Skip to comments.
Earthquake -- Magnitude 3.6 - OREGON
USGS ^
| 09-23-07
| USGS.gov
Posted on 09/25/2007 7:10:24 PM PDT by Salvation
Earthquake -- Magnitude 3.6 - OREGON
Earthquake Details
Magnitude |
3.6 |
Date-Time |
- Monday, September 24, 2007 at 06:20:54 UTC
- Sunday, September 23, 2007 at 11:20:54 PM at epicenter
|
Location |
45.099°N, 123.030°W |
Depth |
22.2 km (13.8 miles) set by location program |
Region |
OREGON |
Distances |
- 8 km (5 miles) NW (313°) from Brooks, OR
- 10 km (6 miles) NNW (333°) from Labish Village, OR
- 10 km (6 miles) W (265°) from Gervais, OR
- 19 km (12 miles) N (360°) from Salem, OR
- 56 km (35 miles) SSW (213°) from Portland, OR
|
Location Uncertainty |
horizontal +/- 1.5 km (0.9 miles); depth fixed by location program |
Parameters |
Nst= 31, Nph= 37, Dmin=25 km, Rmss=0.32 sec, Gp= 47°, M-type=duration magnitude (Md), Version=1 |
Source |
|
Event ID |
uw09240620 |
TOPICS: US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: earthquake; ooooooo3point6; oregon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
For all of you who like to track these things!
1
posted on
09/25/2007 7:10:28 PM PDT
by
Salvation
To: Salvation
This was less than 20 miles n/nw of me. I am only 5 miles from Brooks.
Close to 45th meridian too! Any meaning to that?
2
posted on
09/25/2007 7:12:20 PM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: abcraghead; aimhigh; Archie Bunker on steroids; bicycle thug; blackie; coffeebreak; ...
Oregon Ping Please notify me via FReepmail if you would like to be added to or taken off the Oregon Ping List.
3
posted on
09/25/2007 7:13:39 PM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
I was sound asleep. Didn’t feel a thing.
4
posted on
09/25/2007 7:14:42 PM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Salvation
Pressure release hopefully.
5
posted on
09/25/2007 7:15:02 PM PDT
by
kinoxi
To: Salvation
6
posted on
09/25/2007 7:16:37 PM PDT
by
maine-iac7
("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
To: Salvation
I don’t feel them until they are a 5.
7
posted on
09/25/2007 7:16:49 PM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(Buy a Mac ...)
To: Salvation
8
posted on
09/25/2007 7:18:23 PM PDT
by
BunnySlippers
(Buy a Mac ...)
To: Salvation
That's a real small one. See how close it is to any of the volcanoes in Oregon. That might raise the level of interest. It's a full moon tonight, so the earth is getting nicely pulled in 2 directions.
9
posted on
09/25/2007 7:20:33 PM PDT
by
Myrddin
To: Salvation
In California a 3.6 wouldn’t make any news source whatsoever
10
posted on
09/25/2007 7:23:21 PM PDT
by
TaMoDee
To: kinoxi
I dont live in an earthquake subjected area:
Im confused
what is the difference between and earthquake and relieving pressure? Thought that and earthquake was mother natures way of relieving pressure? Same question about and after shock
how do we know that something called and after shock is not another earthquake?
If you or anyone here would have a link that would explain all this to me, would save them a lot of typing.
Thanks.
11
posted on
09/25/2007 7:28:03 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(Fred Thompson '08)
To: BunnySlippers
Thanks for posting that it is very helpful. Having been trough a few here in California I have long thought anything less then 5.0 is hardly worth mentioning.
The posted chart confirms that.
12
posted on
09/25/2007 7:31:23 PM PDT
by
Michael.SF.
("democrat" -- 'one who panders to the crude and mindless whims of the masses " - Joseph J. Ellis)
To: doc1019
what is the difference between and earthquake and relieving pressure? A small one like this (3.6) is like an SBD "fart". It relieves the pressure. The big ones, like an 8.0 or thereabout, are more like a ... well, do you get the picture? They're both earthquakes but one is constructive and the other is destructive.
To: maine-iac7; BunnySlippers
But for Oregon anything close to a 4 is big. LOL!
14
posted on
09/25/2007 7:41:17 PM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Salvation
Yeah ... but I did read a number of articles about the consequences of a big NE quake. Very bad.
To: doc1019
Same question about and after shock
how do we know that something called and after shock is not another earthquake?
Basically, they do an after-the-fact analysis of the situation. Start with the original earthquake. If afterwards, you have a succession of smaller earthquakes, those are aftershocks. However, if you have a larger earthquake after your original quake, then the first quake is then referred to as a 'foreshock.'
I know that this doesn't sound very scientific, but we have a lot to learn about earthquakes. To have a better determination of aftershock/foreshock, you'd have to understand the causes well enough to predict them, and we're far from that.
(I've felt three quakes in the last month that were approximately 4s--mild, but it raises my adrenaline level.)
16
posted on
09/25/2007 7:52:50 PM PDT
by
Mariebl
To: liege
Thanks for the into, I will research further. Im an information freak and need to know more.
17
posted on
09/25/2007 7:53:32 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(Fred Thompson '08)
To: Mariebl
Thanks, any information is information that improves my knowledge library.
18
posted on
09/25/2007 7:56:20 PM PDT
by
doc1019
(Fred Thompson '08)
To: Salvation
“Close to the 45th meridian too! Any meaning to that?”
A meridian is a great circle through the geographical poles of the earth. (the lines are vertical on a chart),
I think you meant close to the 45th parallel.
To answer your question, No.
To: Cold Heart
You’re right. I got the wrong name. 45th parallel. It’s between Mount St. Helen’s and all the other dormant or active volcanoes in Oregon. Maybe closer to some in Eastern Oregon that I could say accurately.
20
posted on
09/25/2007 8:14:12 PM PDT
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson