Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Earthquake -- Magnitude 3.6 - OREGON
USGS ^ | 09-23-07 | USGS.gov

Posted on 09/25/2007 7:10:24 PM PDT by Salvation

Earthquake -- Magnitude 3.6 - OREGON
 
 

Earthquake Details

Magnitude 3.6
Date-Time
  • Monday, September 24, 2007 at 06:20:54 UTC
  • Sunday, September 23, 2007 at 11:20:54 PM at epicenter
Location 45.099°N, 123.030°W
Depth 22.2 km (13.8 miles) set by location program
Region OREGON
Distances
  • 8 km (5 miles) NW (313°) from Brooks, OR
  • 10 km (6 miles) NNW (333°) from Labish Village, OR
  • 10 km (6 miles) W (265°) from Gervais, OR
  • 19 km (12 miles) N (360°) from Salem, OR
  • 56 km (35 miles) SSW (213°) from Portland, OR
Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 1.5 km (0.9 miles); depth fixed by location program
Parameters Nst= 31, Nph= 37, Dmin=25 km, Rmss=0.32 sec, Gp= 47°,
M-type=duration magnitude (Md), Version=1
Source
Event ID uw09240620
 
 


TOPICS: US: Oregon
KEYWORDS: earthquake; ooooooo3point6; oregon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
For all of you who like to track these things!
1 posted on 09/25/2007 7:10:28 PM PDT by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Salvation

This was less than 20 miles n/nw of me. I am only 5 miles from Brooks.

Close to 45th meridian too! Any meaning to that?


2 posted on 09/25/2007 7:12:20 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abcraghead; aimhigh; Archie Bunker on steroids; bicycle thug; blackie; coffeebreak; ...
Oregon Ping

Please notify me via FReepmail if you would like to be added to or taken off the Oregon Ping List.

3 posted on 09/25/2007 7:13:39 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

I was sound asleep. Didn’t feel a thing.


4 posted on 09/25/2007 7:14:42 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Pressure release hopefully.


5 posted on 09/25/2007 7:15:02 PM PDT by kinoxi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

3.6 puny


6 posted on 09/25/2007 7:16:37 PM PDT by maine-iac7 ("...but you can't fool all of the people all of the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

I don’t feel them until they are a 5.


7 posted on 09/25/2007 7:16:49 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (Buy a Mac ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

8 posted on 09/25/2007 7:18:23 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (Buy a Mac ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
That's a real small one. See how close it is to any of the volcanoes in Oregon. That might raise the level of interest. It's a full moon tonight, so the earth is getting nicely pulled in 2 directions.
9 posted on 09/25/2007 7:20:33 PM PDT by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

In California a 3.6 wouldn’t make any news source whatsoever


10 posted on 09/25/2007 7:23:21 PM PDT by TaMoDee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kinoxi

I don’t live in an earthquake subjected area:

I’m confused … what is the difference between and earthquake and “relieving pressure”? Thought that and earthquake was mother natures way of relieving pressure? Same question about and after shock … how do we know that something called and “after shock” is not another earthquake?

If you or anyone here would have a link that would explain all this to me, would save them a lot of typing.

Thanks.


11 posted on 09/25/2007 7:28:03 PM PDT by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BunnySlippers
Thanks for posting that it is very helpful. Having been trough a few here in California I have long thought anything less then 5.0 is hardly worth mentioning.

The posted chart confirms that.

12 posted on 09/25/2007 7:31:23 PM PDT by Michael.SF. ("democrat" -- 'one who panders to the crude and mindless whims of the masses " - Joseph J. Ellis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
what is the difference between and earthquake and “relieving pressure”?

A small one like this (3.6) is like an SBD "fart". It relieves the pressure. The big ones, like an 8.0 or thereabout, are more like a ... well, do you get the picture? They're both earthquakes but one is constructive and the other is destructive.

13 posted on 09/25/2007 7:39:50 PM PDT by bubbacluck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: maine-iac7; BunnySlippers

But for Oregon anything close to a 4 is big. LOL!


14 posted on 09/25/2007 7:41:17 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Yeah ... but I did read a number of articles about the consequences of a big NE quake. Very bad.


15 posted on 09/25/2007 7:44:23 PM PDT by BunnySlippers (Buy a Mac ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: doc1019
Same question about and after shock … how do we know that something called and “after shock” is not another earthquake?

Basically, they do an after-the-fact analysis of the situation. Start with the original earthquake. If afterwards, you have a succession of smaller earthquakes, those are aftershocks. However, if you have a larger earthquake after your original quake, then the first quake is then referred to as a 'foreshock.'

I know that this doesn't sound very scientific, but we have a lot to learn about earthquakes. To have a better determination of aftershock/foreshock, you'd have to understand the causes well enough to predict them, and we're far from that.

(I've felt three quakes in the last month that were approximately 4s--mild, but it raises my adrenaline level.)
16 posted on 09/25/2007 7:52:50 PM PDT by Mariebl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: liege

Thanks for the into, I will research further. I’m an information freak and need to know more.


17 posted on 09/25/2007 7:53:32 PM PDT by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mariebl

Thanks, any information is information that improves my knowledge library.


18 posted on 09/25/2007 7:56:20 PM PDT by doc1019 (Fred Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
“Close to the 45th meridian too! Any meaning to that?”

A meridian is a great circle through the geographical poles of the earth. (the lines are vertical on a chart),
I think you meant close to the 45th parallel.

To answer your question, No.

19 posted on 09/25/2007 8:10:01 PM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart

You’re right. I got the wrong name. 45th parallel. It’s between Mount St. Helen’s and all the other dormant or active volcanoes in Oregon. Maybe closer to some in Eastern Oregon that I could say accurately.


20 posted on 09/25/2007 8:14:12 PM PDT by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson