Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Post-Debate Blogger Reaction
Fred08 ^ | October 9, 2007 | Sean

Posted on 10/09/2007 8:57:33 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

Redstate’s Erick Erickson interviewed campaign manager Bill Lacy after the debate.

Marc Ambinder saw things very well for Fred:

First time debater Fred Thompson seemed well prepared and did not give in to fruity abstractions when talking about obtuse topics. Some of his rivals may have assumed that he would wither under tough questions from the moderators: he did not. Some journalists may have assumed that he would slouch or tire; he seemed energetic. If this was a test, artificial as it may have been, Thompson passed it. He demonstrated that his campaign has density. He did not fall for any of the traps that the moderators laid for him.

Chris Cillizza called Fred the “Tone Setter.”

Ed Morrissey focused on Chris Matthews bad behavior:

The first debate with Fred Thompson was expected to reveal whether the lanky actor had what it takes to make a national run for the office. Instead, it revealed Chris Matthews as a hack of the first order, one who tried his best to torpedo Thompson — and failed utterly. He got so desparate that he demanded to know whether Thompson knew who the Canadian Prime Minister was — and he did. Matthews grew so frustrated that he openly critiqued one of Thompson’s answer for being too detailed, which prompted a scolding from Thompson.

Fred did very well with the Heading Right crowd:

macranger:

It’s Fred’s day either way. All eyes were on him, he did well, even after Matthews needled him over WMD.

Rick Moran:

I would say that Fred and Rudy have shown themselves off the best.

Matt Lewis gave Fred the line of the night: “… It was getting a little boring without me.”

Kathryn Jean Lopez: “And the Winner Is… Fred Thompson.”

UPDATE: Here’s more positive reaction to Fred’s debate performance:

Rob at Say Anything: “Can you say ‘front runner?’”

Docweldon at Power Line Forum wrote,

Fred has said many,many things that I agree with and seems to have a core set of beliefs and rules that guide his answers.

Ed Morrissey added to his post saying,

I guess I had that about right, didn’t I? Also, I suggested that “the candidate who can push back best against Matthews’ potential low blows should be strongly considered for the nomination.” I think Fred qualifies as someone who can fight for himself.

For some of Fred’s highlights, including taking on Chris Matthews check out Hot Air.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Politics/Elections; US: Michigan; US: Tennessee; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: christophermatthews; debates; economy; electionpresident; elections; fred; fredthompson; gop; gopdebates; mittromney; paulestinians; republicans; ronpaul; rudygiuliani; terrorism; thompson; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last
Go FRed!
1 posted on 10/09/2007 8:57:37 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I thought he did very well.


2 posted on 10/09/2007 8:58:53 PM PDT by MamaB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MamaB
I agree! FRed's the REAL DEAL!! Fred08 - Contribute Now
3 posted on 10/09/2007 9:00:25 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Security * Unity * Prosperity | Fred08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Some journalists may have assumed that he would slouch or tire; he seemed energetic.

Seemed the antithesis of "energetic" to me. I hope his presentation improves in future debates. He is a good man.

4 posted on 10/09/2007 9:03:16 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

There was nothing soporific about the way he came back at Matthews . That was trial-lawyer rattlesnake quick , and that is high praise from another old goat lawyer .


5 posted on 10/09/2007 9:07:46 PM PDT by kbennkc (For those who have fought for it , freedom has a flavor the protected will never know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
A not-so-serious debate review.
6 posted on 10/09/2007 9:09:24 PM PDT by inkling (exurbanleague.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kbennkc
I hope the MSM/democrats (excuse my redundancy) keep “misunderestimating” FRed, all the way to his inauguration day...
7 posted on 10/09/2007 9:10:55 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Security * Unity * Prosperity | Fred08.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Positive from what I saw.romney stepped on his... never mind.


8 posted on 10/09/2007 9:17:51 PM PDT by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve86
Seemed the antithesis of "energetic" to me.

I don't want energetic. I want someone I can respect and trust. And I also want someone who doesn't want the job so much that they'll act like a show pony to get it.

9 posted on 10/09/2007 9:18:09 PM PDT by Texas Federalist (Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Did you read the live blogging of the debate? Really good stuff.


10 posted on 10/09/2007 9:18:16 PM PDT by perfect_rovian_storm (John Cox 2008: Because Duncan Hunter just isn't obscure enough for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Federalist
I didn’t say I wanted someone with ADHD.
11 posted on 10/09/2007 9:21:10 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: imahawk
romney stepped on his... never mind.

Why? Just because the law firm of Trantolo & Trantolo is going to decide whether we invade Iran?

12 posted on 10/09/2007 9:22:32 PM PDT by Texas Federalist (Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: steve86
I didn’t say I wanted someone with ADHD.

My bad. You had me thinking you wanted zippy the squirrel.

13 posted on 10/09/2007 9:23:32 PM PDT by Texas Federalist (Fred!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Texas Federalist

I think Fred is a good man and probably up to the job.


14 posted on 10/09/2007 9:26:03 PM PDT by steve86 (Acerbic by nature, not nurture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Texas Federalist

Nope, they want to see FRed doing the “Frenetic Ferret” dance right along with some of the other contestants.

Too bad. FRed will remain FRed.


15 posted on 10/09/2007 9:41:27 PM PDT by Politicalmom (Of the potential GOP front runners, FT has one of the better records on immigration.- NumbersUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

It’s getting to be about time to pick a candidate who can actually win... With regret, I concede that Tancredo is unlikely even to win here in Colorado. I’m not enthused about Fred, but at this point the name of the game is finding someone to stop Rudy. I’ve soured a bit on Mitt, but I think either he or Fred would do very well against Hillary, as well as be respectable CICs, and I’ve decided I will support whichever one of them seems most likely to stop Giuliani. That may seem like a soul-less, unenthusiastic endorsement based on triangulation, and I suppose it is, but with a Rudy presidency we would lose even if we won.

I’m still waiting for Fred to wow me, but I can support him and feel comfortable casting my vote for him. He seems like a man of principle, which I value above everything else.


16 posted on 10/09/2007 9:48:12 PM PDT by COgamer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

FredHead BUMP!


17 posted on 10/09/2007 9:50:53 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve86

Hah, but but..


18 posted on 10/09/2007 9:52:19 PM PDT by MaxMax (God Bless America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Tired? Old? Lazy? Lethargic?

Review the tapes. FRed stood there rocking and bouncing on the balls of his feet the whole night...like a spring, waiting to go BOING!


19 posted on 10/09/2007 10:01:05 PM PDT by papasmurf (I'm for Free, Fair, and Open trade. America needs to stand by it's true Friend. Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COgamer

I’m with ya’ on Tanc. I wished he’d have taken a year’s worth of speech therapy first. I love the guy.


20 posted on 10/09/2007 10:07:09 PM PDT by papasmurf (I'm for Free, Fair, and Open trade. America needs to stand by it's true Friend. Israel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson