Posted on 12/26/2007 10:42:33 AM PST by Dane
The point of the article was to show Huckabee’s reaction - not the reporters questions. And what did seeBS show? Huckabee rising above, dare I say “turning the other cheek” in the face of those negative attacks from “a magician”. The new language? Huckabee chuckles. Please. We shouldn’t fall for such transparency.
Coors and Bud both stink. So does your left wing Christian Socialist pro-life liberal Democrat candidate Huckabee.
The joke is over. Let’s be serious. The GOP tried to ram Rudy down socons throats. Bad move. You’ve made your point by threatening us with the Statist theocrat Huck.
You’re point is well taken. We’re sorry. We’ll never do it again. Now please take the electrodes off of our testicles.
Let’s all get behind Fred Thompson. He appeals to all segments of the GOP base.
MR. HUCKABEE has taken a series of strong positions on the issue of immigration (illegal immigrants). He released a tough program for ridding the US of illegal aliens. He was endorsed by Mr. Jim Gilchrist.
My question to you is, Dane, do you support the position on illegal immigration of Mr. Huckabee this election?
Can you please kindly answer?
Yeah, right, Huckabee rising above negative campaigning. He is the guy that was running the push polling on Romney last month (Would you rather vote for a pristine Christian, or a devil worshipping Mormon?)
I don't agree with his positions on national security, taxes, immigration or the role of government as surrogate savior....so your point is moot.
SeeBS would love it if Huckabee got the nomination. I don’t expect that will happen so the only one who benefits from a good Huckabee showing in Iowa is McCain... and maybe Rudy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.