Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Spy satellite to crash in early March
abc ^

Posted on 02/08/2008 3:25:12 PM PST by maquiladora

February 8, 2008 -- US 193, the U.S. spy satellite that has failed while in orbit, will crash into the Earth during the first week of March, U.S. officials say.

The only problem is, no one seems to have the faintest idea as to where debris from the 5,000-pound spacecraft will land.

The military satellite was launched in December 2006. It carries a sophisticated and secret imaging sensor. It experienced a power and computer failure almost immediately after entering space.

The satellite has been wandering in orbit in a random path ever since. Without power, the satellite was doomed to eventually crash into the Earth's atmosphere and break up.

The U.S. is worried that pieces of the satellite may land in another country, allowing that nation's leaders to examine secret American technology.

U.S. trackers will have a better idea where US 193 is going when it begins its descent into the atmosphere, 59 miles above the planet. It will burn up from the immense friction with atmospheric molecules and fall within 30 minutes. People on the ground near the entry point may be able to see flares from the craft.

The debris could be scattered over several hundred miles. Some of it could be hazardous. The satellite contains the toxic rocket fuel hydrazine.

Short-term exposure to hydrazine could cause coughin, irritated throat and lungs, convulsions, tremors and seizures. Long-term exposure could damage the liver, kidney and reproductive organs.

Bottom line: if the satellite happens to fall in your neighborhood, don't touch it!


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: debris; espionage; satellite; space
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: edcoil

Nope!


21 posted on 02/08/2008 4:10:13 PM PST by G Larry (HILLARY CARE = DYING IN LINE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: prophetic

if it has a wobble because of not being deployed correctly, such as it’s solar panels only being slightly opened and uneven on each side, and with no rotation to keep it centered around it’s normal mass, then it’s inertia would cause it to wobble and throw off it’s orbit slightly each revolution that has a wobble.


22 posted on 02/08/2008 4:10:32 PM PST by RaceBannon (Innocent until proven guilty; The Pendleton 8: We are not going down without a fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ASOC

I was kinda wondering...LOL


23 posted on 02/08/2008 4:11:11 PM PST by patton (cuiquam in sua arte credendum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CPOSharky

It’s probably disinformation fed the reporter - the better to keep anyone away from it.


24 posted on 02/08/2008 4:11:42 PM PST by maine-iac7 (",,,but you can't fool all of the people all the time" LINCOLN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
Spy satellite to crash in early March

What goes up must come down, however this pesky satellite shouldn't have been so stealthy about it's intentions. ; )

25 posted on 02/08/2008 4:12:26 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: prophetic

If ASOC is right and this thing is in a polar orbit, then — even though the orbit is not random — the location of the landing might as well be considered random.


26 posted on 02/08/2008 4:14:31 PM PST by AZLiberty (President Fred -- I like the sound of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
Short-term exposure to hydrazine could cause coughin, irritated throat and lungs, convulsions, tremors and seizures. Long-term exposure could damage the liver, kidney and reproductive organs.

And "gloooobal waaaarmin" is an issue of focus? ; )

27 posted on 02/08/2008 4:18:02 PM PST by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
Well if it must come down somewhere


28 posted on 02/08/2008 4:27:31 PM PST by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

Call Hillary. She takes one glance at it, and it will bump out of its earthward destination and head to anywhere else.


29 posted on 02/08/2008 4:29:20 PM PST by LurkedLongEnough (Music washes away the dust of every day life. ---Art Blakey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CPOSharky
Agreed. In addition, I doubt very much that the hydrazine will survive the fall. (Or the ozidizer either. Do they still use nitric acid? why didn't the writer make that a problem?)

The hydrazine tanks could potentially survive entry, which could mean that the hydrazine may escape when the tank hits the ground.

The oxidizer (if there is an oxidizer) would be Nitrogen Tetroxide (N2O4) which is also nasty stuff. But lots of satellites don't bother with an oxidizer, they just run hydrazine over a catalyst bed and get propulsion that way. Less fuel efficient, but a whole lot easier.

30 posted on 02/08/2008 4:32:11 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
The satellite has been wandering in orbit in a random path ever since.

Could be anywhere. Maybe it will crash on the moon.

31 posted on 02/08/2008 4:33:31 PM PST by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Exactly what I was thinking. LMAO

Oh, and I'm sure there'll be plenty of debris to go around.

32 posted on 02/08/2008 4:34:28 PM PST by MaxMax (I need a life after politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

Oh-oh-oh-I can’t stop laughing.


33 posted on 02/08/2008 4:35:14 PM PST by pepperdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RaceBannon

Solar wind would push it unevenly, but the thing is fairly heavy so the effect wouldn’t amount to much.


34 posted on 02/08/2008 4:35:45 PM PST by RightWhale (Clam down! avoid ataque de nervosa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

Maybe we could ask the Chinese to test out their satellite killing equipment again.


35 posted on 02/08/2008 4:35:49 PM PST by krb (If you're not outraged, people probably like having you around.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora

if they know exactly when it will de-orbit they could calculate the general area, so as we get closer it’ll get more specific I am sure


36 posted on 02/08/2008 4:37:40 PM PST by GeronL (or maybe I just read too much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Walkingfeather

or even to deorbit them on purpose to open up spots for working sats


37 posted on 02/08/2008 4:38:48 PM PST by GeronL (or maybe I just read too much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

no that would require an enormous amount of fuel, that they don’t have. changing orbits dramatically is very costly


38 posted on 02/08/2008 4:40:26 PM PST by GeronL (or maybe I just read too much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty
It's not just me - honest

The USAF thinks it is in a polar orbit as well....

You can follow it along from this cool site: http://www.n2yo.com/satellite.php?s=29651

How do I know?

Well - the published data shows:
USA 193 can be found in the following categories:
Military
NORAD ID: 29651
Int'l Code: 2006-057A
Perigee: 408 km
Apogee: 421 km
Inclination: 40°
Period: 92.9 min
Launch date: 2006-12-14
Source: United States (US)

Comments: USA 193 is an American military satellite that was launched from Vandenberg AFB at 21:00 UT on 14 December 2006. It is a highly classified spacecraft, owned and operated by the National Reconnaissance Office (NRO). No further details are available. In January 2008, reports emerged that a U.S. spy satellite, again probably this one, was in a deteriorating orbit, and that the object was expected to crash into the Earth within weeks.

Early reports indicated that the satellite could contain "hazardous materials", probably hydrazine, and possibly beryllium,though there was also some speculation that the satellite might have a "nuclear" power core, i.e. a radioisotope thermoelectric generator. Defense consultant John E. Pike dismissed this as "unlikely". (according to Wikipedia)

On January 29, 2008, an Associated Press story quoted a U.S. Air Force general as saying that contingency plans were being made since intact pieces of the satellite "might re-enter into the North American area".

The lazy a$$ reporter could have taken 10 min and added some facts to the story - but that would have been too much. OY!

Most of the launchs from Vandyland are polar orbiting birds

39 posted on 02/08/2008 4:45:40 PM PST by ASOC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

Your last line sounds just like a gaseous emission from Al Gore’s butt would be.

So that’s how global warming works!


40 posted on 02/08/2008 5:01:51 PM PST by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper (Madmax, the Grinning Reaper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson