Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Texas court: State can take sect children to foster homes
The Daily Iowan ^ | 4/25/08 | N/A

Posted on 04/25/2008 6:36:20 AM PDT by MizSterious

Texas court: State can take sect children to foster homes

By: Associated Press

Posted: 4/25/08

SAN ANGELO, Texas (AP) - Dozens of mothers from a polygamist retreat were bused away from their children Thursday, their legal efforts to stay united rejected as Texas officials sort out their massive custody case.

Two buses took the women from the San Angelo Coliseum, where they had been temporarily housed with their children. Texas officials were preparing to move the last of more than 400 children to group homes, shelters and residences, some hundreds of miles away, over the next few days.

One woman held a handwritten sign out the bus window that read: "SOS. Mothers separated. Help."

"There are no words to describe how it was," said Velvet, a mother who was forced to leave her 13-month old. She and other sect women have refused to give their last names, fearing it will affect their custody cases.

"We've been staying up nights to watch over the children because we didn't know what would happen," she said in a news conference outside the ranch gates Thursday.

In Austin, the state's 3rd Court of Appeals rejected the mothers' pleas to immediately stop authorities from busing the children taken from the ranch to foster homes.

The court agreed to hear arguments Tuesday, but attorney Robert Doggett, who represents 48 mothers, said that "having a hearing after the fact" was pointless.


(Excerpt) Read more at dailyiowan.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: allyourkids; arebelong2government; court; dailythread; flda; flds; fldsdailythread; govtabuse; sanangelo; yfz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-210 next last
To: Tammy8
"This was a very drastic action, no question about it, and it is startling to us when our government makes a big move like that."

Yes, it was. And it was gut-wrenching, watching the separations. I have to admit I had many misgivings until some of the facts started coming out, most particularly about the validity of the warrants. To me, that's the main thing: are the warrants valid, and was this done lawfully. I believe (based on opinions expressed by people who know lots more about the law than I do) that it was all on the up and up, at least so far. It has yet to go to court, actually probably at least two courts, family court and possibly criminal court depending on the evidence, so we'll see how it goes.

People who say children should "never" be removed from a home have no idea what evil they would unleash if they got their wish. Sometimes removal is the only thing that can save their lives. Given the waterboarding-type torture this group uses to "break" babies of crying, I would say that it's possible that's the case here, too.

81 posted on 04/25/2008 10:17:30 AM PDT by MizSterious (The Republican Party is infected with the RINO-virus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Sidebar Moderator; deport; MizSterious
I have suggested to Miz that she add "fldsdailythread" to the keywords, Today's and yesterday's threads are so marked. Also, With the title changing every day, a permanent link isn't possible, but I have a permanent link to the keyword "fldsdailythread" page that works nicely. I can hit that link and the daily threads are all nicely arranged on the page. Good for checking back often.

BTW, for anyone searching for specifically FLDS threads, I have tried to insert the keyword flds on each thread I have seen in the past three weeks or so. I know I missed some, but most of them should be there.

If anyone posting to a thread that doesn't include that keyword would add it, that would be nice.

Thanks.

Thanks, moderator for your help.

82 posted on 04/25/2008 10:22:20 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Are there any WOMEN FReepers who agree that the 1st. Amendment OKs sexual slavery?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
The hearing at the 14 day mark was to have supposed to been the “individual hearings”. What occurred was some kind of mass trial. If no parents show up when the particular child's case is called then the court can move forward without them. If someone shows up claiming to be a parent the court can make inquiry to have them give some proof of the claim. It does not matter that this process would have taken lot's of time it's what I believe the law requires.
Some of the attorneys representing the children did object to the procedure. Remember these are are attorney's representing the child (’s best interest) not parents interest or the state's.
83 posted on 04/25/2008 10:27:28 AM PDT by nomorelurker (keep flogging them till morale improves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom; TheDon
You are destroying the format of every thread on which you post your spam.

The picture doesn't make any sense, anyway...and at least it could be modified to a smaller size. However, it really IS spam!

84 posted on 04/25/2008 10:27:39 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Are there any WOMEN FReepers who agree that the 1st. Amendment OKs sexual slavery?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious
Each child currently is represented by his or her own lawyer

I'm sure that's a great comfort to the children. I'm sure the lawyers are just all as pleased as punch that there is no room on any docket for their individual case in the forseeable future, and when their individual custody case eventually does get a chance to be heard, it will be long after the fact. Who knows? Maybe they can get more billable hours that way. Who cares? It is an industry, after all. No one bats an eye.

...and it will be sorted out.

When? After the trauma to the innocent has already been multiplied many times over?

Cordially,

85 posted on 04/25/2008 10:30:31 AM PDT by Diamond
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
I think the issue is the fact that the mothers are refusing to say who is the natural mother of which child.

That is a great point, and I think that had more to do with the way this was handled than anything. I am not sure that the women and children don't know- a friend of mine that lives near Colorado City told me that the polymagists have a practice of keeping secret who parents and children are and that children are told when they think they are old enough to keep the secret. The little ones may not know but the older ones likely do. Of course I guess it is possible after doing this for a while they may have actually lost track.

I once recieved a visit from CPS at my home when my daughter was going through a messy divorce- I am really sure if we had all played games with the investigator as to who my grandson and his mother were and how we were all related to him- he would have been removed. You just can't use subterfuge with authorities and expect the best results.

We were candid with the investigator and I even stood up to him on one issue- when I truthfully told him we did have guns in our home in response to him asking- he wanted to see how we had them stored, and I told him no he could not. I did ask him how to store them around children in a way our state would approve of and he told me. I thought he might get heavy handed over that- but he didn't. It was all quite professional and we never heard from them again.

I do at times question how much power CPS has, which is normal in a free society- but I don't know how they could protect children if they didn't have a lot of power. I have heard of abuses of that power but there are bad apples in every bunch.

86 posted on 04/25/2008 10:33:07 AM PDT by Tammy8 (Please Support and pray for our Troops, as they serve us every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Y2000

If I EVER get dumb enough to “groom” my 13 year old girls to marry “older” men....please,.please.....come over yourself and slap me upside the head.


87 posted on 04/25/2008 10:35:48 AM PDT by HappyinAZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: HappyinAZ

BTTT


88 posted on 04/25/2008 11:20:51 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Are there any WOMEN FReepers who agree that the 1st. Amendment OKs sexual slavery?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Y2000
"I wish GOVERNMENT authorities take your childern (if you have any...)away from you."

They did, at my divorce, along with my wallet and a lung. By that didn't make me hate Texas, or women, or children, or even my ex really. And it certainly didn't make me want to give child rapists a pass.

What did they take from you to make you the way you are?

89 posted on 04/25/2008 11:28:50 AM PDT by Enosh (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39

I just heard Dr. Michael Baden (forensic expert) on Fox News. He said the DNA from the mother will determine which children are hers. (Microchrondial?) That test takes a couple of months. The father’s DNA can also be determined via a different test which doesn’t take as long, and the testing can determine incestual relationships.

He also pointed out that the age of the girls can be determined by bone x-rays.


90 posted on 04/25/2008 11:35:43 AM PDT by rightazrain (Stop Obama/Clinton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8; MizSterious; Politicalmom; metmom; colorcountry
I am not clear in my own mind about the way this was all handled and I think most of my questions will be answered as this plays out. This was a very drastic action, no question about it, and it is startling to us when our government makes a big move like that. I don't know enough about the law or the facts of the case to know whether anything was done wrong or not- but it is a concern of mine and should be at least in everyone's mind a little unsettling.

Well-reasoned and articulate post overall. I don't agree with everything you have posted on various threads, but this is a keeper, IMO. Thanks

91 posted on 04/25/2008 11:44:06 AM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Are there any WOMEN FReepers who agree that the 1st. Amendment OKs sexual slavery?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: rightazrain

If they don’t know who the mother is, then it would seem to be much more difficult to match up the parents and children- not using the mother means they have to start with the child and compare all other DNA- I guess. Did he say anything about how this works with no verified mother either?

I was also wondering if there was a medical way to verify ages- did he say how close they can get with this method? Can they nail down the exact age I wonder or just a range of ages.


92 posted on 04/25/2008 11:52:41 AM PDT by Tammy8 (Please Support and pray for our Troops, as they serve us every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: greyfoxx39; Tammy8

Thanks for alerting me to this post. I agree with much of the sentiment.

IMHO most at FR have some concerns about the way this is playing out, and all of us (I hope) have grave concerns about the allegations in this case, and the history of this sect.

There is more middle ground here than many of us are willing to concede.


93 posted on 04/25/2008 11:54:27 AM PDT by colorcountry (To anger a conservative, lie to him. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: killermedic

Here, perhaps you would take the word of the women who actually lived there, and were raped.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2006719/posts


94 posted on 04/25/2008 12:10:17 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (I reserve the right to misinterpret the comments of any and all posters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8

Tammy, I assume they will match the children to the women they have gotten DNA from. Same for the men. If there is not a match, it means the natural mother or father didn’t come forward for any range of reasons.

He didn’t get into the details other than to say bone x-rays can determine the age of children. (I assume a close approximation depending on pediatric bone development, but I didn’t catch how close to actual age. He talked about it like it would be pretty determinative, at least that was my impression.


95 posted on 04/25/2008 12:11:33 PM PDT by rightazrain (Stop Obama/Clinton!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner
No offense, dude, but you obviously have not been keeping up with what has been going on in this compound or what the real moral and legal issues are with regard to this polygamist sect.

Probably not aware as I do not watch TV. Dont really trust it. Especially since WACO.

I hope people are not miscontruing what I am saying. I certainly dont support underage fornication or marriage. Certainly if people are being forced into relationships or just sex then it of course is wrong and illegal. Ultimately the state is treading on dangerous ground when via a bogus phone call they storm a compund. The Same thing was done in WACO. I was only pointing out that teens who have sex willingly are not really abused they are not raped even though the state likes to define it as Statutory rape.

It makes me very worried that the state has the power to take children then say an anonymous phone call is what spurred them into action. From what I understand no grand Jury was assembled to investigate if a crime had been committed was there?

I for example am a Baptist Fundamentalist and we for example believe in spanking our children if they misbehave. But you better not let DFACS in Georgia find that out, because they will take your children claiming abuse. You better not spank in public either. The State has very dangerous powers and I fear that if the children especially the young ones are taken from their mother it may do more harm than good.

96 posted on 04/25/2008 12:34:07 PM PDT by ColdSteelTalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Maybe you should ask Carolyn Jessop. Or the Judge who has seen the evidence, the affidavits, and heard testimony.

Was a grand jury formed???

97 posted on 04/25/2008 12:35:01 PM PDT by ColdSteelTalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom

That’s a picture of the judge fishing for some criminals! I think it a fitting theme picture for the FLDS affair.


98 posted on 04/25/2008 12:37:08 PM PDT by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Y2000
U.S. atleast one of it's state TEXAS is Nazi state.

++

How about we give it back to Mexico.

99 posted on 04/25/2008 12:37:34 PM PDT by fproy2222 ( Jesus is the Christ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TheDon

I don’t care. It’s ruining the formatting AND it’s spam.

Spam is not allowed.


100 posted on 04/25/2008 12:41:28 PM PDT by Politicalmom (The children were taken because they were either being raised to be raped, or raised to be a rapist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-210 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson