Posted on 12/20/2007 8:59:16 AM PST by Travis McGee
I think the point is that if he’s lying about this ad, his Christianity is not the main feature of his character. I haven’t seen the ad myself, so I don’t know. Having made several movies myself, I can say that sometimes, subtleties are intended - sometimes, people read unwarranted significance into things.
Beliefs are what guide you, not what makes you think you are better than others.
Or do you hold certain candidates, an ex-preacher for example, to a higher standard?
Oops. I posted before I finished. I meant to add that the problem is that he’s denying it. He should have just said either “yes, we wanted to have a cross in our Christmas message” or “no, we didn’t notice it until the ad ran, but there it is and I like it.”
He broke the law:
UN-15a.Article.43
No citizen shall display the cross of Christ.
Do you see what I see?
that is not the issue.
Like all things it is the LIE not the facts.
1. Huckabee is pushing the “more christain than you” campaign. (did you know he was a preacher on 9/11)
2. Huckabee did not simply put a cross in the background, he use an allusion to a cross.
3. He then DENIED that it was deliberate when in fact it is OBVIOUS it is a deliberate action in the lighting, the movement, and the fact image control people micromanage these items for all campaigns.
It is a sleazy act by a sleazy politician.
A joke. Got it.
It looked like a bookcase to me. Who cares?
Maybe they’re denying it because they thought it was a bookcase too? The camera only panned past the bookcase because they wanted to bring the tree into the frame slowly... OK. Big deal?
I don’t even like Huck all that much... but sheesh. Much ado about nothing.
I don’t think that proves anything beyond taking the long way around to point out the obvious - that the camera is moving. But we already knew that. This kind of thing is done all the time, and is very popular in contemporary production. It is an aesthetic choice, and yes, a deliberate one. Making issue out of it totally misses the mark though. Why cares if the “cross” is floating or stationary, anyways?
The point of it is that the bookshelf was chosen, framed, and lighted in a particular way to resemble a cross, “floating” or not. The camera movement was designed simply to bring more attention to it, just to make sure them dumb rubes in Iowa didn’t miss it.
My problem is having people like Meridith Viera in positions of influence.
I saw the ad, it looks likes shelves.
Confused about what VIEIRA? That Christ was born on Christmas morn? So what?
Travis,
Perhaps Huckabee didn't know about it during the film production, and after being presented with the posited truth, didn't wish to acknowledge it. To you as well, so what?
There are a lot of bigger reasons than this not to support him. Let this one go.
Thanks for reminding me to link the video. Looking at a still photo capture doesn't reveal the perfect manipulation of the cross effect by the use of the moving camera tracking dolly.
he did not simply hang a cross or even have a manger scene.
He used subterfuge to create a cross with tricks of angle and light.
Huckabee is doing the more christian than thou and his anti mormon spin stuff.
This was no mere christmas “howdy”.
My more fundamental problem with Huck is he didn't seem to govern as a conservative in Arkansas.
So, we've got fiscal and foreign policy conservatives who are social liberals, a social conservative who is a fiscal liberal and a guy who claims to have been converted to social conservatism. Somewhere in that mess I need to find a candidate. :-))
I don't care about his use of the cross in a political ad.
I worry greatly about his LYING about using the cross.
If a former preacher will lie about the cross, what won't he lie about?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.