Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ARG Iowa: Huck 23%; Romney 21%; McCain 17%
American Research Group ^ | December 24, 2007

Posted on 12/24/2007 2:48:03 PM PST by Plutarch

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last
To: Dane

Fred was low in the ARG poll the last time out. The Real Clear Politics composite poll had Fred about 1 percent behind McQueeg in 4th. Let’s wait for some other polls to come out.


41 posted on 12/24/2007 5:14:10 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Thompson at 3% isn’t even on the field.


42 posted on 12/24/2007 5:21:28 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SubMareener

“So, could you enumerate the policy areas and positions that Mr. Hinckley will influence President Romney to take? Maybe this influence would not be a bad thing.”

If you are really curious, them I suggest you study mormon teachings going all the way back to Joseph Smith.

Bottom line is that I don’t think the average American would like american policy to be influenced by a mormon “prophet and seer.” I know a great many don’t want a former Baptist preacher (AKA Mike Huckabee) to lead because they know his Baptist beliefs define him. I’m certain that even more would oppose a mormon if they were familiar with all the “different” theology and practices of mormons. Of course, the mormons on this forum want him for those very reasons - he is one of them. Of course - the same can be said for evangelicals like myself wanting Huckabee - he is one of us. I’m trying to be fair here.

I would encourage persons that are interested to study the differences between the two. Especially examine the unabridged life of Joseph Smith the founder of mormonism. He was, to say the least, a remarkable character. In many ways he was the David Koresh of the 19th Century.


43 posted on 12/24/2007 5:25:17 PM PST by Sola Veritas (Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas

That is just so much BS. On top of that you still did not answer the question.


44 posted on 12/24/2007 5:47:36 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Polls in Iowa are fine for discussion, but as the 2004 Democratic caucus proved, Iowa caucus polls are never very accurate, especially ten days out. There will be other polls later this week showing completely different numbers.


45 posted on 12/24/2007 6:03:06 PM PST by mcjordansc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
OK, so now we understand that all you have are ad homen attacks, based on your concept of “us” vs. “them”. Not much veritas to be found in your position.
46 posted on 12/24/2007 6:06:03 PM PST by SubMareener (Become a monthly donor! Free FreeRepublic.com from Quarterly FReepathons!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug

Iowa? Definitely.

Nationally? I’m not so sure...


47 posted on 12/24/2007 6:13:01 PM PST by jmyrlefuller ("I am pretty much a compassionless jerk.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
Prophet, Seer & Revelator President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints His disclaimers notwithstanding. If Romney is elected, this is the person that will actually control Romney.

You're a pathetic bigot and an embarrasment to the Free Republic.

Romney is running for the Presidency of the United States, not Pope, not Grand Pooba of the Southern Baptist Convention. I'm not a Romney supporter but your slime tactics as well as other flat earthers on the fundi right are revealing your true un-Christian nature.

48 posted on 12/24/2007 6:16:36 PM PST by Maynerd (Hillary = amnesty, higher taxes,defeat in the WOT, and socialized medicine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Sola Veritas
As soon as I saw that, I knew that picture reminded me of someone.

Anyone here remember the infamous Herbert W. Armstrong? Take a look at the three pictures of HWA on top and tell me these two guys weren't separated at birth.

EVEN CREEPIER....look at the little tag line next to the picture on the left.

Sound familiar?

Hank

Photobucket Photobucket Photobucket

Photobucket

49 posted on 12/24/2007 6:42:05 PM PST by County Agent Hank Kimball (Well, really just plain Hank Kimball. Well, not "just plain" Hank Kimball, just Hank Kimball....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Fred is Dead is official.


50 posted on 12/24/2007 6:49:37 PM PST by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (Christ's Kingdom on Earth is the answer. What is your question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TitansAFC; meandog; therut; Laissez-faire capitalist; MARTIAL MONK; napscoordinator; sportutegrl; ..
The McCain List.

McCain holds steady in Iowa (17%, movement within MoE), strengthens core support (up to 83%).
51 posted on 12/24/2007 6:50:11 PM PST by Norman Bates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: County Agent Hank Kimball
Any suggestion that as president Mitt Romney would take direction from the First Presidency of the LDS Church is as silly and misplaced as the idea that they would even offer any such direction. If they were of a mind to intrude into the political process, they would have taken action against Harry Reid long ago.

If you choose to despise Mormons, that is your sad business. But God will hold you accountable according to the judgment that you render.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

These, Our Little Ones


President Gordon B. Hinckley

Once when our grandchildren were small, my wife and I took some of them to the circus. I recall that I was more interested in watching them and many others of their kind than in watching the man on the flying trapeze. I looked at them in wonder as they alternately laughed and stared wide-eyed at the exciting things before them. And I thought of the miracle of children who become the world’s constant renewal of life and purpose. Observing them in the intensity of their interest, even in this atmosphere, I felt my mind revert to that beautiful and touching scene recorded in the book of 3 Nephi when the resurrected Lord took little children in His arms and wept as He blessed them and said to the people, “Behold your little ones” (3 Nephi 17:23).

It is so obvious that the great good and the terrible evil in the world today are the sweet and the bitter fruits of the rearing of yesterday’s children. As we train a new generation, so will the world be in a few years. If you are worried about the future, then look to the upbringing of your children. Wisely did the writer of Proverbs declare, “Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it” (Proverbs 22:6).

When I was a boy, we lived on a fruit farm in the summer. We grew great quantities of peaches. Our father took us to tree pruning demonstrations put on by the agricultural college. Each Saturday during January and February, we would go out to the farm and prune the trees. We learned that by clipping and sawing in the right places, even when snow was on the ground and the wood appeared dead, we could shape a tree so that the sun would touch the fruit which was to come with spring and summer. We learned that in February we could pretty well determine the kind of fruit we would pick in September.

E. T. Sullivan once wrote these interesting words: “When God wants a great work done in the world or a great wrong righted, he goes about it in a very unusual way. He doesn’t stir up his earthquakes or send forth his thunderbolts. Instead, he has a helpless baby born, perhaps in a simple home and of some obscure mother. And then God puts the idea into the mother’s heart, and she puts it into the baby’s mind. And then God waits. The greatest forces in the world are not the earthquakes and the thunderbolts. The greatest forces in the world are babies.”

And those babies, I should like to add, will become forces for good or ill, depending in large measure on how they are reared. The Lord, without equivocation, has declared, “I have commanded you to bring up your children in light and truth” (D&C 93:40).

Four Imperatives

If I may be pardoned for suggesting the obvious, I do so only because the obvious is not observed in so many instances. The obvious includes four imperatives with reference to children: (1) love them, (2) teach them, (3) respect them, and (4) pray with them and for them.

There once was a commonly seen bumper sticker that asked the question, “Have you hugged your child today?” How fortunate, how blessed is the child who feels the affection of his or her parents. That warmth, that love will bear sweet fruit in the years that follow. In large measure, the harshness that characterizes so much of our society is an outgrowth of harshness imposed on children years ago.

The neighborhood in which I grew up was a microcosm of the world, with many varieties of people. They were a close-knit group, and I think we knew them all. I think also we loved them all—that is, except for one man. I must make a confession: I detested that man. I have since repented of that emotion, but as I look back, I can sense again the intensity of my feeling. Why this strong antipathy? Because he whipped his children with strap or stick or whatever came to hand as his vicious anger flared on the slightest provocation.

Perhaps it was because of the home in which I lived, where there was a father who, by some quiet magic, was able to discipline his children without the use of any instrument of punishment, though on occasion they may have deserved it.

I have since discovered that the man I disliked was one of that very substantial body of parents who seem incapable of anything but harshness toward those for whose coming into the world they are responsible. I have also come to realize that this man, who walks in the memories of my childhood, is but an example of uncounted thousands across the world who are known as child abusers. Every social worker, every duty officer in the emergency room of a large hospital, every police officer and judge in a large city can tell you of them. The whole tragic picture is one of beating, kicking, slamming, and even of sexual assault on small children. And akin to these violent child abusers are those vicious men and women who exploit children for pornographic purposes.

I have no disposition to dwell on this ugly picture. I wish to say only that no one who is a professed follower of Christ and no one who is a professed member of this Church can engage in such practices without offending God and repudiating the teachings of His Son. It was Jesus Himself who, while holding before us the example of the purity and innocence of children, declared, “Whoso shall offend one of these little ones … , it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea” (Matthew 18:6). Could there be a stronger denunciation of those who abuse children than these words spoken by the Savior of mankind?

Begin at Home

Do you want a spirit of love to grow in the world? Then begin within the walls of your own home. Behold your little ones, and see within them the wonders of God, from whose presence they have recently come.

President Brigham Young (1801–77) once said: “A child loves the smiles of its mother, but hates her frowns. I tell the mothers not to allow the children to indulge in evils, but at the same time to treat them with mildness.”

He further stated, “Bring up your children in the love and fear of the Lord; study their dispositions and their temperaments, and deal with them accordingly, never allowing yourself to correct them in the heat of passion; teach them to love you rather than to fear you.”

Of course, there is need for discipline with families. But discipline with severity, discipline with cruelty, inevitably leads not to correction but rather to resentment and bitterness. It cures nothing and only aggravates the problem. It is self-defeating. The Lord, in setting forth the spirit of governance in His Church, has also set forth the spirit of governance in the home in these great words of revelation:

“No power or influence can or ought to be maintained … , only by persuasion, by long-suffering, by gentleness and meekness, and by love unfeigned; …

“Reproving betimes with sharpness, when moved upon by the Holy Ghost; and then showing forth afterwards an increase of love toward him whom thou hast reproved, lest he esteem thee to be his enemy;

“That he may know that thy faithfulness is stronger than the cords of death” (D&C 121:41, 43–44).

The Endurance of Example

Behold your little ones, and teach them. I need not remind you that your example will do more than anything else in impressing upon their minds a pattern of life. It is always interesting to meet the children of old friends and to find in another generation the ways of their fathers and mothers.

The story is told that in ancient Rome a group of women were, with vanity, showing their jewels one to another. Among them was Cornelia, the mother of two boys. One of the women said to her, “And where are your jewels?” To which Cornelia responded, pointing to her sons, “These are my jewels.” Under her tutelage and walking after the virtues of her life, they grew to become Gaius and Tiberius Gracchus—the Gracchi, as they were called—two of the most persuasive and effective reformers in Roman history. For as long as they are remembered and spoken of, the mother who reared them after the manner of her own life will be remembered and spoken of with praise also.

May I return again to the words of Brigham Young: “Let it be your constant care that the children that God has so kindly given you are taught in their early youth the importance of the oracles of God, and the beauty of the principles of our holy religion, that when they grow to the years of man and womanhood they may always cherish a tender regard for them and never forsake the truth.”

I recognize that there are parents who, notwithstanding an outpouring of love and a diligent and faithful effort to teach them, see their children grow in a contrary manner and weep while their wayward sons and daughters willfully pursue courses of tragic consequence. For such I have great sympathy, and to them I am wont to quote the words of Ezekiel: “The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son” (Ezekiel 18:20).

But such is the exception rather than the rule. Nor does the exception justify others of us from making every effort in showing forth love, example, and correct precept in the rearing of those for whom God has given us sacred responsibility.

Nor let us ever forget the need to respect these, our little ones. Under the revealed word of the Lord, we know they are children of God as we are children of God, deserving of that respect which comes of knowledge of that eternal principle. In fact, the Lord made it clear that unless we develop in our own lives that purity, that lack of guile, that innocence of evil, we cannot enter into His presence. Declared He, “Except ye be converted, and become as little children, ye shall not enter into the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 18:3).

Channing Pollock once wrote these interesting and provocative words: “Contemplating the adolescence through which we scorned the wrong, some of us must wish … that we could be born old, and grow younger and cleaner and ever simpler and more innocent, until at last, with the white souls of little children, we lay us down to eternal sleep.”5 Sources of Strength

Behold your little ones. Pray with them. Pray for them and bless them. The world into which they are moving is a complex and difficult world. They will run into heavy seas of adversity. They will need all the strength and all the faith you can give them while they are yet near you. And they will also need a greater strength which comes of a higher power. They must do more than go along with what they find. They must lift the world, and the only levers they will have are the example of their own lives and the powers of persuasion that will come of their testimonies and their knowledge of the things of God. They will need the help of the Lord. While they are young, pray with them that they may come to know that source of strength which shall then always be available in every hour of need.

I love to hear children pray. I appreciate hearing parents pray for their children. I stand reverently before a father who, in the authority of the holy priesthood, lays his hands upon the head of a son or daughter at a time of serious decision and in the name of the Lord and under the direction of the Holy Spirit gives a father’s blessing.

How much more beautiful would be the world and the society in which we live if every father looked upon his children as the most precious of his assets, if he led them by the power of his example in kindness and love, and if in times of stress he blessed them by the authority of the holy priesthood; and if every mother regarded her children as the jewels of her life, as gifts from the God of heaven, who is their Eternal Father, and brought them up with true affection in the wisdom and admonition of the Lord.

Said Isaiah of old, “All thy children shall be taught of the Lord; and great shall be the peace of thy children” (Isaiah 54:13). To which I add, “Great also shall be the peace and the gladness of their fathers and mothers.”

Merry Christmas! And may God bless you and yours this coming year and always.

52 posted on 12/24/2007 6:51:23 PM PST by JCEccles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: JCEccles

WTF?

What does any of this stuff have to do with anything? I understand what YOU wrote. But what does all that drivel from Hinkley about how we ought not discipline our children have to do with the price of tea in China?

Hank


53 posted on 12/24/2007 7:49:54 PM PST by County Agent Hank Kimball (Well, really just plain Hank Kimball. Well, not "just plain" Hank Kimball, just Hank Kimball....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath

If Fred is dead, then so is the pro-life movement. He is the last one left in the mix (except Hunter) that will take a pro-life position and stick to it in the face of opposition.


54 posted on 12/24/2007 8:02:36 PM PST by Ingtar (The LDS problem that Romney is facing is not his religion, but his recent Liberal Definitive Stands.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch
ARG Iowa

That about spells out the situation, although personally I'd a very more Rs...

ARRRRG!

55 posted on 12/24/2007 8:04:09 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Mojo
....that's "add a few more Rs".
56 posted on 12/24/2007 8:06:20 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug


Freepers are mostly in Thompson’s or Hunter’s corner yet Iowans are highly for Romney, Guillani, and Huckabee. Are Freepers that far off the national thought? If we are this country is headed to the sooey hole”

The liberal mainstream media controls what most people think.

Many Freepers don’t trust the liberal media and know what their agenda is.However some “freepers” still believe the liberal mainstream media especially those that buy all the lead in Chineese private company products stories we’ve seen in the liberal media.

So yeah, this country is in trouble if we Americans vote for a Democrat or Huckabee. I know Freepers at least won’t vote for the Huckster or Hillary though. I know I never would vote for either of those 2 socialists for any reason.


57 posted on 12/24/2007 8:08:17 PM PST by Democrat_media (Democrats are communists/Socialists.Socialism is an economic disaster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Very hard to believe the Thompson number.
This makes the choice even harder.

These numbers are scary as they indicate there is no one that has strong support.


58 posted on 12/24/2007 8:15:42 PM PST by HereInTheHeartland ("We have to drain the swamp" George Bush, September 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath

Yeah, guess it time to get behind Keyes.


59 posted on 12/24/2007 8:24:07 PM PST by Fred (The Demoroid Party is the Nadir of Nilhilism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Plutarch

Fred’s numbers are always ridiculously low with ARG. That has been the case since at least mid-October.


60 posted on 12/24/2007 8:26:12 PM PST by MitchellC (- www.fred08.com -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-144 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson