Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Former generals, admirals question military gay policy
Stars and Stripes ^ | December 1, 2007 | staff reporter

Posted on 12/02/2007 4:35:26 AM PST by Daffynition

Twenty-eight retired generals and admirals released a letter on Friday urging Congress to repeal the ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ law, according to a report in Friday’s New York Times. The letter’s release marked the the 14th anniversary of the policy that allows gay men and lesbians to serve in the military but only if they keep their orientation secret.

“We respectfully urge Congress to repeal the ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy,” says the letter, a copy of which Stars and Stripes also received.

The officers said in the letter that “scholarly data show” that 65,000 gay men and lesbians now serve in the American armed forces and that there are more than 1 million gay veterans.

“They have served our nation honorably,” the letter states.

Although the signers of the letter are high-ranking, none is of the stature of Gen. John Shalikashvili, who was chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff when the policy was adopted and who now argues for its repeal, the Times noted. Shalikashvili refocused attention on the issue earlier this year when he wrote in a New York Times op-ed that conversations with military personnel had prompted him to change his position.

Through 2006, more than 10,000 people were removed from the military under the policy, according to government statistics cited by the Times.

But the number of servicemembers discharged under the policy has declined noticeably since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, dropping to 612 in fiscal 2006 from 1,227 in fiscal 2001, the paper reported.

Bryan Whitman, a Pentagon spokesman, told the Times on Thursday that there were no efforts at the Pentagon or across the military to alter the policy.


Text of the letter ...

We respectfully urge Congress to repeal the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy. Those of us signing this letter have dedicated our lives to defending the rights of our citizens to believe whatever they wish. As General Colin Powell, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs said when the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy was enacted, it is not the place of the military or those in senior leadership to make moral judgments.

Scholarly data show that there are approximately one million gay and lesbian veterans in the United States today, as well as 65,000 gays and lesbians currently serving in our armed forces. They have served our nation honorably.

We support the recent comments of another former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, General John Shalikashvili, who has concluded that repealing the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy would not harm, and would indeed help, our armed forces. As is the case in Britain, Israel, and other nations which allow gays and lesbians to serve openly, our service members are professionals who are able to work together effectively despite differences in race, gender, religion, and sexuality. Such collaboration reflects the strength and the best traditions of our democracy.

Lieutenant General Jerry Hilmes; Branch: Army

Vice Admiral Harold Koenig; Branch: Navy; Field: Medical

Vice Admiral James Zimble, Midlothian, VA; Branch: Navy; Field: Medical

Major General Leslie Burger, Vancouver, WA; Branch: Army; Field:  Medical

Major General Alexander Burgin, Salem, OR; Branch: Army NG; Field: Artillery

Major General Michael Conrad, McLean, VA; Field: Infantry

Major General James Delk, Fair Oaks, CA; Branch: Army; Field: Medical

Major General Jack Farris, New Jersey; Branch: Air Force; Field: Aviation (pilot)

Major General Fred Forster, Tennessee; Field: Aviation

Major General David Hale, Hampton Bays, NY; Field: Combat

Major General Randy Jayne, McClean, VA; Branch: Air NG; Field: Aviation (pilot)

Major General Dennis Laich, Dublin, OH; Branch: Army; Field: Military Police

Major General Dennis Malcor, Vine Grove, KY; Branch: Army; Field: Combat

Major General Michael Scotti*, Arlington, VA; Branch: Army; Field:  Medical

Major General Harry Sieben, Minnesota; Branch: Army and Air NG

Rear Admiral William Retz; Branch: Navy

Brigadier General Clara Adams-Ender, Woodbridge, VA; Branch: Army; Field:  Medical

Brigadier General Dale Barber, Waverly, NY; Branch: Army; Field: Infantry Engineer

Brigadier General Harold Bowman, Pleasant Hill, IA; Branch: Army NG; Field; Medical

Brigadier General Douglas Bradley, Diablo, CA; Branch: Army; Field: Medical

Brigadier General William Colvin; Branch: Army NG

Brigadier General Bob Hardy; Branch: Army

Brigadier General JD Johnson, Salt Lake City, UT; Branch: Army

Brigadier General Phil Peay, Utah; Field:  Engineering

Brigadier General Robert Poirot, Evergreen, CO; Branch: Army; Field: Artillery

Brigadier General Philip Pushkin, Randallstown, MD; Branch: Army NG

Brigadier General Donald Schenk, Troy, MI; Branch: Army; Field: Combat Systems

Brigadier General Daniel Wardrop, Williamsburg, VA; Field: Artillery

*General Scotti passed away in September, 2007 after agreeing to sign onto this statement. His widow has requested that he remain on the statement.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: dontaskdonttell; homosexualagenda
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

1 posted on 12/02/2007 4:35:28 AM PST by Daffynition
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Only one sea Admiral signed. Homos often end up missing morning muster.


2 posted on 12/02/2007 4:41:00 AM PST by Jacquerie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

"none is of the stature of Gen. John Shalikashvili"

A legend in his own mind.

3 posted on 12/02/2007 4:43:29 AM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

1. 28 retired flags is a drop in the bucket. I’d wager its about 1% of all those retired.
2. About 1/3 of these appear to be medical officers—not combat rated.
3. About 1/2 of these are Brigadier Generals. While that sounds impressive, BGs are often bitter ‘cause they never got that 2nd star. In some ways, that looks worse than a Colonel who never got selected for BG.
4. I don’t see any 4-stars on that list.


4 posted on 12/02/2007 4:45:38 AM PST by rbg81 (DRAIN THE SWAMP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

Shouldn’t General Bendover be on that list?


5 posted on 12/02/2007 4:47:46 AM PST by Nextrush (Proudly uncommitted in the 2008 race for president for now,, but McCain and Paul never)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition

And I say keep it the same.

There is a difference between “don’t ask, don’t tell” and serving openly.

Those who have served in the lower ranks understand that difference.

To those wishing to change it, it’s just an agenda.


6 posted on 12/02/2007 4:51:18 AM PST by PeteB570 (So why did the EO NCO have to be black? It's EO Right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rbg81
About 1/3 of these appear to be medical officers—not combat rated.

How does that matter and why?

7 posted on 12/02/2007 4:52:35 AM PST by Racehorse (Where your treasure is, there will your heart be also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Nextrush

wonder if Hitlary wrote that letter for them to sign


8 posted on 12/02/2007 4:52:55 AM PST by sure_fine (• " not one to over kill the thought process " •)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition
Gannett owned, shills for the bitch. It will happen if she becomes queen bee.
9 posted on 12/02/2007 4:54:01 AM PST by boomop1 (there you go again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
I have no doubt that many gays have served honorably.
The big question in my mind is how to maintain good order and discipline if openly gay sailors are on board Navy ships. Open berthing, very tight quarters, shared heads and showers. Or do we create ANOTHER separate setup like we had to do for women?? Just how much room do these people think there is on a Destroyer anyway?
Can also see many lost at sea incidents. Awful dark out there.
Jack
10 posted on 12/02/2007 4:56:47 AM PST by btcusn (Giving up the right to arms is a mistake a free people get to make only once.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition
How many Marines were on that list?......er. Oh none. Nevermind.

We're just to backwards and want to kill things.

11 posted on 12/02/2007 4:56:56 AM PST by Dick Vomer (liberals suck....... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Daffynition
“scholarly data show” that 65,000...

Respectfully, scholarly data advanced by whom?

It says right here that "don't ask, don't tell" has been the de facto policy since at least the French and Indian War. I suspect that homosexuals were enlisting or being commissioned when Joshua fought the Battle of Jericho. The thing of it is is I don't see data from these "scholars" regarding the improvement of the military that will ensue when we put a question on the application requesting a designation.

12 posted on 12/02/2007 4:59:16 AM PST by stevem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
I see a lot of "NGs" here.

Are we talking about more phony ranks?

They are probably as phony as the figure for the number of "gays" currently serving, and my guess is that most of them are weekend warriors as well.

Why do I get this feeling that the National Guard has certain geographical areas where the commander is a gay recruiter and follows Jesuit homosexual indoctrination and "training" practices?

:-(
13 posted on 12/02/2007 4:59:17 AM PST by cgbg (Nada non nyet--nanny amnesty Huckabee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse
How does that matter and why?

cause they've never served in a FAO that make you have to trust someone with your life. Where little lover's spats could get a unit killed. It just adds another layer of complexity to a combat situation. Do you press charges for calling someone a "f#g" as sexual harassment? So now you add PC speech to ROE in a combat zone.

14 posted on 12/02/2007 5:01:32 AM PST by Dick Vomer (liberals suck....... but it depends on what your definition of the word "suck" is.,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
Homos often end up missing morning muster.

And how would you know that?

15 posted on 12/02/2007 5:04:23 AM PST by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rocksblues

btt


16 posted on 12/02/2007 5:04:35 AM PST by rocksblues (Just enforce the law!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rbg81
About 1/3 of these appear to be medical officers—not combat rated.
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

Medical officers are more knowledgeable of the medical consequences not only for the gays but for the heterosexual soldier as well.

Gays live a life that puts them in very close physical contact with a very large number of other gays who are often sick with highly communicable diseases that non-gay soldiers can a DO get: tuberculosis, body lice, staff and strep skin infections, flu, pneumonia, meningitis, are merely a few of likely several hundred examples.

To make matters worse, once a gay becomes HIV positive ( which might not be known for quite a long time) his immune system gradually deteriorates. This makes him even more likely to contract one of the above diseases and then carry it back to infect the heterosexual soldiers in his unit.

Remember: HIV people living a highly active homosexual live style are walking petri dishes of diseases that the rest of us can and DO get!

17 posted on 12/02/2007 5:05:24 AM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: btcusn; cgbg
Senior officers are highly skilled executive leaders. They are also to a large extent politicians.

I would place far more value on a survey conducted at the deckplate level, E-4 and below.

18 posted on 12/02/2007 5:05:47 AM PST by Jacquerie (Navy 38 Army 3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine

It certainly is linked to the political season in some way and I think would reflect some change Hillary would make if she is elected.

This is probably the “gay movement” and or Hillary response to the their flunkie (”General” Whatshisname) being outed as a plant in the CNN “debate.”


19 posted on 12/02/2007 5:07:22 AM PST by Nextrush (Proudly uncommitted in the 2008 race for president for now,, but McCain and Paul never)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Racehorse; rbg81

How does that matter and why?

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

It matters a **lot**!

Please read post #17.


20 posted on 12/02/2007 5:08:02 AM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson