Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans 2008: Giuliani 31%, Thompson 26%
Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research ^ | 11/02/2007

Posted on 11/03/2007 10:34:50 AM PDT by Brices Crossroads

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last
To: Lucius Cornelius Sulla
My point was that regardless of the numbers, every single poll shows that Fred has gone down in the past month (to his pre announcement numbers or worse), and that others, in this case Huckabee and Romney are the beneficiaries. Even your Rasmussen poll shows the exact same trend. Oct 1st Fred was at 25% today he is at 17%.
That is an 8% drop, and Huckabee picked up 6% with Mitt at 2%.

Rudy and Fred are close, but it was the trend I was looking at not necessarily the numbers.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2008__1/daily_presidential_tracking_polling_history

And if you take a average of all the polls, Rudy leads by 13.2%

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/republican_presidential_nomination-192.html#polls

41 posted on 11/03/2007 11:50:54 AM PDT by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Fred

Fred - Mitt Romney is a fine family man. I am proud to support him. Your cartoon is silly but not surprising.


42 posted on 11/03/2007 11:51:52 AM PDT by Saundra Duffy (Romney Rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
You might be right about Mitt, I hadn't been following that as closely as Huckabee. But in every poll this week Fred has seen a significant decrease in support over the past month. I was just curious as to where it was going, and according to this poll it was Mitt and Huckabee.

Rasmussen has Huckabee with a significant increase (+6) and a slight portion (2%) to Mitt, while none of the others seem to be picking it up. Rudy is stuck around the same numbers,and McCain, despite his success in head to head polls with the Beast seems right around the same.

I was just following the trends of the race, not necessarily the exact numbers.

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_2008__1/daily_presidential_tracking_polling_history

43 posted on 11/03/2007 11:57:05 AM PDT by codercpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: barnicus; All
If illegal immigration is an important issue to you, you may want to visit this thread:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1920405/posts

44 posted on 11/03/2007 11:58:35 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

“Mitt . . . no real core beliefs”

You have got to be kidding, right? I never thought I’d hear anyone (with a brain and half a heart) say Mitt Romney has “no real core beliefs”.

Mitt Romney is a fine man, with a fine family, and he does not deserve to be maligned and ridiculed.

Go, Mitt - all the way to the White House. While petty silly FReepers are insulting him and touting a johnny-come-lately candidate, Mitt Romney is working his heart out quietly but steadily winning over conservative voters one by one, county by county, state by state. He actually has a plan for victory and has the ability to focus.

Go, Mitt!


45 posted on 11/03/2007 12:02:50 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy (Romney Rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Fred - Mitt Romney is a fine family man. I am proud to support him. Your cartoon is silly but not surprising.

No more silly than your continuous attacks on Fred. For what it is worth, Mitt IS gonna to be far more susceptible to attacks of being a flip-flopper than any of the other candidates.

46 posted on 11/03/2007 12:04:47 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Mitt Romney is a fine man, with a fine family, and he does not deserve to be maligned and ridiculed.

So you are the arbitrator of which candidates deserves to be ridiculed and which ones don't? Really, if you don't want your candidate to be ridiculed, perhaps you should think about not ridiculing the other candidates. Just a thought.

47 posted on 11/03/2007 12:07:21 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Always Right

“continuous attacks on Fred”

Where have you been, FReeper pal. I decided a long time ago I do not need to attack Fred - he’s failing all by himself.


48 posted on 11/03/2007 12:07:28 PM PDT by Saundra Duffy (Romney Rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Which Mitt are you referencing? The one that ran to the left of Ted Kennedy? The one that brought on gay marriage in Massachusetts as governor and was a sanctuary-for-illegals proponent? Or the “new” Mitt that wants to be president and is trying to get to the right of Strom Thurmond? I’m so confused!
49 posted on 11/03/2007 12:09:41 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
Where have you been, FReeper pal. I decided a long time ago I do not need to attack Fred - he’s failing all by himself.

