by definition "private" and not considered open to the public?

79 posted on 05/18/2007 7:53:56 AM PDT by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gabz

Yea we have them here, there serve EVERYONE, memership not required or checked.


80 posted on 05/18/2007 7:54:57 AM PDT by jpsb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson