Skip to comments.
Clinton health plan may mean tapping pay
Associated Press via YahooNews ^
| Associated Press
| Charles Babington
Posted on 02/03/2008 8:52:55 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper
Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton said Sunday she might be willing to garnish the wages of workers who refuse to buy health insurance to achieve coverage for all Americans.
The New York senator has criticized presidential rival Barack Obama for pushing a health plan that would not require universal coverage. Clinton has not always specified the enforcement measures she would embrace, but when pressed on ABC's "This Week," she said: "I think there are a number of mechanisms" that are possible, including "going after people's wages, automatic enrollment."
(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: agenda21; communism; healthypeople2010; hillary; hillarycare; hillaryscandals; socializedmedicine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-143 next last
To: Berlin_Freeper
She said: “I think there are a number of mechanisms” that are possible, including “going after people’s wages, automatic enrollment.”
Yep, there it is, folks...a socialist answer from a true socialist. In the mind of the Hildebeast, what’s yours is the government’s, for whatever purpose she sees as appropriate.
This woman is dangerous. She must be stopped.
41
posted on
02/03/2008 9:15:30 AM PST
by
PubliusMM
(RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion...)
To: mewzilla
Can't say you weren't warned...
People were more than adequately warned about these people in 1992 and elected them president not once, but twice.
The fact that Hillary Clinton is not only a candidate for president but has actually gotten votes should be enough for all of us to seriously consider that we may not have a republic much longer.
To: Berlin_Freeper
And McLame proposes giving a
$5,000 tax credit for health insurance. So where's the money going to come for that? Hmmmm? Sounds like either more deficit or higher taxes to me.
If the Repubs nominate a conservative at their convention, I'm there. If they nominate a socialist, as it appears they are preparing to do, no thanks.
(quoted from another thread)
43
posted on
02/03/2008 9:16:23 AM PST
by
markomalley
(Extra ecclesiam nulla salus)
To: Mygirlsmom
Trouble is, Obama wants to control how much everyone can earn in the first place--which is worse? I agree, Obama is more frightening; however, in terms of headlines, this one is devastating for Hillary.
To: Berlin_Freeper
I'm not in agreement with anything Hitlery does, but let me tell you, I sacrificed part of pay increases for health insurance. In other words I payed for my own health insurance. So have many Americans and most were done during labor negotiations. It has been happening for years, perhaps over 30 years. YOU GET NOTHING FREE. Now, how do you want to do it.
It would be nice if a few of you that paid your way would let us know.
45
posted on
02/03/2008 9:18:31 AM PST
by
Logical me
(Oh, well!!!)
To: GiovannaNicoletta
The fact that Hillary Clinton is not only a candidate for president but has actually gotten votes should be enough for all of us to seriously consider that we may not have a republic much longer.Puts me in mind of this quote....
The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money.
Alexis de Tocqueville
Works for the Executive Branch, too.
46
posted on
02/03/2008 9:18:44 AM PST
by
mewzilla
(In politics the middle way is none at all. John Adams)
To: Beagle8U
Looks like Hillary wants to adopt RomneyCare! Well, let's be honest, With Hillary's plan abortion would be free. Romney's is the more conservative requiring a $50 copay.
47
posted on
02/03/2008 9:19:15 AM PST
by
Graybeard58
( Remember and pray for SSgt. Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: Berlin_Freeper
48
posted on
02/03/2008 9:19:36 AM PST
by
callisto
To: Berlin_Freeper
big gubment
49
posted on
02/03/2008 9:20:19 AM PST
by
Doogle
(USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
To: gingerky
Yep, this will cost her the election. Naw. The people she panders to love that kind of talk. Further, I have talked to conservatives so brainwashed that they believe they need to be taxed more. Incredible.
50
posted on
02/03/2008 9:21:45 AM PST
by
Nuc1
(NUC1 Sub pusher SSN 668 (Liberals Aren't Patriots))
To: dennisw
Hows her Heinous going to garnish the wages of legal and illegal immigrants who work off the books? Of course she wont touch them Right dennisw, they will freeload on our dime as usual. No pride at all. Just show up in someone elses land with your hand out.
Regards
51
posted on
02/03/2008 9:22:25 AM PST
by
ARE SOLE
(Agents Ramos and Campean are in prison at this very moment.. (A "Concerned Citizen".)
To: Berlin_Freeper
Atlas Puked!!!
52
posted on
02/03/2008 9:22:44 AM PST
by
Chode
(American Hedonist ©®)
To: Berlin_Freeper
"This Week," she said: "I think there are a number of mechanisms" that are possible, including "going after people's wages, automatic enrollment." Fodder for revolt if implemented!!!
53
posted on
02/03/2008 9:25:11 AM PST
by
varon
(Allegiance to the constitution, always. Allegiance to a political party, never.)
To: Berlin_Freeper
Clinton has not always specified the enforcement measures she would embrace, but when pressed on ABC's "This Week," she said: "I think there are a number of mechanisms" that are possible, including "going after people's wages, automatic enrollment."These people are Stalinists!
54
posted on
02/03/2008 9:25:47 AM PST
by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: Berlin_Freeper
“clinton health plan may mean tapping pay...”
her health plan is the following, in a nutshell....
nationalization of everything.
(heil hillary)
55
posted on
02/03/2008 9:26:11 AM PST
by
ripley
To: markomalley
Definition of a tax credit:
“The direct dollar-for-dollar reduction of an individual’s tax liability; compare with tax deduction, which reduces an individual’s tax liability only in proportion to his/her tax bracket.”
Basically, you take the total a person has to pay in taxes based on his or her tax bracket and reduce that number by $5,000. I think this could lead to the rise of health savings plans, which would function similar to IRA’s. All earnings growth would be tax deferred and I would be in favor of tax free distributions as well. All distributions from the plan must, of course, go to health care costs. Everybody is forced to fund their plan, but they write off the full contribution as a tax credit. It’s actually a potentially great idea, in my opinion.
To: ARE SOLE
It’s remarkable it took this long for the media to drag this out of her. Well okay maybe not that remarkable...
57
posted on
02/03/2008 9:26:29 AM PST
by
Berlin_Freeper
(Huckabee: Romney didn’t hit conservative political puberty until he was 60.)
To: Berlin_Freeper
And remember, she has a million ideas, but we can’t afford them all. Not that we can ‘afford’ mandated health insurance, but that won’t stop Mrs. Filegate from trying.
58
posted on
02/03/2008 9:27:36 AM PST
by
Ghost of Philip Marlowe
(If Hillary is elected, her legacy will be telling the American people: Better put some ice on that.)
To: Berlin_Freeper
Well why not? It’s not like (in their view) it’s YOUR money, or anything...
59
posted on
02/03/2008 9:29:07 AM PST
by
bigbob
(2)
To: Berlin_Freeper
"going after people's wages, automatic enrollment." She's told us numerous times her socialist plans for the country and how she's planning to eliminate individual freedom and choice.
She's a change agent but not all change is good.
60
posted on
02/03/2008 9:29:25 AM PST
by
cowboyway
("No damn man kills me and lives." -- Nathan Bedford Forrest)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-143 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson