Posted on 06/02/2007 8:49:53 AM PDT by gpapa
yep and 12000000 new voters are one as i said “they” did a good job for them
Nah Pombo was a strong conservative and “they”let him down
You know it has to make the desk and now it will
NO AMNESTY!!
For the ILLEGALS?
For Carter? or,....
For Bush?
We’ll split the difference.
All three!
eewwww! secrete = secret.
But certainly a Republican president would *never* sign into law a bill that a Republican House would have never passed, right italian?
Probably true. Just shifting the attention from what is already happening and will continue to happen regardless of the outcome. After it fails, the people will breathe a sigh of great relief and say, 'We did it! We did it! We told them to shove it and they did! Haha. We showed them that the people still rule this country.'
(Meanwhile, back at the ranch . . .)
This same bill, with a few changes came up last fall. It also had the Senate built-in revenue introductions. It failed then , the same “blue slip” procedure was brought up.
I wonder how many conservatives against this bill and amnesty they had to help dump in the 2006 elections to try and run this through again?
Could it really be that was why conservatives had such an awful time in the 2006 elections? RINOs had full party support and funding, while at the same time, the RINO policies were also the reasons so many lost.
What a big freaking scam.
I get so sick of seeing this disinformation repeated. Conservatives turned out as they always have in '06. The problem is that independents went against the GOP and the dems had the intensity. I'm beginning to believe that people who continue to propagate the "teach us a lesson" and "republicans who stayed home" tripe are in some kind of denial about the election results. They think the republicans couldn't have possibly lost because they just sucked that bad for a year or so before the election, it has to be the conservatives fault! lol
Maybe you are right but I do remember all the posts about teaching the Gop a lesson and I am starting to see it again, the primary is for that
You hit the nail right on the head. The entire thing is a smoke and mirrors game, to baffle the sheeple into thinking the Congress and the President are actually working for us.
They’re saying it is the back taxes provision that violates the revenue restrictions in the Constitution, but it seems to me that the FINES that illegals would have to pay are ALSO revenue.
So, even if the Senate pulls the back taxes provision, it could still be blue slip it.
The bill will have to take on a House version in order to pass with revenue references. If they strip out the revenue portions, it becomes a PURE AMNESTY bill.
This statment is BS. The 2/3 he is talking about are mainly people opposed to the bill. The ones who "have misconceptions" and can be lied to in order to clear up the "misconceptions", or so he hopes. He is lumping the people who support the bill with ones who don't and trying to make it a majority for the bill. Politicians are such sleaze bags.
Interesting twist! I’m glad they are looking at every possible means of killing this. But until it is officially dead, and then bloodied a little bit more, I think everyone should keep the heat on. These sleazebags seem to keep finding ways to subvert the will of U.S. citizens. I don’t trust them.
Yup. You got it.
I think the thing’s going down in flames.
That conservatives-stayed-home-and-didn't-vote-and-lost-us-the-elections canard is total BS. The people that fed you that lie are the sames ones who are now telling you that this amnesty bill isn't amnesty.
No your wrong and I am against the bill but you dont want to hear that
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.