Homosexuals 'Born That Way' and Erotic Sex Taught to 8th and 10th Graders Challenged by TMLC

thomasmore.org ^

[tpanther]

ANN ARBOR, MI – In oral arguments last week, the Thomas More Law Center asked Maryland state circuit court judge William Rowan III to overturn a Maryland Board of Education ruling that approves of public schools in Montgomery County, Maryland, teaching 8th and 10th graders that homosexuality is innate—meaning they are born that way. The schools also show how to use condoms in anal and oral sex.

Montgomery educators were forced to defend their new sex curriculum that promotes anal sex, homosexuality, bisexuality and transvestitism despite strong opposition from several pro-family groups. The controversial new curriculum was adopted as a result of pressure by homosexual advocacy groups.

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Anal sex is abusive, no matter who’s “catching.”

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

Gladly — my wife disagrees.

Eewww.

[tpanther]

But in some cases, still no rights, simply because some parents actually condone it and see nothing wrong with it. The very fabric of family as we understand it is being attacked from every angle from within schools and from without, and in some cases parents find about crap like this for the very first time when it directly concerns them!

For an example the Georgia ACLU threatened our kids school board with a suit if they didn’t remove the word ‘Christmas’ from the school calendar. No notification to the parents, no nothing.

I personally found out when the story showed up on O’Reilly.

But yes all too oten parents don’t have the courage, they move or home school while we SHOULD be forcing these lunatics to home school or pay for private school!

[tpanther]

I personally think it’s psychotic to say God and religion belongs at home or somehow in it’s place, but sexual practice of any kind is somehow the school’s responsibility?

What about getting reading, science, and writing right and give the parents all the resources they need to have these discussions where THEY belong? IN THE HOME!

And you know as well as I do, if it were that simple it would be one thing...condom use and nothing more, they don’t have to explain in detail they should put a condom on for each and every orifice, how about keep your condom on until the sex is over for starters?

I mean parents are complaining girls as young as 10 get pregnant and are whisked away to abortion clinics WITHOUT parental notification! Sheesh! The schools should are placed in charge of every aspect of a kids life including outside the school now!

It’s not like there’s any evidence they’re IMPROVING anything at all either!

[grey_whiskers]

It is the implied approval by giving perversion equal time with heterosexual intercourse; the subtle PC pressure to pretend that such perversions are morally equal and "who are we to judge"; and of course the opportunities such talk creates for recruitment of new homosexuals. They aren't "breeders" you know.

Not to mention the opportunities to add to the "naughty teacher" ping list...

Welcome to FR, by the way. Did you just show up to post this?

Do you like kitties?

Cheers!

[grey_whiskers]

I might as well add a male voice to this discussion. Dr. and Mrs. Whiskers have been married over 20 years, and the only impediment to our relations is the 24-hour a day pace of our teenagers :-(

Cheers!

[Danae]

I don’t care what anyone does behind closed doors. This is NOT a subject to be taught in Public school.

NO EXCEPTIONS. There is NO excuse or reasoning strong enough to change my mind on the matter.

[Yosemitest]

Romans chapter 1 blows that satanic theory out of the water.

[tpanther]

Which satanic theory is that?

[wagglebee]

Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

[gidget7]

I dare say, anyone who doesn’t think so is to one extent or another negligent, as far as the children of our society are concerned. There are consequences for sex of all kinds, consequences these children are not being made aware of, nor are they prepared for them because they can’t be. Consequences that happen regardless of whether a condom is used or not.

[Tenniel2]

::chortle!::

Then there's the alternative version, in which the BBW accosts Little Red in the woods and announces that he's going to f*** her, to which she replies stoutly "Like hell you are. You're going to eat me, like the book says!"

(slinking off, glancing nervously around for Sister Mary Elephant...)

[gidget7]

I think the use of the term erotic, is meant to show that it is erotic to show these things to children. Just as porn would be. You don’t feed curiosity in young pubescent children, because they are yet undeveloped and unable to handle sexual relationships, physically, mentally, and emotionally. And yes, these images would be erotic to most kids.

[Tax-chick]

Congratulations on your happy and vibrant marriage! Mrs. Don-o and the excellent Don-o himself had their 19th anniversary in December, while my unFReeped spouse and I will celebrate 19 early in February. (And not expecting, for once!)

If you look down a few posts from my #60-something, you’ll see the link to the British newspaper article. The woman is such a dingbat! She’s planning to leave her husband when her kids are grown (assuming he doesn’t dump her first, bless his heart!) and imagines she’ll spend her 50’s and 60’s screwing around. DUH, LADY! Women in their 50’s aren’t exactly top of the line in the cheap sex biz, even if they’re really easy.

[Tax-chick]

that it is erotic to show these things to children.

Maybe. It's not erotic to me ... I'm not turned on by the thought of putting on a condom for anal sex, nor the depiction. (My view of the male anatomy is influenced by many, many years of changing little boys' diapers ...). Teenage boys, I'm told, find just about anything erotic. Girls are less likely to; they're interested in relationship (even if it's an instrumental relationship: I give you sex, you give me status) and can probably tell that they're basically being used as toilets.

That's what I meant by saying they're using "erotic" where they really mean "perverted."

[Albion Wilde]

>> Sorry. I do. Gladly — my wife disagrees.

Too much information.

[Albion Wilde]

Well, newbie, nice try, but no cigar.

The schools have no business teaching any kind of sexual techniques to children for any reason. That is the parents’ job. If they don’t, it’s still not the job of government schools.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Thank you for the congrats, and the same back atcha.

Wisdom is supposed to come with age, but I admit to be perplexed by a growing number of things as time goes on.

I don't understand why, when when you're traveling in a car, the scenery seems to rotate like a great wheel, with the hub at the horizon and the near trees flashing past you?

I don't understand why, when I'm on Baxter Street, I can see Buffalo Mountain, but as I come closer, the mountain seems to disappear behind trees. How can that be?

I don't understand how I have deserved the love of my excellent husband, or how I have retained it deserving or not.

That must require a perspective that goes beyond what my walnut-head can grasp. I'm sort of living with the oddness of it.

[Albion Wilde]

If you read the entire article, you see that the work "erotic" is NOT used to describe what most people would think is a turn-on; it is used specifically in the legal sense to denote sexual acts which are done for pleasure but cannot result in conception. Here are the passages from the article:

...although state law does not define the word “erotic,” Bolling argued that a Maryland law which prohibits classroom material that “portrays erotic techniques of sexual intercourse,” makes video demonstrations of the use of condoms in anal and oral sex illegal. Bolling argued that if a sexual act is not done for a procreative purpose, it is an erotic technique.

Thus, the six year battle boils down to two questions posed by Bolling in this latest court skirmish: Can the school board legally teach students that homosexuality is innate despite rulings to the contrary by the state’s highest court? And, can the health lessons discuss sex acts other than copulation?

[Albion Wilde]

work = word