Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney's "Faith of his Fathers" - His Church leaders speak out about Jesus Christ.
lds.org ^ | January, 2000 | LDS Church

Posted on 12/08/2007 11:30:00 AM PST by sevenbak

After Thursdays speech by Romney on 'Faith in America', I thought I would share what he did not, nor should he have. This is what he believes about Jesus Christ. It's the statement by the leaders proclaimed to the world at the turn of the millennium, in January 2000.

==========================================================================

The Living Christ: The testimony of the Apostles of the LDS Church.

As we commemorate the birth of Jesus Christ two millennia ago, we offer our testimony of the reality of His matchless life and the infinite virtue of His great atoning sacrifice. None other has had so profound an influence upon all who have lived and will yet live upon the earth.

He was the Great Jehovah of the Old Testament, the Messiah of the New. Under the direction of His Father, He was the creator of the earth. “All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made” (John 1:3). Though sinless, He was baptized to fulfill all righteousness. He “went about doing good” (Acts 10:38), yet was despised for it. His gospel was a message of peace and goodwill. He entreated all to follow His example. He walked the roads of Palestine, healing the sick, causing the blind to see, and raising the dead. He taught the truths of eternity, the reality of our premortal existence, the purpose of our life on earth, and the potential for the sons and daughters of God in the life to come.

He instituted the sacrament as a reminder of His great atoning sacrifice. He was arrested and condemned on spurious charges, convicted to satisfy a mob, and sentenced to die on Calvary’s cross. He gave His life to atone for the sins of all mankind. His was a great vicarious gift in behalf of all who would ever live upon the earth.

We solemnly testify that His life, which is central to all human history, neither began in Bethlehem nor concluded on Calvary. He was the Firstborn of the Father, the Only Begotten Son in the flesh, the Redeemer of the world.

He rose from the grave to “become the firstfruits of them that slept” (1 Corinthians 15:20). As Risen Lord, He visited among those He had loved in life. He also ministered among His “other sheep” (John 10:16) in ancient America. In the modern world, He and His Father appeared to the boy Joseph Smith, ushering in the long-promised “dispensation of the fulness of times” (Ephesians 1:10).

Of the Living Christ, the Prophet Joseph wrote: “His eyes were as a flame of fire; the hair of his head was white like the pure snow; his countenance shone above the brightness of the sun; and his voice was as the sound of the rushing of great waters, even the voice of Jehovah, saying:

“I am the first and the last; I am he who liveth, I am he who was slain; I am your advocate with the Father” (D&C 110:3–4).

Of Him the Prophet also declared: “And now, after the many testimonies which have been given of him, this is the testimony, last of all, which we give of him: That he lives!

“For we saw him, even on the right hand of God; and we heard the voice bearing record that he is the Only Begotten of the Father—

“That by him, and through him, and of him, the worlds are and were created, and the inhabitants thereof are begotten sons and daughters unto God” (D&C 76:22–24).

We declare in words of solemnity that His priesthood and His Church have been restored upon the earth—“built upon the foundation of … apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ himself being the chief corner stone” (Ephesians 2:20).

We testify that He will someday return to earth. “And the glory of the Lord shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together” (Isaiah 40:5). He will rule as King of Kings and reign as Lord of Lords, and every knee shall bend and every tongue shall speak in worship before Him. Each of us will stand to be judged of Him according to our works and the desires of our hearts.

We bear testimony, as His duly ordained Apostles—that Jesus is the Living Christ, the immortal Son of God. He is the great King Immanuel, who stands today on the right hand of His Father. He is the light, the life, and the hope of the world. His way is the path that leads to happiness in this life and eternal life in the world to come. God be thanked for the matchless gift of His divine Son.



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: christmas; currentevents; jesus; lds; ldschurch; mitt; mormon; religion; romney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 next last
To: Doctor Don
Revelation 22:18 “ I testify to everyone who hears the words of the prophecy of this book: if anyone adds to them, God shall add to him the plagues which are written in this book.”

Love it when people post this verse. It points directly to their ignorance of the how the Bible was written, compiled, and when the books of the New Testament were written.

The Book of Revelations was written before many of the other books in the New Testament. So those other books were added after Revelations was written. Revelations was also a stand-alone document until compiled into the Bible along with most of what we know of the Bible today.

So by adding those other books that appear in the New Testament does that mean that "God shall add to him the plagues which are written in this book." Not good for Bible publishers.

Quoting that verse is actually a pretty rookie mistake people make when trying to refute the LDS Church.

141 posted on 12/09/2007 1:28:44 PM PST by Domandred (Eagles soar, but unfortunately weasels never get sucked into jet engines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet

“Christians consider this blasphemous.”

And why is that? Was Abel’s righteousness somehow tainted because his brother Cain choose evil? What does the actions or status of one person have to do with the standing of their siblings? Lucifer was called a ‘son of the morning’, so then who was his father? Where did he come from?

From http://en.fairmormon.org/Jesus_Christ_is_the_brother_of_Satan


The early pre-nicene Church father Lactantius wrote:

Since God was possessed of the greatest foresight for planning, and of the greatest skill for carrying out in action, before He commenced this business of the world,—inasmuch as there was in Him, and always is, the fountain of full and most complete goodness,—in order that goodness might spring as a stream from Him, and might flow forth afar, He produced a Spirit like to Himself, who might be endowed with the perfections of God the Father... Then He made another being, in whom the disposition of the divine origin did not remain. Therefore he was infected with his own envy as with poison, and passed from good to evil; and at his own will, which had been given to him by God unfettered, he acquired for himself a contrary name. From which it appears that the source of all evils is envy. For he envied his predecessor, who through his steadfastness is acceptable and dear to God the Father. This being, who from good became evil by his own act, is called by the Greeks diabolus: we call him accuser, because he reports to God the faults to which he himself entices us. God, therefore, when He began the fabric of the world, set over the whole work that first and greatest Son, and used Him at the same time as a counselor and artificer, in planning, arranging, and accomplishing, since He is complete both in knowledge, and judgment, and power... [Lactantius, Divine Institutes 2.9. in Alexander Roberts and James Donaldson, eds. The Ante-Nicene Fathers, 10 vols. (1885; reprint, Peabody: Hendrickson, 2004), 1:52–53.]

Many things he here taught are not considered “orthodox” by today’s standards. However, Lactantius was definitely orthodox during his lifetime. Amazingly, many things here correspond to LDS doctrine precisely in those areas that are “unorthodox.”


“As clearly explained with annotations here (beginning at the bottom of p. 179), and here (beginning in the section titled LITERAL SON OF GOD), Mormon theology teaches that God is a man and that Christ was conceived through a sexual act between Mary and God the Father. In other words, the birth of Christ is considered a natural, rather than a miraculous occurrence.”

Oh here we go again, somebody who thinks they know the theology of my church better than I do after living it and studying it for over 30 years.

The Pratt writings were disavowed by the church very soon after he published them, and Pratt was censured for it and realizing he was in error also disavowed his work. They don’t tell you that in those web pages because that ruins the story they want to sell you and leaving that out is very dishonest IMHO.

Our doctrine is that Mary, a virgin, conceived by a miracle brought about by the power of the Holy Ghost. Everything that happened after that took place as naturally as any other pregnancy. She literal carried a child, she literally delivered him as with any other birthing, and that child was literally the son of our Heavenly Father. Mary was a virgin throughout the pregnancy. Did the Holy Ghost play a role? Yes, so in that sense you can say the Holy Ghost bears some responsibility in her being pregnant, but not in terms of being the father of her child. The Bible often cites God the Father, not the Holy Ghost, and being Christ’s father.

All the other quotes fit perfectly with the doctrine I have described above and those same sources also assert that Christ was born of a virgin, but again they leave that out. The literalness of Christ’s sonship is a RESULT of the miracle that his conception was. Reverse engineering it to claim there was a sexual relationship is reading into their words things contrary to what they actually said.

“Joseph Fielding Smith, Jr., said: “The birth of the Savior was a natural occurrence unattended with any degree of mysticism, “

I trust you understand the difference between BIRTH and CONCEPTION. His conception was a miracle, after than things proceeded naturally, morning sickness, stretch marks, cravings, contractions, moving down the birth canal, cutting the cord and entering the world just like you and I did. It was not a metaphor, it was not some event that didn’t really take place in the real world and that is what he is saying. As I said before, that same source also asserts the virgin birth, but the people writing the website leave that part out because it ruins their story. Stop falling for the lies.