I have to say your posting history looks a lot better than what it was, but you still have your moments.

50 posted on 11/03/2007 12:11:56 PM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
"Where have you been, FReeper pal. I decided a long time ago I do not need to attack Fred - he’s failing all by himself."

Yes, that 2nd place nationally and in California & Florida, along with 1st place in South Carolina and just about ANY Southern state that has had a poll..that sure connotes failure in my book. All without spending as much as Mitt's yearly temple tithes! Amazing!

51 posted on 11/03/2007 12:14:22 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; Clara Lou; Petronski; Brices Crossroads
Your guy has no shot in spite of spending several fortunes to try to get people to like him. Sorry, those are the facts. The truth hurts, but it is still the truth.

If all you Romney has no shot Fredheads put your money where your mouth is on Fred, why, FR will be loaded with millionaires. At 7.7% chance of winning the GOP nomination, it would take only $77 to win a thousand!

Petronski, when you put your Thompson winnings into a skybox at Jacobs Field, make to send me taunting I-told-you-so cellphone pics from your box. ;-)

Free Image Hosting at allyoucanupload.com

52 posted on 11/03/2007 12:16:05 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

How many presidents has Intrade elected? I thought so...


53 posted on 11/03/2007 12:20:55 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: trisham
Dear trisham,

“I’m planning on donating again, but I’m not sure when.”

Me, too. I gotta get some of my clients to pay their bills. ;-)

“It will be my third donation as well.”

Me, too.

That’s the thing that’s going to keep Fred going. He has 100,000 folks (as of Sept 30) who have contributed on average only something more than $100. The legal limit is $2300. I think he’s getting support from a lot of rank-and-file, regular, ordinary, conservative Republican grass-roots types who can’t afford to plunk down a couple of grand out of a single paycheck, but who CAN budget $25, $50, $100 at a throw, every month or two or so.

I think that he’ll raise close to a hundred million in relatively small amounts.


sitetest

54 posted on 11/03/2007 12:27:22 PM PDT by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: sitetest

It’s funny. I’ve never donated to a campaign before, but I believe in Fred and I think this is an important election.


55 posted on 11/03/2007 12:31:42 PM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads
No margin of error was provided.

Odd.

56 posted on 11/03/2007 12:34:56 PM PDT by gitmo (From now on, ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which I will not put.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: codercpc

“My point was that regardless of the numbers, every single poll shows that Fred has gone down in the past month (to his pre announcement numbers or worse), and that others, in this case Huckabee and Romney are the beneficiaries.”

Your analysis is flawed. In response to the pounding Fred has taken from the MSM and elitist New York crowd, his numbers have eroded temporarily, as people who are paying attention (which is still a minority) look around. But the erosion on this poll is within the MOE. Huckabee, a complete unknown with more baggage than a wagon train, has gotten a bump, which will not last. But the fact remains that Fred is in second place. He IS the conservative alternative to Giuliani, whether you care to see it or not.

Rudy has not benefited at all, nor has Romney. Rudy’s ceiling is 25%. The battle is over who the conservative challenger to Giuliani will be. Fred is winning that one and, as the others fade closer to election day, Fred not Rudy will be the beneficiary. He is a conservative that is acceptable to all wings of the GOP, which is why he will win the nomination.


57 posted on 11/03/2007 12:40:35 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy

Only you are capable of transmogrifying the completely legitimate observation that he has no core beliefs (based on his numerous and material flip flops) into a personal attack.

I hope someone is paying you to make such silly statements. You should not do it for free.


58 posted on 11/03/2007 12:48:04 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom; Sturm Ruger; papasmurf; ejonesie22; jellybean

Ping!


59 posted on 11/03/2007 12:49:36 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (Your "dirt" on Fred is about as persuasive as a Nancy Pelosi Veteran's Day Speech)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gitmo

I think most of the Harris Interactive polls have an MOE of about 4% if my memory serves me correctly. So it is basically a dead heat.


60 posted on 11/03/2007 12:51:27 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-153 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson