Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Goodbye New Hampshire, hello South Carolina (Fred moves on)
boston.com ^ | January 6, 2008 | Bryan Bender, Globe Staff

Posted on 01/07/2008 7:52:09 AM PST by rightinthemiddle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last
To: RexBeach
OK, I gotta ask, what happens if Fred loses SC? Is that end of his campaign?

Anything worse than a strong 2nd in SC would be the end of Fred's campaign IMO. He has put all his eggs in SC, just as Rudy has gone ALL-IN in Florida.

That said, Fred may stick around through Super Tuesday as there are a lot of states that day in which he is polling strongly (I.E. Alabama where he leads comfortably in the last poll) -- but if he struggles in SC I would expect the Super Tuesday support to dry up a lot.

So, he may not drop out after SC, but I think he has to Win or barely place second to have any chance at all.

That said, I have donated and sincerely hope something helps Fred catch fire with the electorate soon.

21 posted on 01/07/2008 8:16:03 AM PST by commish (Freedom tastes sweetest to those who have fought to protect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
OK, I gotta ask, what happens if Fred loses SC? Is that end of his campaign?

My guess it will depend on how well he does there.

Keep in mind his campaighn is not well covered by the media and a lot of voters don't know him as a conservative politician.

But once he gets some good press and conservatives discover that he is the only reliable conservative in the race they will rally behind him (i.e. "saddle up").

At that point in time the race will come down to a Rino and Fred. And the Rino will be either Mitt or Rudy.

22 posted on 01/07/2008 8:16:19 AM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan (qtr)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

A perfect analysis.


23 posted on 01/07/2008 8:16:38 AM PST by toddlintown (Five bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

I think you’re going to get your wish in NH.

As for SC, Fred’s got a lot of work to do to come in number one there. He can either win or survive with a strong second place finish. Not saying he’d get out of the racve if neither of those occur, but it will become progressively more difficult for him if anything other than one of those outcomes is THE outcome.


24 posted on 01/07/2008 8:17:02 AM PST by DangerDanger ("Libertarianism is the Heart and Soul of Conservatism." - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: samtheman

You are wrong. If McCain wins in NH, he is the prohibitive favorite to win the Republican nomination.

mcCain will next win in Michigan with independents and RATS crossing over.

In SC, Thompson and Huckabee will split the conservative vote, and McCain will win there, too.

Then it’s over.


25 posted on 01/07/2008 8:17:11 AM PST by mwl1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
It should bem then he can let Duncan Hunter take over, and if Fred endorses McPain, he will have done the nation a horrible diservice. His campaign shows that he waited to long to announce and he has contributed little to the copnservative evolution of the overall campaign, except put Hunter in his shadow.

When Fred drops out, Hunter will be the only conservative candidate left, watch for a Hunter surge after South Carolina.

26 posted on 01/07/2008 8:17:16 AM PST by Candor7 (Background on Muslim Infiltration of the Pentagon, this is SERIES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Has anyone broken down the allotment of delegates across the states? I’d be curious to see where finishing second in every race would get a candidate. It seems that we’ll have multiple winners, the candidate that finishes second in enough races might get the 1230 needed to win the nomination.


27 posted on 01/07/2008 8:17:31 AM PST by mainerforglobalwarming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Thanks for another knowledgeable source for Fred endorsing Mc Cain.....You ca get some rest now.


28 posted on 01/07/2008 8:22:08 AM PST by captnorb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

Techinically, Iowa doesn’t select the convention delegates until June at the State Convention. The precincts are free to make their own rules regarding how the state convention delegates are bound/not bound at the state convention..

From the following:
http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P08/IA-R.phtml#0103

....Here’s how we estimate the delegate count on 3 January 2008: (Based on the January 2008 Iowa Caucus results from iowavotes2008.com. Note that zero national convention delegates are allocated during the Precinct Caucuses - national convention delegates are first elected in June.)....

One can assume they will be somewhere close to the Jan. Caucus results but not assume that is 100% the case.


29 posted on 01/07/2008 8:23:06 AM PST by deport (31 days Super Tuesday -- [ Meanwhile:-- Cue Spooky Music--])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle
Last nights debate bode well for 3 people imo, Fred, Rudy and Mitt. Does anyone notice in these debates how when Fred speaks the other candidates are all listening intently and respectfully? Its as if one might say to the other "hey be quite, Freds speaking."

I will say Fred, Rudy and Mitt, in that order seem to be the best candidates. If a prince of Saudi Arabia offered all the candidates 10 million I think all but Rudy and Fred would have taken it. That alone tells me where Rudys heart is and how he thinks concerning America. Fred is more conservative but if we're wanting to trust someones word, Huckabee, McCain are lacking and Romney has no core values so its hard to tell what he will do.

30 posted on 01/07/2008 8:24:39 AM PST by normy (Don't take it personally, just take it seriously.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prokopton

“Didn’t Fred just pick up 25% of the 12 delegates in WY? This is just as big as if he picked up 25% of the 12 delegates in NH.”

Yes, I believe Fred did come in second in Wyoming as far as delegates go. Is there a website or anyone who is keeping a running delegate count through the primary? I made another donation to the red truck at fred08.com and hope all Fred supporters will help any way they can! GO FRED!


31 posted on 01/07/2008 8:25:37 AM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mwl1; jellybean; Politicalmom; Sturm Ruger; Yaelle
In SC, Thompson and Huckabee will split the conservative vote. . . .

That is my fear: The single-issue Dobson mind-numbed robots voting for Huck, pulling away social-conservative votes that should otherwise go to Fred. Thus the Huck people may end up helping to nominate a LESS pro-life nominee.

32 posted on 01/07/2008 8:26:06 AM PST by Charles Henrickson (FRederalist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

“Wrong. Iowa had a straw poll months ago. Their CAUCUS last week decided the delegates, but they are assigned proportionally”

Iowa Republicans, who have 40 delegates, conducted a straw poll but elected no convention delegates Thursday.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/01/05/us/politics/05cnd-wyoming.html


33 posted on 01/07/2008 8:26:15 AM PST by Prokopton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mwl1

You are wrong. If McCain wins in NH, he is the prohibitive favorite to win the Republican nomination.


McCain stomped Bush in NH in 2000 and didn’t win the nomination.


34 posted on 01/07/2008 8:27:05 AM PST by deport (31 days Super Tuesday -- [ Meanwhile:-- Cue Spooky Music--])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

I thought he and Hunter got 2 each.


35 posted on 01/07/2008 8:27:48 AM PST by RockinRight (Huck Supporters: Being Christian doesn't make one an automatic conservative. Far from it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle
Funny thing is that here in SC I have not seen any Fred campaign messages, not tv, no radio, no signs....nothing! I saw the first Obama commercial here over the weekend and I saw the same commercial for him over and over again so he is making his presence known here in SC. The biggest push here that I have seen (and I am in the upstate of SC) has been from Ron Paul. His radio commercials have been playing here for about 6 months and his signs are up everywhere! I mean signs made on bed sheets, signs at the intersections, signs on fences, signs everywhere!! Other then him, I see a few Huckabee signs and hear a few commercials from time to time. I saw a few Hillary signs but those are few and far between in my area. Romney has a lot of support in my area, I see signs and hear his radio and tv ads.
But so far, I have yet to see ANY Fred
36 posted on 01/07/2008 8:28:07 AM PST by 4everontheRight ("Boy, those French: They have a different word for everything! "- Steve Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightinthemiddle

Great News! Fred really is the real conservative and the candidate who has been chosen by all of the pro-life organizations who have endorsed so far! GO FRED!


37 posted on 01/07/2008 8:28:37 AM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
When Fred drops out, Hunter will be the only conservative candidate left, watch for a Hunter surge after South Carolina.

Was hunter even in the latest debate? And didn't he get 0% in Iowa? If so, I guess getting 13% would be a huge surge. Heck since it's a division by zero error I can't even calculate the rate of increase. Fact is Hunter at this point in not a factor even if he endorses Fred. At best it gets him 1% more, but he needs to jump 10 to 20 points to really take get noticed with the media blackout he's facing.

NOTE: I'm not saying Hunter is a good guy or a great conservative. It's jut he hasn't gotten noticed at all and polling 0% in Iowa means he should drop out and help back a candidate that most closely has his views.

38 posted on 01/07/2008 8:29:34 AM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 4everontheRight

How populated is your part of the state? And is is more democrat or rebpulican?

if you’re in a big area that is heavily republican that’s not good for Fred at all. BUt if you’re in a liberal area then it’s probably a matter of spending money where it will have the biggest payoff.


39 posted on 01/07/2008 8:31:38 AM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: for-q-clinton

Most likely Jeb Bush would be chosen in a brokered convention.

Especially if GWB works behind the scenes.


40 posted on 01/07/2008 8:32:22 AM PST by barryg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson