Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hannity asks Giuliani about amnesty [he's for it]
FOX News ^ | May 20, 2007 | Sean Hannity/Rudy Giuliani

Posted on 05/21/2007 7:57:29 PM PDT by Jim Robinson

~~big snip~~

HANNITY: Let me move to the issue that has come up again this week, and that's the issue of immigration. And as somebody that hosts a radio show for three hours a day, and we've got our show on FOX and now our Sunday show, I can tell you it is a defining issue for conservatives in their desire. — They want these borders controlled and they don't want amnesty in any way, shape, matter or form. And the consensus that keeps emerging is sort of amnesty-lite. They won't call it amnesty, but the feeling among conservatives is it is amnesty.

GIULIANI: Here's what we have to get done, and this comes from my expertise in security, law enforcement most of my life. I know that better than politics. I know security better than politics.

We have to know who's in the United States. We have to have a database in which we know who is here — everybody who is here from a foreign country. We need to know it so we can prevent Fort Dixes. I know Fort Dix didn't quite happen that way. But the next one could happen that way.

And we need to have a tamper-proof ID card. So now your policy — you have to set that. You've got to be clear about this. That's what we have to — so now you have to have a policy that gets you there.

We need to know everybody who's in the United States from a foreign country. You need a fence. You need an electronic fence. You need a physical fence. You need a Border Patrol that is bigger and trained in being able to spot people and stop people.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; elections; giuliani; giulianitruthfile; illegalaliens; illegalimmigration; pragmatism; winning08
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last
To: Reaganesque
He was great on 9/11 but, he’s not the complete package.

It's time to unpack that statement, imo. What did he actually DO?

I know he gave press conferences. He attended funerals. That is what mayors and politicians of all sorts, do.

He was in the place at the time. That's about it, as far as I can recall.

101 posted on 05/22/2007 6:40:18 AM PDT by don-o (We are "THEY")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lokibob

Of course! I am talking about illegals also. I have no problem with folks coming here legally from anywhere. But it is really unfair to those who enter by the rules to give amnesty to those who willingly break our laws to get here.


102 posted on 05/22/2007 6:52:57 AM PDT by upsdriver (DUNCAN HUNTER FOR PRESIDENT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: pissant
As I said (and I think we are agreeing on principle) the courts have to adjudicate every deportation case. Typically, they let the defendant (illegal) out on their own recognizance, knowing full well they will never come back. So, in this way, the courts do have a means of circumventing even the toughest policy. Congress, state or national, cannot write a law interfering with a judge's discretion. This has been attempted before with criminal legislation and mandatory sentencing and, of course, has always been found unconstitutional, by a judge, and sent back to congress to change the language. So, yes, the courts can, have, and will screw things up. They cannot, however, grant an illegal the right to work. This has already been vetted nationally in right to work cases seeking to circumvent union strangle holds. Anyway, my point is: no jobs/no illegals. This kind of legislation should be expanded to homeowners as well. Though more difficult, there should be a way of policing the labor force in affluent areas as well to purge the use of illegals.
103 posted on 05/22/2007 7:12:08 AM PDT by DanielLongo (Don't tread on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
I believe you misunderstood him. The biometric cards he referred to were for legal, alien residents who had a right to work in this country. It is a means of tracking those who are here legally and can determine their eligibility for work and the time expiration on that privilege. Guliani and McCain are for worker id’s for all “illegal” alien residents as a means of identification and tracking. There is a huge gulf between the two scenarios. One deals with “legal” aliens and the other with “illegal” aliens. Romney wants the cards so that employers can tell the difference between the two. Kindly, look at it again and I think you will see where you were mistaken.
104 posted on 05/22/2007 7:16:25 AM PDT by DanielLongo (Don't tread on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: DanielLongo
Read the transcript. He was talking in the same context as Rooty on the ID cards.

Unless everyone has to have one its a worthless idea.

105 posted on 05/22/2007 7:37:06 AM PDT by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super Walmart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: DanielLongo
The biometric cards he referred to were for legal, alien residents who had a right to work in this country. It is a means of tracking those who are here legally and can determine their eligibility for work and the time expiration on that privilege

So tell us - how do you tell apart someone who does not have a card and doesn't need one from someone who should have a card but it's expired?

These cards only work if everyone has one. And that's Rudy's intent here.

106 posted on 05/22/2007 7:59:15 AM PDT by dirtboy (A store clerk has done more to fight the WOT than Rudy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy; pissant; Beagle8U
We, as citizens, already have several cards. Of course an illegal alien can counterfeit a SS# and a driver's license but they can do that because there is no system for employers to validate against the biometric information. That is Romney's point. If someone walks in with green eyes and stands 4'11 inches and their driver's license information comes back from the state as saying they are brown eyed and stand 6'1", there is a problem. See, the alien can counterfeit the card, but not the biometric information in the state or national database. They can make all the cards they want, but they won't be any good. As it is now, all they have to do is present the documentation that is "required" under law, but the employer doesn't have to verify it against anything. Furthermore, if you have a license/SS# that is being used by multiple workers, the letter goes out to the employer to gather more information. I would think that any innocent citizen would appreciate some level of law enforcement to enter in at this point to see that their identity is protected. It doesn't have to be a SWAT team, just a little follow up by local authorities. Again, Romney's point is the card is to be used to identify "legal" status, not to grant legality to otherwise "illegal" aliens. I think that is what we are asking for. If they are illegal, they get ejected. If they are legal, we joke with them in the break room and call them friends.
107 posted on 05/22/2007 9:26:00 AM PDT by DanielLongo (Don't tread on me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I’ll agree as soon as I see a stake driven through the heart of his campaign. Same here brother.
108 posted on 05/22/2007 9:31:49 AM PDT by NucSubs (Rudy Giuliani 2008! Our liberal democrat is better than theirs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza

Pesto rocks.

:-)

And it certainly is not dead...nor is it “90’s” culture.


109 posted on 05/22/2007 9:40:37 AM PDT by NucSubs (Rudy Giuliani 2008! Our liberal democrat is better than theirs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I SOOOO sick of him weaseling on every question. When the hell is Rudy going to answer whether he supports the SPECIFIC legislation being considered? And if he, if elected president, would sign into law anything like it?

You and I already know the answer to this question. Conservatives CAN NOT let Rudy get away with trying to duck away from this issue that is so hot right now. We need to nail him on it and use the anger Republicans have against the legislation and turn it against Giuliani's candidacy to further sink his chances of gaining the nomination.

110 posted on 05/22/2007 9:41:20 AM PDT by Spiff (Rudy Giuliani Quote (NY Post, 1996) "Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68; Spiff

Thanks, VNS.

If memory serves correctly, Spiff was instrumental in the startup phase of the Minutemen. What do you think of this idea, Spiff?

Oh, and if I was wrong about the Minuteman project, please let me know.


111 posted on 05/22/2007 10:04:08 AM PDT by Kevmo (Duncan Hunter just needs one Rudy G Campaign Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVBtPIrEleM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Vn_survivor_67-68; Kevmo
There's already a few lawyers (far too few) who are exploring the RICO angle against employers of illegal aliens. It's an uphill battle, but so far they've been somewhat successful. I've not heard of anyone going with the wrongful death or injury angle and it is certain a good idea that needs to be explored.

I'll see if I can get the name of one of the attorneys that I've met who was busy filing RICO suits against employers of illegal aliens. Maybe this is something to talk to him about.

As for me being part of organizing the Minuteman Project, besides me knowing the organizers before the project came to be, helping out doing registration on the first CHAOTIC day, and being a MMP volunteer myself, I did no organizing of the MMP.

112 posted on 05/22/2007 10:08:18 AM PDT by Spiff (Rudy Giuliani Quote (NY Post, 1996) "Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Kevmo
The attorney that I met at an illegal immigration conference that is pursuing RICO suits against employers of illegal aliens is Howard Foster. Maybe this is an idea you might want to discuss with him.
113 posted on 05/22/2007 10:14:09 AM PDT by Spiff (Rudy Giuliani Quote (NY Post, 1996) "Most of Clinton's policies are very similar to most of mine.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Spiff; Kevmo

Wrongful death, and other types of CIVIL suits against the employers of illegal aliens who commit harmful acts against US Citizens.......put these facilitators, enablers, and BENEFICIARIES of the illegal presence of these criminals in front of a civil jury......this would remove the political patsy prosecutors from the equation!


114 posted on 05/22/2007 10:26:03 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood

Lol! That picture is Perfect!


115 posted on 05/22/2007 10:45:54 AM PDT by Kitty Mittens (To God Be All Excellent Praise!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: jackieaxe
Ron Paul is against amnesty, in fact he’s against citizenship for anchor babies. Ron Paul, and most of us are better republicans than Rudy G.

Why then, has he never put forth one piece of legislation in all his years in congress to deal with the problem?

116 posted on 05/22/2007 10:49:23 AM PDT by AuntB (" It takes more than walking across the border to be an American." Duncan Hunter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

This guy’s poll numbers can’t fall fast enough....


117 posted on 05/22/2007 10:50:23 AM PDT by Antoninus (P!ss off an environmentalist wacko . . . have more kids.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DanielLongo; dirtboy
“Again, Romney’s point is the card is to be used to identify “legal” status, not to grant legality to otherwise “illegal” aliens. I think that is what we are asking for. If they are illegal, they get ejected. If they are legal, we joke with them in the break room and call them friends.”

Again, read the transcript. He, just like Rooty, said the cards wouldn’t be needed by legal citizens.

That would make them worthless because the courts wont allow profiling to ask only Hispanics or Arabs for the ID cards.
In attempting to pander to libertarians they both want to pretend the cards would cut down on illegals without pi$$ing anyone off.

Its a worthless plan if everyone don’t have to have an ID card proving their legal status.

The only way to stop the illegals is a double fence topped with razor wire and a tamper proof ID card for EVERYONE before they can work or rent anywhere in the US.

$10,000.00 fine for hiring an illegal and 90 days in jail for a 2nd offense added to the fine.

Charge any elected official with a felony if they attempt to bypass the law with sanctuary cities like Rooty did.

No welfare, no free schooling, no nothing. They will all go home.

118 posted on 05/22/2007 11:02:30 AM PDT by Beagle8U (FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super Walmart for news .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Spiff

Thanks, Spiff. I sent him some correspondence.

If anyone else knows of other law firms engaged in RICO lawsuits for wrongful injury, please let me know. If we get some responses, I’ll go ahead and post a vanity thread.


119 posted on 05/22/2007 11:49:00 AM PDT by Kevmo (Duncan Hunter just needs one Rudy G Campaign Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVBtPIrEleM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Now, Hannity is praising Ghouliani for coming out and opposing the amnesty bill, despite this comments and despite Ghouliani's record on illegal immigration. Hannity is absolute disgrace.

RINO Rudy's record on the issue:

Illegal immigration/Immigration Immigration politics have similarly harmed New York. Former mayor Rudolph Giuliani sued all the way up to the Supreme Court to defend the city’s sanctuary policy against a 1996 federal law decreeing that cities could not prohibit their employees from cooperating with the INS. Oh yeah? said Giuliani; just watch me. The INS, he claimed, with what turned out to be grotesque irony, only aims to “terrorize people.” Though he lost in court, he remained defiant to the end. On September 5, 2001, his handpicked charter-revision committee ruled that New York could still require that its employees keep immigration information confidential to preserve trust between immigrants and government. Six days later, several visa-overstayers participated in the most devastating attack on the city and the country in history.

New York conveniently forgot the 1996 federal ban on sanctuary laws until a gang of five Mexicans—four of them illegal—abducted and brutally raped a 42-year-old mother of two near some railroad tracks in Queens. The NYPD had already arrested three of the illegal aliens numerous times for such crimes as assault, attempted robbery, criminal trespass, illegal gun possession, and drug offenses. The department had never notified the INS.

Source: Heather Mac Donald

CNN clip:

Announcer: "Back in 1996, mayor Giuliani went to federal court to challenge new federal laws requiring the city to inform the federal government about illegal immigrants."

Rudy Giuliani: "There isn't a mayor or a public official in this country that's more strongly pro immigrant than I am. Including disagreeing with President Clinton when he signed an anti-immigration legislation about two or three years ago."

The New York Immigrant Coalition Press Release, August, 1989:

Rudy would continue to make city services available to all immigrants, regardless of immigration status.

Prohibit city workers from reporting undocumented immigrants to the INS, unless criminal activity is involved….

Make sure that city workers understand what benefits immigrants are entitled to….

Encourage outreach to immigrant communities to encourage their utilization of city services….

Support the use of interpreters and translators in city government

Support bilingual and bicultural education with goals of learning fluent English and maintaining native language skills….

Oppose making English the “official language” of the U.S.

Support adding alienage to protected class under City’s Human rights Law.

Additionally, he has supported Bush's guest worker program.

Welfare Reform

Rudy's Welfare Plea (Fought to keep immigrants on welfare.)

New York Daily News (via LexisNexis) ^ | 03/21/1997 | Joel Siegel

Mayor Giuliani took his advocacy for immigrants to Congress yesterday, trying to derail the planned August cut-off of federal welfare benefits to legal immigrants including more than 135,000 in New York City.

He said the abrupt end of food stamps and Supplemental Security Income payments would inflict severe and unfair hardships on legal immigrants and impose financial pain on cities like New York that will be forced to step in and help those who lose aid.

The cut-off was a key provision of the sweeping federal welfare reform approved last summer. Some immigrants will begin losing their benefits in June, with all benefits to be halted by Aug. 22.

"All of these people would [lose assistance] all at once, not phased in, not done in some kind of sensible way in which citizens and states could assess, 'How do we replace these benefits?' " Giuliani said.

120 posted on 05/22/2007 12:21:48 PM PDT by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson