Posted on 08/17/2007 5:48:54 AM PDT by OCCASparky
actually, not a bad idea. let census bureau gather data on illegals.. where they live, how many they are, etc... then pass data to ICE.
if they start raiding during the census, people may be less cooperative.
Somehow, I don’t think illegals want to be included in the Census. It would make more sense to have ICE do the counting.
Why is it the Census Bureau’s job to count illegals? That count should have no bearing on the representation and benefits alloted to legal citizens. It seems to me that counting illegals is precisely ICE’s job.
So should the police stop arresting criminals because the Census Bureau wants to make sure then get counted?
The answer will be: NO! Or at least it should be. Immigration enforcement should be prioritized higher than the Census count.
Also the Dims need to know how many new voter registration cards to print!
Also the Dims need to know how many new voter registration cards to print!
Does it say that in the Constitution? I don't remember that part.
WHAT Raids?
Another ploy by the White House to keep their “buddies” here in the country ???
Extra congressional seats could be going to states that have the most criminal aliens under this policy. Not good. Not that most illegals would allow a census person in i’d think. Those folks ain’t exactly fond of government officials who aren’t giving handouts.
This seems a little fuzzy to me. Can some Constitutional scholars out there help me out with Article II, Section I and the Fourteenth Amendment? Is it really required that illegals be counted? If so, why don't states like Rhode Island just bus a bunch of people in for the count to get their numbers up?
“The Census Bureau wants immigration agents to suspend enforcement raids during the 2010 census so the government can better count illegal immigrants.”
This is a joke right? Where are these people heads? Stored in the pantry.
Senseless Bureau.
Can some Constitutional scholars out there help me out with Article II, Section I Article I, Section II and the Fourteenth Amendment? Is it really required that illegals be counted? If so, why don't states like Rhode Island just bus a bunch of people in for the count to get their numbers up?
Unfortunately the word (free) ‘Persons’ is used in place of ‘citizens’. It’s basically a head count irrespective of citizenship status. An serious oversight on the part of the drafters IMO.
Well they weren't perfect and couldn't foretell every challenge (Sorry Ron Paul supporters). Fortunately they left us with an amendment process which although difficult is probably the only way to legally deal with this issue... along with enforcing the law so illegals aren't here for the head count in the first place.
ONly problem - illegals generally avoid census taking anyway...
The point is - our own government is intentionally NOT enforcing the LAW.
Maybe I’m just an idiot...but why would I want to count non-Americans as part of the census? If the guy has a visa...it might be in the gray area where it makes some sense...but why would I count a bunch of Indian students at Auburn university who are there for four years and have them edge up Alabama’s population? Seems to me that we’ve got this out of whack.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.