Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists Measure What It Takes to Push a Single Atom
NY Times ^ | February 22, 2008 | KENNETH CHANG

Posted on 02/23/2008 5:08:00 PM PST by neverdem

I.B.M. scientists have measured the force needed to nudge one atom.

About one-130-millionth of an ounce of force pushes a cobalt atom across a smooth, flat piece of platinum.

Pushing the same atom along a copper surface is easier, just one-1,600-millionth of an ounce of force.

The scientists report these minuscule findings in Friday’s issue of the journal Science.

I.B.M. scientists have been pushing atoms around for some time, since Donald M. Eigler of the company’s Almaden Research Center in San Jose, Calif., spelled “IBM” using 35 xenon atoms in 1989. Since then, researchers at the company have continued to explore how they might be able to construct structures and electronic components out of individual atoms.

Knowing the precise forces required to move atoms “helps us to understand what is possible and what is not possible,” said Andreas J. Heinrich, a physicist at Almaden and an author of the new Science paper. “It’s a stepping stone for us, but it’s by no means the end goal.”

In the experiment, Dr. Heinrich and his collaborators at Almaden and the University of Regensburg in Germany used the sharp tip of an atomic force microscope to push a single atom. To measure the force, the tip was attached to a small tuning fork, the same kind that is found in a quartz wristwatch. In fact, in the first prototype, Franz J. Giessibl, a scientist at Regensburg who was a pioneer in the use of atomic force microscopes, bought an inexpensive watch and pulled out the quartz tuning fork for use in the experiment.

The tip vibrates 20,000 times a second until it comes into contact with an atom. As the tip pushes, the tuning fork bends, like a diving board, and the vibration frequency dips.

A single atom does not roll, and even...

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Technical
KEYWORDS: physics; science
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Jenny Hunter, IBM
An illustration of the tip of an atomic force microscope, in brown, measuring the force it takes to move a cobalt atom, the yellow sphere, on a crystalline surface.

IBM
The tuning fork in the atomic force microscope, which measures the interaction between the tip and the atom.

The Force Needed to Move an Atom on a Surface
1 posted on 02/23/2008 5:08:01 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

a very, very, very small pusher


2 posted on 02/23/2008 5:12:57 PM PST by NonValueAdded (Who Would Montgomery Brewster Choose?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The answer is 3.


3 posted on 02/23/2008 5:15:57 PM PST by Greg F (Do you want a guy named Hussein to fix your soul? Michelle Obama thinks you do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
About one-130-millionth of an ounce of force pushes a cobalt atom across a smooth, flat piece of platinum.

Pushing the same atom along a copper surface is easier, just one-1,600-millionth of an ounce of force.

How about gold, which is more conductive than either metal? Gold should take even less force.

4 posted on 02/23/2008 5:16:21 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Color me jaded, but it seems the days of Boltzmann and Gibbs, when men solved these problems through sheer power of intellect are gone. Nowadays it's just smaller, thinner, lighter, purer, better machined, more highly polished, more collimated, better resolved, higher power, and more generously funded.
5 posted on 02/23/2008 5:28:58 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

The work was done in the Almaden Research Center in San Jose, California.

For those who do not know, IBM started as the Bundy Manufacturing Company in Downtown Binghamton NY at the turn of the century, They then moved to Endicott, 8 miles to the west, at that time a shoe manufacturing mecca. Now the area is uber-gentrified and both Endicott-Johnson and IBM are gone, victims of the irresponsible government of Broome County and the State of New York. It is a d**n shame.


6 posted on 02/23/2008 5:29:32 PM PST by Shady (The Fairness Doctrine is ANYTHING but fair!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Gold is a good conductor of ELECTRONS, as in electric current. Does that mean it’s a good conductor of ATOMS? Good question. I dunno.


7 posted on 02/23/2008 5:32:14 PM PST by zebra 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

these are the same people who insist that man is descendent from apes, fish, and goo, correct?


8 posted on 02/23/2008 5:36:10 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (I can't remember, is this satire or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

it will take them a million years before they understand what it takes for a pregnant woman to give birth.


9 posted on 02/23/2008 5:36:41 PM PST by ari-freedom (Never a dude like this one! Obama's got a plan to stick it to The Man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Isn’t “one-1,600-millionth of an ounce” actually one-1.6 billionth of an ounce?

Can’t these scientists count?


10 posted on 02/23/2008 5:39:57 PM PST by 4Liberty (U.S. Income Tax laws are enforced... but Immigration laws aren’t = global tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zebra 2
Gold is a good conductor of ELECTRONS, as in electric current. Does that mean it’s a good conductor of ATOMS? Good question. I dunno.

I don't either, I was making a wild guess, based on the shaky idea that there may some similarities.

11 posted on 02/23/2008 5:45:34 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty

Did it cross your mind that it might be the NYT with the problem, not the scientists?


12 posted on 02/23/2008 5:49:16 PM PST by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

What’s your point?


13 posted on 02/23/2008 5:49:38 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; Alamo-Girl; betty boop
Pushing an atom?... Science does not even know what an atom is...
Einstein worked with things too big to visualize or even calulate in the Universe and Niels Bohr (Quantum Physics) delt with things much too small to visualize or calulate..

What an atom "is", and What life "is", are blank spaces to science.. Pushing an atom is not pushing little balls revolving around each other.. Thats a mythical construct..

And the earth does "seem" flat from several perpectives..
Dead DNA appears exactly like live DNA...
So many mysterys.. so much that takes "faith".. for humans..

14 posted on 02/23/2008 6:05:30 PM PST by hosepipe (CAUTION: This propaganda is laced with hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
A single atom does not roll

Even a single atom will roll when Obama becomes POTUS. Obama will also end Brownian Motion by reaching to every particle and nudging it in the correct direction.
15 posted on 02/23/2008 6:17:41 PM PST by alecqss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Greg F

To my knowledge, the answer is 42.

I guess we’re asking different questions.

:-)


16 posted on 02/23/2008 6:27:02 PM PST by TrueKnightGalahad (When you're racing...it's life. Anything that happens before or after is just waiting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

they’ve been wrong before.


17 posted on 02/23/2008 6:31:05 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (I can't remember, is this satire or not?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
they’ve been wrong before.

And they don't have the correct answer now, of that I'm 100% sure, so what?

As our understanding of these things increases, other scientists will say "how on earth could they not understood this or that". And then they will adjust the calculations to reflect the most current state of human knowledge. So what? That's how progress is made. That's how we developed the first atomic bomb.

Rather than come to mock them, why didn't you put in your estimate of how much energy it took?

I suspect it's because you don't know enough to even make a guess. So you are reduced to acting like a screaming monkey, jumping up and down and and shouting "they're wrong! They're wrong".

18 posted on 02/23/2008 7:00:54 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (If America falls, darkness will cover the face of the earth for a thousand years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
I suspect it's because you don't know enough to even make a guess. So you are reduced to acting like a screaming monkey, jumping up and down and and shouting "they're wrong! They're wrong".

Maybe you should lay off the halucanogenics. To wit, where did I say anything remotely like that? Because I used the word "wrong" in a sentence, you transalate it that way?

The damndest thing about trying to communicate is the absolute gamut of misconceptions that people who probably watch wayyy too much TV misread into the simplest statements.

19 posted on 02/23/2008 7:06:05 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (the model prescribes the required behavior. disincentives ensure compliance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
Color me jaded, but it seems the days of Boltzmann and Gibbs, when men solved these problems through sheer power of intellect are gone. Nowadays it's just smaller, thinner, lighter, purer, better machined, more highly polished, more collimated, better resolved, higher power, and more generously funded.

The fundamental breakthroughs come from intellect and a bit of luck. Who knows when some everyday event will trigger a thought in a scientists mind that takes him/her down a revolutionary scientific path.

20 posted on 02/23/2008 7:20:28 PM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson