Posted on 09/16/2007 3:25:02 PM PDT by paltz
President Bush has settled on retired federal judge Michael B. Mukasey to replace Alberto Gonzales as Attorney General, two sources familiar with the decision said Sunday.
The appointment of Mukasey, 66, considered a law-and-order conservative and authority on national security issues, could come as early as Monday morning, the sources said.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
I wouldn’t be surprised that the dems won’t approve anyone.
Huh... who?! What’s the bio on this guy?
I was hoping for Ted Olsen. This sounds like a wimp out.
Harry Reid: “We don’t know who this guy is but we automatically oppose him”.
We will probably get another special council on everything that moves.
Probably is. I heard Schmucky Screwmer has already given his seal of approval.
Bush Picks Mukasey As Attorney General
Sep 16, 6:23 PM (ET)
By DEB RIECHMANN
|
WASHINGTON (AP) - President Bush has settled on Michael B. Mukasey, a retired federal judge from New York, to replace Alberto Gonzales as attorney general and will announce his selection Monday, a source familiar with the president's decision said Sunday evening.
Mukasey, who has handled terrorist cases in the U.S. legal system for more than a decade, would become the nation's top law enforcement officer.
The 66-year-old New York native, who is a legal adviser to GOP presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani, would take charge of a Justice Department where morale is low following months of investigations into the firings of nine U.S. attorneys and Gonzales' sworn testimony on the Bush administration's terrorist surveillance program.
Bush supporters say Mukasey, who was chief judge of the high-profile courthouse in Manhattan for six years, has impeccable credentials, is a strong, law-and-order jurist, especially on national security issues, and will restore confidence in the Justice Department.
Bush critics see the Mukasey nomination as evidence of Bush's weakened political clout as he heads into the final 15 months of his presidency. It's unclear how Senate Democrats will view Mukasey's credentials, but early indications are that he will face less opposition than a more hardline, partisan candidate like Ted Olson.
Mukasey has received past endorsements from Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer, who is from Mukasey's home state. And in 2005, the liberal Alliance for Justice put Mukasey on a list of four judges who, if chosen for the Supreme Court, would show the president's commitment to nominating people who could be supported by both Democrats and Republicans.
Last week, some Senate Democrats threatened to block the confirmation of Olson, who represented Bush before the Supreme Court in the contested 2000 election. Democratic senators have theorized that Bush might nominate Mukasey, in part, because he wanted to avoid a bruising confirmation battle.
The possibility that Bush would nominate Mukasey, however, inflamed some supporters on the GOP's right flank, who have given Mukasey less-than-enthusiastic reviews. Some legal conservatives and Republican activists have expressed reservations about Mukasey's legal record and past endorsements from liberals, and are already drafting a strategy to oppose his confirmation.
Mukasey was nominated to the federal bench in 1987 by President Reagan. He was chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York before he rejoined the New York law firm of Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler as a partner in September 2006.
|
In the 1996 sentencing of co-conspirators in the case, Mukasey accused the sheik of trying to spread death "in a scale unseen in this country since the Civil War." He then sentenced the blind sheik to life.
The Mukasey nomination could be Bush's last major Cabinet appointment.
Friday was the last day of Gonzales' 2- 1/2 years at Justice. Solicitor General Paul Clement will serve as acting attorney general until the Senate confirms Gonzales' replacement.
Gonzales' conflicting public statements about the firings of the U.S. prosecutors led Democrats and Republicans alike to question his honesty. Their charges were compounded by his later sworn testimony about the terrorist surveillance program, which was contradicted by FBI Director Robert S. Mueller and former senior Justice Department officials.
A congressional investigation into the firings recently shifted its focus onto whether the attorney general lied to Congress. The Justice Department also has opened an internal investigation into the matters.
At first, the president backed his embattled attorney general. At an Aug. 9 news conference, Bush said, "Why would I hold somebody accountable who has done nothing wrong?"
A little more than two weeks later, Bush announced that he had "reluctantly" accepted the resignation of Gonzales, who followed John Ashcroft's four-year stint as Bush's first attorney general. Bush said Gonzales, his loyal colleague from Texas who was his White House counsel before heading to Justice, had worked tirelessly to keep the nation safe.
Bush said opposition lawmakers treated Gonzales unfairly for political reasons. "It's sad that we live in a time when a talented and honorable person like Alberto Gonzales is impeded from doing important work because his good name was dragged through the mud," Bush said.
Yes they would....They would unanimously vote for a pot smoking hippy liberal with little education...like Ward Chruchill or so other commie.
It does to me too.
Yawn.
so = some
Bush is well aware that the Dems will hate anyone anyway, whether he's on an 'approved' list or not. Dems are hypocrites no matter what. But Bush wants an AG right now, and doesn't want a protracted fight for the good of the country. I think it's really that simple. Mukasey doesn't seem like a bad choice at all. I liked Olson as well. It doesn't seem like a Harriot Miers nomination. I think just take a breath and see what this guy is made of when he speaks.
So was Sandra Day O’Connor.
All take it easy. He will be an AG for 15 months and that is all. He is not going to contribute to anything as in the case 99.9% of AG in US history who no one remember their names and because they did nothing.
Agree 100%.
He should’ve just waited until the next recess and slipped Olson through on a recess appointment. At this point it doesn’t matter whether or not it’s a recess appointment or a regular approval— both expire at the end of this term anyway.
West Wing leakes Olson. Reid threatens Olson. Bush backs down.
“”I was hoping for Ted Olsen. This sounds like a wimp out.”
Perhaps Ted Olson didn’t want to go through the dog and pony show. I sure wouldn’t. The work of the Justice Department is too important to hold it up with the mockery that is called Senate confirmation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.