“there are many important LDS doctrines which are not found in the Book of Mormon.”

So what? The BoM contains the fullness of the gospel, but the gospel is only a part of the plan of salvation. Nobody ever claimed the BoM to contain the fullness of LDS theology.

“Moreover, as explained with annotations HERE, there are many key doctrines found in Doctrine and Covenants and The Pearl of Great Price which clearly contradict Book of Mormon scripture.”

Because you do not have a full or accurate understanding of our theology you perceive a contradiction where there is none. For example, those verses in Alma that say God is a Spirit were said BEFORE the birth of Christ, and at that time in our theology, Christ was in fact a spirit. The verse saying that Christ has a physical body was given after Christ’s resurection, hence both are true in their historical context. Likewise the other supposed contradictions only display the ignorance of the writers.

“It has been my experience in talking with Mormons over the years that many LDS members are not aware of all their church’s teachings.”

What you are talking about isn’t our teachings in a lot of cases, they are cleverly designed lies crafted to fool people. Most members don’t bother wading through all the lies spread about us, they focus on studying what our theology REALLY is and I’ve not seen any other Christian church do more to educate it’s members on their beliefs than ours does.

“With this in mind, I encourage you to study and above websites and let me know if you find any of their statements in error.”

I’ve done so in a brief fashion. I hope your reaction will demonstrate your commitment to truth, intellectual honesty and fairness. If it does than I’ll be happy to discuss things further with you.


142 posted on 12/09/2007 2:09:56 PM PST by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

I suggest you look into the difference between BIRTH and CONCEPTION. Not one quote there talks about how Mary concieved, they only talk about the RESULT of her miraculous conception, and you can find those same leaders also asserting the miracle of the virgin birth in those very same works those quotes are pulled from.


143 posted on 12/09/2007 2:13:41 PM PST by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

“That Joe Smith is a “true prophet” is an LDS belief.”

And although we disagree over whether it is a true belief or not, the general principle I stated (If you reject a true prophet you also reject Christ) still holds.

Would you agree that if somebody rejects Noah or Abraham or Moses, or Peter as false prophets and think they accept Christ that they are fooling themselves?


144 posted on 12/09/2007 2:18:54 PM PST by Grig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Those quotes have been spouted over and over by the anti talking points. Read them carefully and see the trap you have been taken for. It says the BIRTH was a natural as normal births, not the conception. The other one says Begotten, not conceived. Here, let me me make this really plain for you, since I know you won’t crack a Book of Mormon. Here’s what our official doctrine is on the virgin birth.

Alma 7:10
And behold, he shall be born of Mary, at Jerusalem which is the land of our forefathers, she being a virgin, a precious and chosen vessel, who shall be overshadowed and conceive by the power of the Holy Ghost, and bring forth a son, yea, even the Son of God.

2 Nephi 17:14
Therefore, the Lord himself shall give you a sign—Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and shall bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.

1 Nephi 11:20
And I looked and beheld the virgin again, bearing a child in her arms.

1 Nephi 11:18
And he said unto me: Behold, the virgin whom thou seest is the mother of the Son of God, after the manner of the flesh.

145 posted on 12/09/2007 3:49:01 PM PST by sevenbak (Wise men still seek Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: fish hawk
...go straight to the Lord and the original Bible not the altered one the Mormons made up.

Great idea. Let’s go straight to the bible, and again straight to the Lord.

Use the King James bible, like we do, unaltered, unchanged, (I don't know where you get your assertion).

http://scriptures.lds.org/en/nt/contents

While you are there, let’s (like you suggest) take the council to go straight to the Lord. In fact, this scripture was what let Joseph Smith to pray to God to seek answers for himself, from God himself, not all the different interpretations had by the many churches of the day.

Pay close attention to verse 7. If you waver in your faith that you will receive an answer, the Lord will not give you one. Plain and simple

James 1:5-7

5 if any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God, that giveth to all men liberally, and upbraideth not; and it shall be given him.
6 But let him ask in faith, nothing wavering. For he that wavereth is like a wave of the sea driven with the wind and tossed.
7 For let not that man think that he shall receive any thing of the Lord.

146 posted on 12/09/2007 3:59:42 PM PST by sevenbak (Wise men still seek Him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39; hoppity
I Said" I would also suggest you ask people to identify their position, Mormon or not Mormon, I am a Mormon.

You Said" DU, as you know I am former Mormon...I DO think your suggestion is not really appropriate. Some people would consider it a breach of the anonymity of this site. And hoppity might get some replies he/she may not like to that question.

LOL! So saying you are a Mormon, or not identifies you?

As to the answers being upsetting, well that would tell Hoppity how to deal with their other answers. Thanks for the advice, but my advice stands, feel free to give your own. I will point out to Hoppity that you have identified yourself as an ex-Mormon, and now you are asking not to have to identify yourself, how is Hoppity to know? You could speak of when you were baptized and then state a doctrine in which we do not believe as your belief. you may be able to tell, but for a beginner on these threads, a team roster can be very useful.

I, personally, make it a point to not try and label the FReepers I debate with, even though most of the time I can tell if they are Mormon.

I commend you for your piety in not judging, however, you have a depth of knowledge taut Hoppity does not.

As our mod friend keeps saying, "Don't make it personal."

I have not advocated "Making it personal" I have advocated knowing the perspective of posters before evaluating their posts.
147 posted on 12/09/2007 5:13:12 PM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

Sorry to have offended you Delph...I have seen FReepers become upset at questions like that. IIRC, you had at one time invited me to offer advice to you. I won’t do it again.


148 posted on 12/09/2007 5:17:06 PM PST by greyfoxx39 (Romney, fooled TWICE by a Columbian gardener...what kind of discernment for POTUS is this?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: Domandred
Polygamy is still practiced by many Mormons.

FALSE.

Believe whatever you wish!

It was because of Mormons and your founder, a false prophet, that polygamy was banned by the United States Supreme Court. Polygamy is not Christian and at that time, Christians didn’t want the Mormon polygamy to continue. You may want to tell fellow Mormon that polygamy is against the law.

149 posted on 12/09/2007 5:20:00 PM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: sevenbak

‘Pay close attention’: “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.” Gal 1:8


150 posted on 12/09/2007 5:32:55 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: ColdSteelTalon
Are you telling me that the Mormons teachings are the same as whats in the Bible? Is that what you saying? Or are you just being absurd?

Actually that is exactly what we are saying, we have a different perspective on the Bible than the "traditional one" that does not mean our perspective is not the correct one. Mormons understand things about the Bible no other Christian sect understands, and for that we are demonized by the very people who do not understand our perspective.

Personally, I have little patience for those who would tell me what I believe without taking the time to learn from us what in fact we actually believe. If you want to tell me what you believe, listen for a bit, or just go away. To those who think me brisk in some of my responses, this is the reason.
151 posted on 12/09/2007 5:33:05 PM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: nmh
As someone who is not LDS but who has lived in Utah for around 30 years....NO member of the LDS Church practices Pologamy.

However there are a few 'break-off' Churches where Pologamy IS practiced...i.e. see the trial of Rulon Jeffs down in St. George.

Also (as a confirmed Christian for just about my entire life) the LDS ARE Christians.

They view Christ as the Head of their Church.

The ones that I know (and living in Utah means I know a lot of them) have always attempted to follow the example's of Christ in their daily lives...something that I wish many on FR would do...especially on these threads.

You may disagree with the Book of Mormon (I do) but they are Christians.

Remember what the Master of us all said...."Let him among you who is without sin cast the first stone."

They are good people with excellent family values.

Let it go.

redrock

152 posted on 12/09/2007 5:45:17 PM PST by redrock ("Better a shack in Heaven...than a Mansion in Hell"----My Grandmother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: liege
"No, he isn't supposed to appear to Christians."

Why not??????

redrock

153 posted on 12/09/2007 5:46:16 PM PST by redrock ("Better a shack in Heaven...than a Mansion in Hell"----My Grandmother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: redrock
Believe whatever you wish!

They don’t believe in the Trinity.

They believe you can achieve “godhood like Christ” did.

They are a works driven faith that believe those who lead excemplatory lives will get a “planet” and “virgins”.

Not at all Christian.

Never mind about their other books that take priority over the Bible - ah, because the Bible was “corrupted”. So young hormone driven Smith comes along and dreams up polygamy as okay as well as other false teachings. His flawed teachings continue ... and what makes LDS or Mormonism unChristian.

154 posted on 12/09/2007 6:02:02 PM PST by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Zakeet
I try to post only accurate information about your church. While it is true the Tanners are Christians (and ex-LDS), I have found everything I used from their web site to be abundantly annotated with quotations from both Mormon Scripture and Mormon Prophets.

I appreciate your attempt to present an accurate picture, please understand you will be as accurate as I would be should I attempt to explain your religion (whatever it is) without actually believing it. Please understand you cannot accurately teach that which you your self do not believe.

I regret that I cannot spend the time tonight to refute the entire web site, but here is a refutation that has already been done of the tanners.
A RESPONSE TO MORMONISM--SHADOW OR REALITY? Personally, I don't think that is wise in light of the following:

I understand why you would tell people to be wary of Asking God about our church, Since millions of Momrons have all received a direct response from God through the holy ghost.

I recommend that any who wonder read the section of my web page here titled Put our religion to "The Test"

Your logical, earthly reasoning is just that, ask God what is his, and he will answer.

I think I know the reason. If I pray rather than seeking evidence, how can I be sure that it isn't the devil answering me?

Science is the history of proving that we were wrong, evidence can and often is subject to interpolation, direct revelation from God is not.

I remember reading somewhere that in Mormon temple ceremony, Adam prays to his heavenly father and three times he says, Oh God, hear the words of my mouth. It is also my understanding (and as a temple Mormon you can confirm this) that it is none other than Lucifer who answers his prayer. Doesn't your own temple ceremony make it clear the devil is capable of answering prayer?

Actually, you have things a bit mixed up, but that is common, I will not correct you, but I will state that Satan does not answer Adams prayer, he visits Adam while he is praying, Satan cannot even hear a prayer to go, CS Lewis taught me that one and it is true.

I think this is why the Mormon Church invites prospective members such as myself to undertake a critical examination. Specifically:

Interesting straw man argument, claim we teach something we do not, then claim that as motivation for teaching men to ask God. Only God or messengers he sends can answer prayers to God, That is fundamental Mormon teaching. Please provide a scripture that teaches that Satan can answer a prayer to God.

<Snip>

I think the ability of Satan to answer prayer is one reason Christians are taught not to rely on prayer and feelings as a replacement for valid evidence.

I would like for someone, anyone to show me one scripture that says that when a prayer is said to God, Satan can answer instead of God.

There is no such scripture, we are instead commanded in the Bible to Ask him, to Try the spirits, The Bible says that if you Ask of God and it shall be Given.

Show me where if you ask God Satan answers instead. Not just Satan visiting someone, for even Jesus was tempted, but answering instead of God. I submit to you that if you believe that Satan will answer a prayer to God and God will not, then you believe Satan is God, for that is who you believe will answer your prayers to God. I believe that only God answers prayers to God.

This is not to suggest that we should not be in prayer during a testing process.

Why? If you do not believe God will answer your prayer, why pray?

But prayer should not be the test.

If God says it should be the test, will you try it?
First John 4:1-3
1 Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.
2 Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:
3 And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.
I testify to you and all who will read this that by the very spirit that testified to me of the truthfulness of the Book of Mormon was I also taught that Jesus is the Christ my Lord, may Savior that he did live that he did die on the cross at Calvary, and he did it for me, and I need that sacrifice, daily, and for that, I am ashamed and will always be ashamed to have added to his pain.

Instead, we are told to pray for guidance as to what to look for and where to look concerning what is being said.

IMHO, You do not understand the Bible.
155 posted on 12/09/2007 6:21:01 PM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39
Sorry to have offended you Delph...I have seen FReepers become upset at questions like that. IIRC, you had at one time invited me to offer advice to you. I won’t do it again.

I was not offended, and I apologize if my zeal in responding was taken as offense. I do appreciate your suggestions and do not wish to offend you, please, feel free to offer advice, however, I hope I am free to reject it if I see fit.

Agreed?
156 posted on 12/09/2007 6:30:21 PM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: redrock
"No, he isn't supposed to appear to Christians."

Why not??????

Well, you got me.

To my recollection the only appearances of Jesus that I am aware of seem to be surrounded by "kooky" circumstances. Oral Roberts seeing a 900 foot tall Jesus at ORU comes immediately to mind. I guess scripturally it is possible; it's not forbidden. I just don't want to be fooled by a demon posing as an "angel of light".

Too many are fooled these days because they don't know the truth of the Bible as written thousands of years ago, inspired by the Holy Spirit. They really don't like the fact that God is telling them to change the way they live so they start their own religion. It's the original sin, do it your way not God's. Jehovah's Witnesses don't like the concept of Hell so they write it out of scripture.

I get the feeling that if Jesus were to appear to me I would probably become as a dead man, like the Apostle John. Jesus is the Alpha and the Omega, the first and the last, Almighty God, the great I AM so I don't think He is going to appear to me to tell me write scripture to correct the apostate version of the Holy Bible. But I guess He could, if He chose to.

Exo 33:20

But He said, "You cannot see my face, for no man can see Me and live!"

157 posted on 12/09/2007 6:43:11 PM PST by bubbacluck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: nmh; redrock
Hey redrock, long time no see.

Believe whatever you wish!

Thank you, we only ask one more thing, let us tell others what we believe since you simply don't know, thank you.

They don’t believe in the Trinity.

That is correct, we do not believe the unBiblical concept of the Trinity added by the emperor Constantine to make Christianity more palatable tot he newly re-united Roman Empire and as a reward for the church bowing to his will he made the Catholic Church, the Roman Catholic church the state religion of Rome. This is not some fantasy of mine, the Catholic Church admits it in their web site, at this link: Newadvent.org
I have explained this and have other scriptures that go with this at this link: http://www.freerepublic.com/~delphiuser/#TheTrinity

They believe you can achieve “godhood like Christ” did.

No, we believe we can achieve God hood through the Son for we will inherit all that he hath.

They are a works driven faith that believe those who lead excemplatory lives will get a “planet” and “virgins”.

There is no "Planet" and no "Virgins" given as a reward in Mormon doctrine.

We believe in being doers of the word, not hearers only: James 1:22-25
22 But be ye doers of the word, and not hearers only, deceiving your own selves.
23 For if any be a hearer of the word, and not a doer, he is like unto a man beholding his natural face in a glass:
24 For he beholdeth himself, and goeth his way, and straightway forgetteth what manner of man he was.
25 But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed.
It takes faith, and works, not faith only, not works only.

Not at all Christian.

There is only one who can determine if we are or are not Christian, and you are not him.

Never mind about their other books that take priority over the Bible -

They don't, the Book of Mormon says "ANOTHER TESTAMENT OF JESUS CHRIST " it's on the title page. Another, the Bible was and is first.

ah, because the Bible was “corrupted”.

Well, it was, that is provable, but you don't want to hear, so it is written let him who hath ears to hear let him hear.

So young hormone driven Smith comes along and dreams up polygamy as okay as well as other false teachings.

The Pharisees said almost the same thing of Jesus.

His flawed teachings continue ... and what makes LDS or Mormonism unChristian.

A prophet is hard to follow, he often calls upon the proud to repent, they don't like that.

There is a prophet, and he teaches what God tells him to, and he writes new scriptures when commanded to. Revelations speaks of Prophets in the future tense, that time is now. Godspeed, may he enlighten your soul.
158 posted on 12/09/2007 8:32:14 PM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: DelphiUser

Gotta Go, BBL8R


159 posted on 12/09/2007 8:33:43 PM PST by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: sevenbak
This part just speaks to my heart each time I read it.
Of Him the Prophet also declared: “And now, after the many testimonies which have been given of him, this is the testimony, last of all, which we give of him: That he lives!

“For we saw him, even on the right hand of God; and we heard the voice bearing record that he is the Only Begotten of the Father—

“That by him, and through him, and of him, the worlds are and were created, and the inhabitants thereof are begotten sons and daughters unto God” (D&C 76:22–24).


160 posted on 12/09/2007 8:50:48 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson