Skip to comments.
More women feeling skeptical about Clinton's authenticity - though they wish they weren't
The Dallas Morning News ^
| July 8, 2007
| Melinda Henneberger
Posted on 07/08/2007 3:49:20 PM PDT by Eric Blair 2084
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-122 next last
To: Eric Blair 2084
It just occurred to me that if Fred Thompson is the Republican nominee, he may get some of those votes from women who can't stomach Her Heinous, because of Jeri, his wife. Jeri doesn't seem to have gotten where she was in DC by 'marrying into' the life. She became a lawyer, and, from what I've read, a successful media consultant for the GOP before she even knew Fred. So Jeri is more of a role model for young women than Hillary, who got where she is by marrying a man she knew would be ambitious enough that she could just ride to the top with him, without a whole lot of effort on her part.
It will be interesting to see Jeri out on the campaign trail, making speeches on behalf of her husband.
81
posted on
07/08/2007 7:21:47 PM PDT
by
SuziQ
To: TalBlack
Hillary Clinton doesnt have a serious shot at the presidency, and never has. That is rubbish pushed by a hopeful media. Women in NYC disliked Hillary in surprising percentages even before her first senate run. I well recall the NY Post stories on the subject. Yeah, but look at the results: she got in anyway. So who voted for her?
To: Eric Blair 2084
what’s needed is a
real woman
like
margaret thatcher.
83
posted on
07/08/2007 7:25:12 PM PDT
by
ken21
(fred.)
To: TheSpottedOwl
That's why I inserted the asterix and the disclaimer.
My mother in law is a great lady -- Irish Catholic New Jersey farm girl, and no biggod nonsense about her. She's in her 80s and still active as can be - garden club, tennis, golf, church. We all love her.
84
posted on
07/08/2007 7:26:30 PM PDT
by
AnAmericanMother
((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
To: Mad_as_heck
C’mon now, even Satan wouldn’t want to make a contract with someone as unscrupulous as Hillary.
85
posted on
07/08/2007 7:31:19 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
To: gcruse
86
posted on
07/08/2007 7:40:01 PM PDT
by
Xenalyte
(Lord, I apologize . . . and be with the starving pygmies in New Guinea amen.)
To: AnAmericanMother
Hah! It’s okay. A lot of women have a crush on Hillary and you know so much about her physically, I’m wondering about you....:)
87
posted on
07/08/2007 7:40:25 PM PDT
by
altura
To: Izzy Dunne
Remember the “Presidential knee pads?” God save me from these kind of women.............
To: AnAmericanMother
You know what, she is neither ugly nor fat. The reason I cannot stand her is she stayed married to a complete hound dog and possible rapist for years and put up with his crap just so she could ride his coattails to political power. And because she’s a liar, and a big one. “She didn’t know about Monica”. Well, if she’s THAT stupid, which for one minute I don’t believe she is, she sure as heck can’t be trusted to be President. Plus, she’s a legend in her own mind. And let’s face it, four years of her would mean four more of BILL. Egad. Please.
Positive role model for women? Hardly.
To: altura
Nope, I'm a former dancer and I work with performance horses and dogs. So I can assess structure pretty well.
If she were a horse, she'd go out of the ring in the first cut.
90
posted on
07/08/2007 7:46:31 PM PDT
by
AnAmericanMother
((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
To: greccogirl
Like I said, my problem is not with her looks but with her conduct and lack of character.
She's no prize in looks, but if she were a person of good character and honest, she would look a lot better. By the time you're 50, you have the face you deserve.
91
posted on
07/08/2007 7:47:54 PM PDT
by
AnAmericanMother
((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
To: Xenalyte
92
posted on
07/08/2007 7:49:44 PM PDT
by
gcruse
To: fieldmarshaldj; All
She is authentic. Authentically creepy. Authentically criminal. Authentically evil.I know that there are many outstanding posts past your post (#2)
Thanks to all posters and thanks to miat1111.
93
posted on
07/08/2007 7:53:01 PM PDT
by
PGalt
To: Eric Blair 2084
It cannot be a good sign for her candidacy, though, that some of these "modest boos" are coming from women who ought to be among her biggest fans.No one has any compelling reason why women ought to be her biggest fans.
94
posted on
07/08/2007 8:08:18 PM PDT
by
Styria
To: AnAmericanMother
I think it is a mistake to base our criticism of Hillary on her looks.
There are more plain, overweight and generally unattractive women out there than there are slim pretty dancers!
I saw at least ten youngish women at church today who were moderately to morbidly obese. Nobody there would win a beauty contest, not even me!
A lot of the men on Free Republic can be counted on to judge women by their looks.
I find it very inappropriate for women to do so, especially since ... in Hillary’s case ... it is a wild exaggeration, horse judging aside.
95
posted on
07/08/2007 8:14:02 PM PDT
by
altura
To: altura
Well, if you want to include the morbidly obese . . . . she's obviously not THAT, but other than Jerry Nadler and maybe Teddy Kennedy, how many morbidly obese politicians are there out there?
96
posted on
07/08/2007 8:19:31 PM PDT
by
AnAmericanMother
((Ministrix of Ye Chase, TTGC Ladies' Auxiliary (recess appointment)))
To: AnAmericanMother
Well, there’s more fatheads than fatasses.
97
posted on
07/08/2007 8:30:28 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
To: Eric Blair 2084
Because they are not stupid the reason he was Monica is because Hillary is a Lesbian she has only stayed married in order to become president. Bill is biting at the rains just so he can get back into the White House in order to screw everything with a heartbeat, he can count Hillary out on that one.
To: Eric Blair 2084
In order to BE a “liberal” (in the current sense), don’t you HAVE to be intellectually dishonest?
99
posted on
07/08/2007 8:38:09 PM PDT
by
bannie
(The Good Guys cannot win when they're the only ones to play by the rules.)
To: potlatch; devolve; ntnychik; dixiechick2000; Eric Blair 2084
100
posted on
07/08/2007 8:58:47 PM PDT
by
PhilDragoo
(Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-122 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson