Skip to comments.Megan Kelly dimsantling US Weekly Editor
Posted on 09/03/2008 2:56:51 PM PDT by tpanther
Just saw it, she is one heck of a woman.
How about a little more info?
Where? When? How? Number of body parts?
She was really trashing that waste of oxygen.
What a little twit. I felt like punching out my TV.
Just saw the weasel. He could not justify the article other than to tell people to read it. Why would anyone want to buy that trash and read it?
They are so busted.
I really like her.
Come on, please share some details!
Man1 What a slithery liar that guy was!
Megan asked him questions about what was in the article, and then pointed out that both sides were NOT there.
Meg is getting more and more fired up as this goes on. Yesterday, she almost blew a gasket on someone, too.
She wiped the mat with that smirky little putz. He however probably succeeded in doubling their sales.
Body parts not identifiable. The little bastard is just a stain now.
I saw it.
She tore him and his story apart.
Did I mention, SHE’S HOT!!!!
Just saw it. Megan was great!!
That US Editor was such a weasel. On “troopergate” he said they didn’t have time to investigate the charges against the trooper. What? They could have googled it in 2 minutes and obtained the list.
And the cover word “LIES” he said referred to the lies people were telling about Palin. Riight. Anyone seeing the cover would think the lies referred to something Palin did.
She made him look like an idiot. Makes you wonder what his readers are like.
I just saw that too. She actually accused him of lying about what he wrote in the article. Good girl!
GREAT JOB MEGAN!!!!!
Wow, he was destroyed!
I will never pick up that magazine again!
That was a good interview.
Too bad she had to cut it short. That is the problem with FoxNews — they cut short good interviews to return to the repetitive news alerts.
She was magnificant on O’Reilly yesterday defending Palin and mother’s that work. Wow!
This idiot would have people believe that the title “sex, lies... blah blah blah...were REALLY the lies from the left wing bloggers lying about the 17 year old having Trig!
She also asks did you bother to mention that the DUI was 22 years ago?
He said ‘of course’ she said ‘NOOOOO you did not!’
I haven’t read US in my entire life and I’m not about to start now, but this interview to allow these idiots to straighten things out...
I saw the interview. That SOB twit editor should be slapped with a libel suit by the Palin family.
Anybody can write anything today, even totally made up false stories, with virtual impunity.
Every time the editor would try to lie to her, she’d call him on it. He didn’t handle it well. She really called him on the carpet about things like how the magazine failed to mention that Todd Palin’s DUI was 22 years ago, even though the editor claimed they did mention it. Meg rocks!
Megan had the article in one hand and a broadsword in the other. Parts were flying, lies were dying.
I watched it. It was good and I too wanted to punch him. He was so smug. Unfortunately, they’ll sell a lot of magazines and it will all be for naught and this creep will get a big bonus out of it. I wish we could go to the stores that sell it and rip up all the issues so noone could buuy them.
Megyn pointed out that they never went into detail on what her brother-in-law had done to his step-son, the threats or anything. All they reported on were the allegations against her. There was another issue in the segment I saw but don’t recall what it was. In both cases, the prissy boy stated it was a “balanced” article in which they did not have room for all the details. Naturally, the details they left out were favorable to Sarah Palin.
The prissy boy could only say “read the article”, “read the article”. Smarmy, elusive, and way in over his head with Megyn Kelly.
Darn..missed it! Megyn has been full of righteous anger since yesterday! She ROCKS!! If you find a clip...please ping me.
Didn’t get to see it. I hope someone youtubes it.
I couldn't immediately find Bradley Jacobs' email address on the magazine's website, but I'm guessing - based on the other email addresses listed in the media kit - it would be firstname.lastname@example.org.
A Google search of the guessed email address suggests that it is valid. Haven't emailed him, yet.
It's a guess, but that's all I have to go on.
Megyn has been excellent the last few days on the Palin issue. I’ve always liked her.
I was whooopin’ out loud after that segment. GO MEGAN. She took that bastard out behind the woodshed.
She went point by point through the things the article claimed, starting with the title: ‘ Babies Lies & Scandal’\by asking “What Lies?”..He tyried to play it off like the lies they were talking about, were the ones the Left Wing Hate Sites had been slinging over the weekend...to which, the next question was, Where on the cover does it give any indication that the lies were not Palins?...it got even more direct, as the body of the story was questioned. The Us editor, tried to play it off like it was a balanced article, but it was pointed out that many of the slanders were not given any rebuttal space from Palins defenders.
She tore his flimsy defense of the smear piece to shreds. >B-)
No kidding! Between Megyn and the other woman attorney (sorry, can't recall her name), Bill couldn't get a word in edgewise and when they stopped talking at the end, he was just sitting there, speechless. It was hilarious.
At the convention, about 5 minutes ago, by throwing his trash journalism back in his face and refusing to accept his BS answers, many many parts smeared all over the set. Hope that helps. AWB
Definitely not guilty.