Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Medved: Call Off the "RINO Hunt" [Barf Alert]
townhall.com ^ | 01/07/2008 | Michael Medved

Posted on 01/07/2008 2:03:00 PM PST by jmc813

There’s an obnoxious and destructive term that’s begun to do real damage to the Republican Party. That term is “RINO,” or “R.I.N.O.” – an acronym for “Republican In Name Only.” Angry conservatives use the term to attack purported moderates in their own party. Recently, Mike Huckabee and John McCain have been attacked as “RINO’s” –Governor Schwarzenegger of California regularly draws that denunciation. Those who make war on RINO’s, however, ought to confront an obvious question: would you really prefer that such people drop the Republican designation? How does it help if politicians or office-holders with whom you disagree leave your party and join the opposition? When alleged “RINO” Jim Jeffords of Vermont left the GOP and joined the Democrats, it gave them control of the US Senate. When another RINO, Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island, lost his Senate seat in 2006, it also gave the Democrats control; if Chafee had won, we’d still have a Republican majority and GOP committee chairs. The truth is that no successful political party has ever been built on ideological purity. You can construct a majority coalition by bringing people into your party, not by driving them away. It’s childish and self-destructive to wage war based on some notion of “real conservatism” with those who want to align themselves with your side. Ronald Reagan himself used to say that “if somebody agrees with me 70% of the time, rather than 100%, that doesn’t make him my enemy.” Democrats understand this principle--- they never attack “DINO’s,” Democrats In Name Only. In fact, they understand the usefulness of such figures: they put forward several conservative Democrats in key Congressional districts in 2006, and those “DINO’s” helped them win a majority in the House. If Republicans continue to express contempt and hostility for those they consider “RINO’s,” they’ve got to get ready for “DIMO’s” – Democrats In the Majority Only.” It’s time, in other words, for sane GOP partisans to call off the silly and suicidal RINO hunt.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: medved; rino
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-165 next last
To: toddlintown

Barry, I’m sorry. You’re just a shill for Rudy.


61 posted on 01/07/2008 2:36:37 PM PST by toddlintown (Five bullets and Lennon goes down. Yet not one hit Yoko. Discuss..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

I guess a RINO is better than a WINO in office.

But becoming a RINO takes a lot of time. Few Republicans earn that title the day they get elected. It takes years of corruption and deals with the lobbyist before one Republican gets the deserved title RINO.

Wahh Wahh Wahh.


62 posted on 01/07/2008 2:37:16 PM PST by o_zarkman44 (No Bull in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Kudos to Medved for the courage to point out how self-destructive our tactics are. Better to win elections following a "Big Tent" strategy, and post-election work to get favored policies enacted through our political representatives who will listen and be more inclined to respond favorably. I fear we often fail to appreciate how liberal policies become embedded and impervious to change when Democrats take over the reins of power.

.

63 posted on 01/07/2008 2:37:26 PM PST by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
It’s time, in other words, for sane GOP partisans to call off the silly and suicidal RINO hunt.

I'm not a "GOP partisan". I'm a republican. What else would you call a Republican who's politics don't support the republic?

64 posted on 01/07/2008 2:37:44 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: barryg
You need moderates and indepedents.

***************

Well, that's a new one to me.

65 posted on 01/07/2008 2:38:11 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: dinoparty
Calling people like McCain RINOs is over the top.

You may be right, he really is more deomrat than he is rino.

66 posted on 01/07/2008 2:38:39 PM PST by org.whodat (What's the difference between a Democrat and a republican????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

We don’t need RINO field fillers in the race when there are plenty of CONSERVATIVES capable of taking the job.


67 posted on 01/07/2008 2:39:11 PM PST by o_zarkman44 (No Bull in 08!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

I’ve appreciated all the information I’ve gotten from Medved regarding religion, pop culture and especially the Israeli/palestinian age old conflict. But I lost all respect for him regarding conservative politics when he jumped on the bandwagon supporting illegal immigration. Thats the major reason why he supports McLame and the major reason why I consider McLame a democrap rather than just a stupid RINO...........


68 posted on 01/07/2008 2:39:45 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
While I find that Medved often disappoints, he is right about this. It makes no sense to presume to run a RINO out of office unless there is the realistic prospect of replacing him with a better republican. Conceding a seat to the 'rats is indeed self-defeating and stupid.
69 posted on 01/07/2008 2:39:53 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pgyanke
he has a good point. We attack our liberal-leaning Republicans

Support the RINOs and we still lose and they win..........

70 posted on 01/07/2008 2:41:31 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jmc813

Medved, you ignorant slut.


71 posted on 01/07/2008 2:42:21 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~~~Jihad Fever -- Catch It !~~~ (Backup tag: "Live Fred or Die"))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: barryg
Santorum lost because his Dem opponent ran on conservative ideas.

I was tricked by Ahnold (I fell for the old, "He's better than a dem and he can get elected) and now you can't even call him a RINO, he's just a flat out dem!

The conservative party should stay conservative and I still think you belong over at the DUmp!

72 posted on 01/07/2008 2:42:57 PM PST by CAluvdubya (I won't stop supporting Hunter until he tells me to...GO HUNTER '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
People do get carried away with the "RINO" charges.

Majority or governing parties demand more of their representatives than minority or opposition parties. So Republicans are stricter about ideology than the Democrats have been. That may change if the Democrats win the next election.

Thirty years ago, there was a real difference between the average Northeastern Republican Representative and "real RINOs" like John Lindsay or Charles Goodell, Edward Brooke, Jacob Javits or George Aiken.

Nowadays, just about any Republican who can get elected in this part of the country is called a RINO. That's tantamount to writing off an entire region of the country.

73 posted on 01/07/2008 2:43:45 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

I’m not for party over principle... it was an observation.


74 posted on 01/07/2008 2:45:22 PM PST by pgyanke (Duncan Hunter 08--You want to elect a conservative? Then support a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: CAluvdubya

Why did Lynn Swann lose? Was Ed Rendell also running as a conservative??


75 posted on 01/07/2008 2:45:32 PM PST by barryg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco
Support the RINOs and we still lose and they win..........

Not necessarily. As others have pointed out, the only thing accomplished by running a RINO out of office without a conservative Republican to replace him is losing control of Congress.

76 posted on 01/07/2008 2:48:00 PM PST by pgyanke (Duncan Hunter 08--You want to elect a conservative? Then support a conservative!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Sorry Mike. We're just getting warmed up!!


77 posted on 01/07/2008 2:48:03 PM PST by ovrtaxt (People seemed to be content, $50 paid the rent, FREAKS WERE IN A CIRCUS TENT, Those were the days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: barryg

Lynn Swann lost because people didn’t completely trust a football player.


78 posted on 01/07/2008 2:48:10 PM PST by CAluvdubya (I won't stop supporting Hunter until he tells me to...GO HUNTER '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

Overall, there is a very broad base that can be used in describing a republican, or a conservative. However, some people like to claim to be conservative and are not, and some people like to claim to be republicans but are not.

Political parties will shift in their ideology.

But I will not compromise my principles, and I vote for the best conservative I can find. I do not go by the party label.

As for the Regan quote, I like it - a lot. BUT we all need to remember that if you agree with someone else 100% of the time, you probably aren’t thinking!


79 posted on 01/07/2008 2:49:49 PM PST by DieNarrin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Sorry Michael but I live in California.

Several years ago we had a governor who run the state 14 billion into the red by spending tax money from the dot com bubble before it was collected, supported gun control and the gay agenda.

We mounted a recall, organized, signed petitions and voted him out of office. It was a great demonstration of democracy in action.

Problem is, we elected a guy who claims to be a republican who supports the gay agenda and gun control and who has run the state 14 billion into the red by spending tax money from the housing bubble before it was collected.

No more RINOs, no more pseudo cons.

80 posted on 01/07/2008 2:50:26 PM PST by InABunkerUnderSF ("Gun Control" is not about the guns. "Illegal Immigration" is not about the immigration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson