1 posted on
09/07/2007 8:47:48 AM PDT by
grundle
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: grundle
Uh, what country is this in?.................
2 posted on
09/07/2007 8:52:18 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(ALL that CARBON in ALL that oil & coal was once in the atmospere. We're just putting it back!)
To: grundle
“Grabbing a 12-gauge shotgun, he fired at the fleeing teens.”
Dummy. If they are in fact fleeing, they pose no threat of grave bodily harm or death.
4 posted on
09/07/2007 8:52:41 AM PDT by
taxed2death
(A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
To: grundle; Red Badger
The teens were “in retreat” which in Pennsylvania means you are breaking the law by shooting them.
5 posted on
09/07/2007 8:53:30 AM PDT by
Clemenza
(Rudy Giuliani, like Pesto and Seattle, belongs in the scrap heap of '90s Culture)
To: grundle
7 posted on
09/07/2007 8:55:01 AM PDT by
RightWhale
(It's Brecht's donkey, not mine)
To: grundle
Sadly, the laws in many jurisdictions state that even a robbed homeowner may not fire at a fleeing miscreant.
Of course, most of those criminals are never caught — unless they report to the ER with a load of birdshot in their asses.
If this does go to trial, hope the jury consists of former robbed homeowners.
To: grundle
Grabbing a 12-gauge shotgun, he fired at the fleeing teens. You have to at least yell "They're coming right for us" to claim self defense.
11 posted on
09/07/2007 8:56:29 AM PDT by
KarlInOhio
(May the heirs of Charles Martel and Jan Sobieski rise up again to defend Europe.)
To: DaveLoneRanger
To: grundle
There isn’t a Pittsburgh in the UK is there?
18 posted on
09/07/2007 9:00:45 AM PDT by
fweingart
(Tom Tancredo Will Get The Job Done! (PS: I Don't Like The Clintons.))
To: grundle
Dummy. If they are in fact fleeing, they pose no threat of grave bodily harm or death
There's no "fleeing felon" law in PA?
19 posted on
09/07/2007 9:00:50 AM PDT by
Truth'sBabyGirl
(Bucknell class of 2003, Fordham Law 2006)
To: grundle
If the kids hadn't been running away, he probably wouldn't have been charged. Still, it seems unfair to charge him.
Carolyn
20 posted on
09/07/2007 9:01:04 AM PDT by
CDHart
("It's too late to work within the system and too early to shoot the b@#$%^&s."--Claire Wolfe)
To: grundle
Jury nullification time....
To: grundle
"Grabbing a 12-gauge shotgun, he fired at the fleeing teens."It's not self-defense if they're running away.
Of course, the reason they were running away was because he trumped their BB-guns with a shotgun and raised them a dozen pellets of buckshot.
28 posted on
09/07/2007 9:04:25 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
To: grundle
‘Grabbing a 12-gauge shotgun, he fired at the fleeing teens. ‘
If they were fleeing, by definition he wasn’t in ‘fear of death or serious injury’ and as such he’s going to jail, and will most likely lose his home and everything else in the inevitable civil litigation.
Not saying its ‘right’ just noting thats the legal precedent and applicable laws in the year 2007 in America.
37 posted on
09/07/2007 9:25:02 AM PDT by
Badeye
(You know its a kook site when they ban the word 'kook')
To: grundle
Say what? Say what? People out to march on the police station and take it over BY force!
38 posted on
09/07/2007 9:25:19 AM PDT by
Doc Savage
("You couldn't tame me, but you taught me.................")
To: grundle
According to police, Mr. Iannitelli is being charged with attempted homicide, aggravated assault and reckless endangerment.According to most people with at least 3 working brain cells, the police in this case should be charged with attempted intelligence, aggravated ineptitude, and reckless stupidity....
90 posted on
09/07/2007 11:47:08 AM PDT by
dirtbiker
(I'm a liberal's worst nightmare: a redneck with a pickup, a library card, and a conceal carry permi)
To: grundle
Proof Positive why EVERY STATE should adopt the Castle Doctrine
98 posted on
09/07/2007 12:09:09 PM PDT by
ulm1
(“There are scandals that need to be addressed. Republicans address them, Democrats re-elect them.”)
To: grundle
99 posted on
09/07/2007 12:13:56 PM PDT by
Dick Vomer
(liberals suck....... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.,)
To: grundle
So, because they are "fleeing" means they can't point their weapons to the rear and squeeze off a couple of rounds?
This is bs. Anytime I am accosted, or my house invaded, by firearm toting criminals, I'll do my best to insure that they are DEAD firearm toting criminals.
102 posted on
09/07/2007 12:21:05 PM PDT by
Just another Joe
(Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
To: grundle
Actually, taking them on the wing is more sporting. I’d hope that would be a mitigating circumstance.
118 posted on
09/07/2007 6:25:40 PM PDT by
Nachoman
(My guns and my ammo, they comfort me.)
To: grundle
“Grabbing a 12-gauge shotgun, he fired at the fleeing teens.”
There was no reason for that. No sympathy from me for either parties.
120 posted on
09/07/2007 6:47:53 PM PDT by
Zeon Cowboy
(Pardon Ramos and Compean NOW! // Duncan Hunter '08)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
