Posted on 09/06/2008 12:36:51 PM PDT by CaraM
There was no Hillary era. WTF?
A thought only a bucket of water would bring the Hillary erea to an ened.
For DUmmies, there was.
Unlike Obama, though, she may be smart enough to know it. I said may be. Obama's so dumb he didn't even see it coming.
Anyone wanna buy some used styrofoam columns? Heh heh.
“I thought only a bucket of water would bring the Hillary era to an end”
LOL
Hide the ashtrays!!!
The new school marm is taking the ‘RATS to school and they can’t handle it. LOL!!!! Go get ‘em Sarah!!! America has your back!!!!!!
Well, Hillary was the most recognized female politician for years.
Palin is much smarter and politically savvy than Clinton.
Further, she has the people skills to lead.
The story in Atlantic really showed how HRC has very poor leadership skills. She blamed her people for everything, and made very bad decisions.
I won’t even get into comparing them morally and ethically.
There is simply no comparison of HRC to Palin.
Oh man, and this is coming out of the UK.
LOL! I thought they were still living in the "President Gore" era. They have a tough time letting things go.
I am almost ready to take back a few of the nasty things I’ve said about the British media over the years.
Almost.
LOL. That’s what I thought when I saw the headline, what was the “Hillary Era”???? It was more of a “Clintonista Era” driven by Bill Clinton’s political abilities coupled with epic dishonesty, narcissism, ruthlessness, etc.
Yes, let’s hope that the Clintonista Era is dead and buried, but now we are confronted by the prospect of the Chicago Gang Era of a “Manchurian Candidate” trying to slip into the WH by lying about his real beliefs and associations, a glib, naive frontman for a cynical gang of Chicagoland left-wing politicians.
Let’s make certain that the Clintonista Era is not replaced by the Obamanation Era. How about a “Palin Era” for 12-16 years?!!?
I'm surprised how many positive comments come out of the UK.
There was one deadly weakness in hillary’s situation. She gained power by being married to someone who became president.
Bring Sarah Palin on the scene, and it becomes glaringly obvious what the difference is between marrying into power and privilege and earning your own way through leadership abilities.
They are both strong women: hillary because she’ll kill you if you cross her, Sarah because she is a natural born leader who enjoys doing the right thing.
Name a single Hillary accomplishment. The writer didn’t, and couldn’t and wouldn’t ever be able to come up with one. Because there aren’t any.
So instead, let’s all just talk about a “Hillary era”, a phrase that’s every bit as empty and meaningless as Hillary’s long and pointless “career”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.