Skip to comments.
Exclusive: Ron Paul to make third party run on Constitution Party ticket
Modern Conservative ^
| Christopher Cook
Posted on 12/27/2007 6:02:59 AM PST by connell
ModernConservative.com has received a tip from a reliable source that may have election-shattering implications.
According to our source, an activist here in Arizona has been approached by the Ron Paul campaign; the campaign has requested that he run the Arizona effort to get Ron Paul on the general election ballot as a candidate of the Constitution Party.
Our source has requested anonymity, and we have agreed. We can, however, vouch for his/her general reliability. Our source also provided us with details that added credibility to the account. (Unfortunately, disclosure of those details would put at risk our promise of anonymity. We apologize for the unnamed sourcing and lack of further details, but those were the requirements that accompanied this revelation.)
We will keep you apprised of any new developments.
There has been a lot of analysis on the impact that Ron Paul has already had, and on the impact that he might...
(Excerpt) Read more at modernconservative.com ...
TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; 911truther; blameamericafirst; constitutionparty; cuckooforcocoapuffs; domesticenemy; elections; endorsedbydu; gop; heeeeeeeykoolaid; moveoncadidate; nutjob; ronniethecommie; ronpaul; ronpaulisanutjob; soros; tehronpaul; thedailykoscandidate; thirdparty; truthercandidate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 351 next last
1
posted on
12/27/2007 6:03:00 AM PST
by
connell
To: connell
To: connell
There goes the Constitution Party’s credibility.
3
posted on
12/27/2007 6:04:13 AM PST
by
The_Victor
(If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
To: connell

"I'm all ears."
4
posted on
12/27/2007 6:04:23 AM PST
by
big'ol_freeper
("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
To: connell
Big surprise there
Moveon.org's makin' there move....
5
posted on
12/27/2007 6:04:36 AM PST
by
JPJones
To: connell
Funded by Soros and move on.
6
posted on
12/27/2007 6:05:18 AM PST
by
GOP_Proud
(I'm really tired of the Paulie WalNUTS.)
To: connell
That could put me an a bad spot, if true.
If Huckabee wins the nomination (unlikely, but possible) I was thinking of voting Constitution Party. But if they run the nazi, then it looks like I have to vote for the Hapless Hick from Hope.
7
posted on
12/27/2007 6:05:21 AM PST
by
samtheman
(Fred Thompson '08)
To: connell
I’m invoking the 24 hour rule.
8
posted on
12/27/2007 6:05:31 AM PST
by
RKV
(He who has the guns makes the rules)
To: connell
9
posted on
12/27/2007 6:05:34 AM PST
by
RDTF
To: connell
Moonbat money for all!
10
posted on
12/27/2007 6:05:45 AM PST
by
CholeraJoe
("At last my arm is complete!" Sweeney Todd)
To: connell
That has been the plan all along. Hillary needs her Ross Perot.
11
posted on
12/27/2007 6:06:20 AM PST
by
rod1
To: connell
"...that may have election-shattering implications." Or not.
12
posted on
12/27/2007 6:07:02 AM PST
by
Sam's Army
(If Gruden drops the next 2 at home, all hell is gonna break loose)
To: The_Victor
13
posted on
12/27/2007 6:07:31 AM PST
by
savedbygrace
(SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
To: samtheman
I was considering that route, too, but with tickets full of RINOs and kooks, why not go whole hog and vote for Cynthia McKinney ? That’s how much of a joke this election is turning into.
14
posted on
12/27/2007 6:08:14 AM PST
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
To: samtheman
Hapless Hick from Hope II................
15
posted on
12/27/2007 6:08:29 AM PST
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: RKV
Im invoking the 24 hour rule.Good idea.
16
posted on
12/27/2007 6:08:35 AM PST
by
Erik Latranyi
(The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
To: Red Badger
Whoops. Thanks for the correction.
17
posted on
12/27/2007 6:09:13 AM PST
by
samtheman
(Fred Thompson '08)
To: connell
If true, this should be good for the republican candidate as a consensus of Paul haters here say his support comes from left wing, George Soros/Moveon moonbats.
18
posted on
12/27/2007 6:09:15 AM PST
by
Rb ver. 2.0
(Global warming is the new Marxism.)
To: connell
To: connell
Politics sure does make strange bed fellows. I can’t wait to see who will unify with whom next to better their chances to moveon up to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
To: connell
‘ModernConservative.com has received a tip from a reliable source that may have election-shattering implications.’
Couple of points.
1. This isn’t surprising to anyone with an interest in politics. IN fact its been predicted for months now.
2. Ron Paul is a fringe candidate as the polls demonstrate, so its hardly ‘election shattering’.
3. Modernconservative should change its name to something more accurate, like ‘1780 conservative’.
21
posted on
12/27/2007 6:09:25 AM PST
by
Badeye
(The two “no” votes were cast by Ron Paul and leftwing nut Dennis Kucinich.)
To: CholeraJoe
Why are they selling his money all over eBay, and more to the point, why is it selling for so much ? I’d think that’s how Soros is funnelling money to his campaign.
22
posted on
12/27/2007 6:09:26 AM PST
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
To: connell
..election-shattering implications.. For Who? The people that threw their money down the toilet?
23
posted on
12/27/2007 6:09:36 AM PST
by
BallyBill
(Serial Hit-N-Run poster)
To: RKV
Im invoking the 24 hour rule?
Shoot first, ask questions later?................
24
posted on
12/27/2007 6:09:43 AM PST
by
Red Badger
( We don't have science, but we do have consensus.......)
To: connell
Paul attracts moonbats, left and right. I doubt he will have the Perot effect and if he does it will take more from the dems than the pubs.
25
posted on
12/27/2007 6:09:52 AM PST
by
HerrBlucher
(He's the coolest thing around, gonna shut HRC down, gonna turn it on, wind it up, blow em out, FDT!)
To: connell
He might do it in the end, but on the other hand, I’m sure that this particular story is merely a plant by anti-Paul forces, intended to weaken his support in the GOP primaries.
To: connell
27
posted on
12/27/2007 6:10:53 AM PST
by
reagan_fanatic
(Ron Paul put the cuckoo in my Cocoa Puffs)
To: connell
That’d be good in a way in that more could see what a parasite on the GOP body he was, and hopefully he’ll draw off fewer conservative votes in the primaries. Bad in that he’ll hurt reality by not accepting it; but then, he’s Libertarian, and therefore OK with that.
28
posted on
12/27/2007 6:11:21 AM PST
by
BibChr
("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
To: fieldmarshaldj
They really need a none-of-the-above on presidential ballots.
29
posted on
12/27/2007 6:11:22 AM PST
by
samtheman
(Fred Thompson '08)
To: connell
Big mistake by the Constitution Party since GOP has not yet made a decision.
To: connell
Mrs. Clinton is certainly hoping for this, or better still for her, John McCain.
31
posted on
12/27/2007 6:12:47 AM PST
by
libertylover
(Liberals: Trying to convert the U.S. into a country the Founding Father's wouldn't recognize.)
Right outta the Clinton 2008 Playbook...
divide and conquer.
Perot Redux ..Version 3
32
posted on
12/27/2007 6:14:24 AM PST
by
evad
(.)
To: HerrBlucher
. . . if he does it will take more from the dems than the pubs . . .I seriously doubt it. Soros may own Osama Obama, but he has a shared agenda with the witch. He will tell Paul to veer right in the general election so his own zombies come home to roost in their natural home of the Democrat Party, the bigger Soros enterprise.
33
posted on
12/27/2007 6:14:33 AM PST
by
Vigilanteman
(Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
To: fieldmarshaldj
The FBI recently raided the Evansville, IN headquarters of Liberty Dollar, the producer of the alternative currency, confiscating records and the illegal currency. Therefore, these items have become collector’s pieces. I’m surprised the Feds haven’t shut down the E-bay sites selling it. Maybe the Feds are waiting for money to actually change hands and then will swoop down and arrest both buyer and seller for money laundering.
34
posted on
12/27/2007 6:14:47 AM PST
by
CholeraJoe
("At last my arm is complete!" Sweeney Todd)
To: Rb ver. 2.0
If true, this should be good for the republican candidate as a consensus of Paul haters here say his support comes from left wing, George Soros/Moveon moonbats.That statement makes about as much sense as a Ron Paul speech on national security. The left wants Ron Paul to run so that, just like Ross Perot in '92 and '96, he can siphon off votes that would otherwise be cast for the Republican candidate, thereby facilitating the election of the former first co-dependent or B. Hussein Obomanation.
35
posted on
12/27/2007 6:15:00 AM PST
by
big'ol_freeper
("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
To: connell
I have had a disdain for the CP ever since I got sucked into supporting them and then when I realized that they are nothing but a bunch of political opportunists who prey on suckers, like me, who part with their hard-earned money and dump it down a black hole.
Their ads here in Iowa during the 2000 and 2004 elections were aimed at defeating Bush--not Gore and Kerrey. They were trying to convince me (and other gullible voters) that Bush was more dangerous than Gore and Kerry. They're nuts.
They have never won an election and they will never win an election. It's very easy to stand there beating your breast and asking the nation to believe that you are morally superior, knowing full well, you will never have to prove anything because you're never going to have to deliver on your promises.
The CP can go take a flying leap and the only people they can help are the Democrats. Suckers!!!
To: Brilliant
37
posted on
12/27/2007 6:15:42 AM PST
by
RedRover
To: connell
No clinton has ever been elected president by a majority of votes cast.
38
posted on
12/27/2007 6:16:30 AM PST
by
Nomorjer Kinov
(If the opposite of "pro" is "con" , what is the opposite of progress?)
To: samtheman
39
posted on
12/27/2007 6:18:30 AM PST
by
GraniteStateConservative
(...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
To: connell
This is how Clintons get elected. What a jerk.
40
posted on
12/27/2007 6:19:02 AM PST
by
gramho12
To: big'ol_freeper
But, according to the paul haters here his supporters are mostly leftwing moonbats. How can that hurt the R chances?
41
posted on
12/27/2007 6:19:22 AM PST
by
Rb ver. 2.0
(Global warming is the new Marxism.)
To: GraniteStateConservative
Is that Huckabee running with Richard Pryor?
42
posted on
12/27/2007 6:20:12 AM PST
by
samtheman
(Fred Thompson '08)
To: connell
My bet is that Ronnie will draw more votes away from the Demagogue candidate than the GOP's candidate.
43
posted on
12/27/2007 6:21:45 AM PST
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam is a religion of peace, and Muslims reserve the right to kill anyone who says otherwise.)
To: samtheman
They really need a none-of-the-above on presidential ballots.That is already in place; they call it the write-in vote. If no candidate offered is acceptable, write in one who is.
44
posted on
12/27/2007 6:21:56 AM PST
by
JimRed
("Hey, hey, Teddy K., how many girls did you drown today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW!)
To: Rb ver. 2.0
But, according to the paul haters here his supporters are mostly leftwing moonbats. How can that hurt the R chances?I've not taken part in many of the Ron Paul threads because I don't see him as a serious candidate and I do see him as a nut. I believe when "paul haters" say his support comes from "leftwing moonbats" they mean his financial support to achieve what I described...the election of the former first co-dependent or B. Hussein Obamanation.
45
posted on
12/27/2007 6:22:16 AM PST
by
big'ol_freeper
("Those who hammer their guns into plows will plow for those who do not." ~ Thomas Jefferson)
To: Nomorjer Kinov
No clinton has ever been elected president by a majority of votes cast.Translation, for those of you in Rio Linda....
...a Third Party candidate is exactly what is needed to ensure Sen Clinton the White House.
46
posted on
12/27/2007 6:22:51 AM PST
by
Erik Latranyi
(The Democratic Party will not exist in a few years....we are watching history unfold before us.)
To: E. Pluribus Unum
I agree...if true; I don’t see this helping the Democrats at all.
47
posted on
12/27/2007 6:23:45 AM PST
by
who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
To: The_Victor
48
posted on
12/27/2007 6:23:58 AM PST
by
NonValueAdded
(Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
To: connell
Damn, this day is just full of "good" news.
Excuse me while I hurl.
49
posted on
12/27/2007 6:24:26 AM PST
by
steveegg
(I am John Doe, and a monthly donor)
To: connell
It’ll hurt the dem’s more than us. Paul’s getting his support from the looney fringes. Not the kind of people who would vote for a GOP candidate anyway. Let him run. I hope Bloomberg runs too.
50
posted on
12/27/2007 6:24:37 AM PST
by
pgkdan
(Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions - G.K. Chesterton)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-100, 101-150, 151-200 ... 351 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson