Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Set to Slug It Out Over Immigration Bill
Wall Street Journal ^ | June 2, 2007 | Sarah Lueck

Posted on 06/02/2007 8:49:53 AM PDT by gpapa

WASHINGTON -- The Senate faces a contentious debate next week on immigration, with backers of a compromise overhaul bill hopeful it will hold up.

The landmark immigration bill, the outcome of talks between congressional leaders and the White House last month, has stirred deep passions on both sides. During a recess last week, many senators' offices were bombarded with phone calls, emails and visitors critical of the legislation, while supporters organized their own postcard drives, rallies and opinion pieces in local newspapers.

(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: aliens; amnesty; illegalaliens; immigration; senate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

1 posted on 06/02/2007 8:49:55 AM PDT by gpapa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gpapa

The editorial board of WSJ has already admitted this bill will go down in flames. Why the phony, hopeful optimism?


2 posted on 06/02/2007 8:52:06 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource

Even if it should pass the Senate, it still has to clear the House, which ought to be a little tougher on it.


3 posted on 06/02/2007 8:54:59 AM PDT by Nervous Tick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

Bush is to the Republican Party,
as Jimmy Carter was to the Democrat Party.

NO AMNESTY!


4 posted on 06/02/2007 8:56:10 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (D is for Defeatism. R is for Reconquista.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource

The WSJ editorial board is a bunch of Poofers in love with open borders. They like preaching from their Elite podiums about Free Markets and Free People....but are too cowardly to debate a real opponent like NR....WSJ Eds are a bunch of prissy boyz who need to get a set!


5 posted on 06/02/2007 9:06:36 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa
This is the WSJ Editorial Board's view of things:

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

Cheers!

6 posted on 06/02/2007 9:09:16 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gpapa; WashingtonSource; Nervous Tick; indylindy; Liz; calcowgirl

The bill is already dead legally, it is unconstitutional because it raises income, which the Senate cannot do. The House of Representatives is the only body that can introduce revenue bills. If this does pass the Senate, there are a number of House members anxiously awaiting to kill this with a “blue Slip” procedure.

http://uschambercongress.illumen.org/meetnewcongress?action=viewNewsArticle&documentId=2c9e4f6912dc36b10112dc5057c00007


7 posted on 06/02/2007 9:12:10 AM PDT by TommyDale (More Americans are killed each day in the U.S. by abortion than were killed on 9/11 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource
The editorial board of WSJ has already admitted this bill will go down in flames.

Is their admission from this clip ?


8 posted on 06/02/2007 9:18:43 AM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gpapa

“Senate seet to slug it out over immigration.”

Another pillow fight.


9 posted on 06/02/2007 9:19:10 AM PDT by R.W.Ratikal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Elections have consequences would a republican house pass this, good job to all that stood home and didnt vote, 12 million new Voters thank you


10 posted on 06/02/2007 9:19:20 AM PDT by italianquaker ("blue dog democrats", that dog don't hunt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale
it is unconstitutional because it raises income

The morons in the Senate will gladly shed that section.

11 posted on 06/02/2007 9:20:07 AM PDT by Glenn (Free Venezuela!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource

“Clearly the reception to the immigration bill is mixed,” said Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D., Calif.), in an email. Her office has received tens of thousands of emails, letters and postcards on the issue. She said there are “large numbers of people who are supportive” and another group “strongly opposed.”

Republican Sen. Johnny Isakson, one of the negotiators, said about two-thirds of the people from his home state of Georgia who have contacted him are supportive or have misconceptions about the bill that can be cleared up. The rest are strongly opposed and “don’t want to talk about it,” he said.

Do you see what they are doing? Everyone knows the opposition to this bill is like 75% against or more. They are focusing on the people who support it and sayint that just a few tweaks is all that is needed to appease the 75% against.

They really are clueless.


12 posted on 06/02/2007 9:20:25 AM PDT by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker

Political positions have consequences.


13 posted on 06/02/2007 9:20:30 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (D is for Defeatism. R is for Reconquista.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Yes. Thank you for posting it!


14 posted on 06/02/2007 9:21:54 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: sheana

They rare Senator admits the truth. Responses by phone and fax are 95 percent against it. (I think someone actually did admit this last week.)


15 posted on 06/02/2007 9:23:55 AM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

If the Senate removes the revenue-producing fines, then it is truly an AMNESTY bill and there will be no denying that by the White House. The bill will never see the light of day as it currently reads.

Personally, I believe this “bill” was merely a show, produced for the benefit of all parties to make it appear as if they are really trying to do something. Once it is killed, they can all go home and say “We tried” until after the next election. After the 2008 elections, all bets are off.


16 posted on 06/02/2007 9:24:05 AM PDT by TommyDale (More Americans are killed each day in the U.S. by abortion than were killed on 9/11 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource
Some of the proposed amendments would mean big changes. One from Sens. Barack Obama (D., Ill.) and Robert Menendez (D., N.J.), would eliminate after five years the merit-based system created under the bill to decide which future immigrants would become permanent residents. Many Democrats have criticized the system for shifting too much emphasis away from family ties in favor of high-demand job skills and advanced education

Well of course they want to go back to emotion based never ending exponentially increasing mindless chain migration. The dems certainly DO NOT want intelligent higher income smart immigrants, they want socialist-indoctrinated peasants.

Mr. Cornyn, who has been critical of the bill, said immigration "overwhelmed every other issue" brought up by constituents as he toured his state during the recess. "They don't think Washington is listening to them, and they're very frustrated," he said. "If other members of the Senate are hearing what I'm hearing...I think the momentum is shifting the other way."

I suppose that is the "bill is going down in flames" part.

Personally, I thought it would have been dead and gone by now, but it isn't. What we are probably seeing is the real "big push." I would look for any dirty underhanded trick the dems and the President can come up with to ram the bill down America’s throat.

Remember, it was only about six weeks ago that we were all hearing "oh, there will be no attempts to pass immigration reform this year..."

Yea, right.

Right then our "Republican" President was lying to us and plotting in secrete with the hard core communist democrats to stab American Citizens in the back.

Bastards.


17 posted on 06/02/2007 9:25:58 AM PDT by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker

Cram it!

Instead of bitchin’ about how others voted or did not vote, try running candidates that are worth voting for.


18 posted on 06/02/2007 9:26:31 AM PDT by Petruchio (Out to Lunch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: italianquaker
Elections have consequences would a republican house pass this, good job to all that stood home and didnt vote, 12 million new Voters thank you

And would a Republican President sign this? Thank you, Mr. Bush!

19 posted on 06/02/2007 9:29:45 AM PDT by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sheana

“Republican Sen. Johnny Isakson, one of the negotiators, said about two-thirds of the people from his home state of Georgia who have contacted him are supportive or have misconceptions about the bill that can be cleared up.”

Gotta love that.... two-thirds are supportive, or just dumb.
That is what they think of us.


20 posted on 06/02/2007 9:29:48 AM PDT by kara37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson