Posted on 09/18/2008 10:59:00 AM PDT by Berlin_Freeper
The return of the Fairness Doctrine continues to be invoked as an argument against giving Democrats more control of the government.
In an op-ed in The Washington Post Thursday, conservative columnist George Will warned that "unless [Sen. John] McCain [R-Ariz.] is president, the government will reinstate the … misnamed Fairness Doctrine."
The doctrine, which was pronounced unconstitutional by the Federal Communications Commission in 1987, required broadcasters to cover both sides of controversial issues. Its decline was matched by the rise of rough-and-tumble political talk radio and the vast majority conservative, led by Rush Limbaugh.
Will sees that format threatened by a Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) administration teamed with a Democratic-controlled Congress, arguing instead for the benefits of divided government. "Liberals, not satisfied with their domination of academia, Hollywood and most of the mainstream media, want to kill talk radio, where liberals have been unable to dent conservative dominance," he wrote.
Obama, via his press secretary, told B&C in June that the candidate does not support reinstituting the Fairness Doctrine and sees the issue as "a distraction from the conversation we should be having about opening up the airwaves and modern communications to as many diverse viewpoints as possible."
But more recently, a campaign surrogate told a C-SPAN TV audience Obama had not taken a position on the doctrine.
(Excerpt) Read more at broadcastingcable.com ...
He's so desperate he's telling his true believers to get in their neighobors' faces about what racists they are if they don't vote for The One.
That's better than any thousand attack ads McPalin could run.
I get infuriated at the Orwellian term “Fairness Doctrine.”
It is the the “Republican/Conservative/Independent/Libertarian Free Speech Thug Cessation by Marxists Doctrine”
wouldn’t it be something if the evening news had to give conservative balance to their leftist talking points?
Amen. Let Bambi go negative and just keep putting a microphone in front of Biden.
The looney left is making McCain’s ads for him!
LOL
VRWC would need to set up offshore internet “pirate” sources to overcome this. How far off the coast would Rush need to get to be outside the jurisdiction of Baraq?
Sort of like Google’s “data barges”
It should be called the Unfairness Doctrine.
We’ve had a taste of freedom. We’re not going to let it be taken away again.
Of course he will try to reimpose the Fairness Doctrine to silence anyone who doesn’t agree with him. If you don’t believe the Democratic Party leaders on their desire to impose it all you need to do is listen to his comments about how voters are listening to bad sources of information and the two attacks he directed his followers to make against WGN when they had guests that he didn’t like. The two attacks are cyber versions of the tactics used by the Brown Shirts prior to taking power and by Woodrow Wilson’s people when he was in power. I wouldn’t be surprised to see the Democrats and Barack Obama try to install the systems that Woodrow Wilson wanted in WWI to prevent opposition to his programs.
So how many conservatives anchors would be added to the alphabet networks readings of the nightly news?
Don’t blame this on George Orwell. Call it what it is, Stalinist. George Orwell’s books were a crticism of Stalinists in the US and UK.
If the “Fairnes Doctrine” is ever reinstituted in the future, its a guarantee that the battle will be settled in the federal courts. Maybe even reaching the SCOTUS. Call it what it is. The FD is an unconstitutional, anti-free speech political tool of the leftwing.
“It should be called the Unfairness Doctrine.”
Why? Are you not aware that freedom is slavery.
My newspeak is double-plus good.
“It should be called the Unfairness Doctrine.”
Why? Are you not aware that freedom is slavery.
My newspeak is double-plus good.
You have to figure every law the government proposes is the reverse of whatever it's named. The government could propose "Apple Pie Day" and I'd figure it was really "Cow Pie Day".
The airwaves are already ‘open’.
It’s just that Marxism doesn’t sell. So laws must be passed to cram it down our throats.
We could demand Rush Limbaugh be given air time ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, NPR etc....
wouldn’t it be something if the evening news had to give conservative balance to their leftist talking points?_____________________________
But that’s just it; The Fairness Doctrine would never be applied to the MSM. Afterall they don’t editorialize the news, they report it.
Folks, if Obama get’s in; prepare for The Fairness Doctrine.
YES!
But the drive-by media will insist that they are journalists who by definition are objective, thus the fairness doctrine does not apply to them.
That they can say this with a straight face is beyond me.
Based on three execution-type murders who were members of Barry’s church, and a detractor who was “disappeared” by the Delaware AG following a news conference, we have a LOT more to worry about than the Fairness Doctrine. No accusations, but the facts have been obfuscated.
First off, I give Øbama ZERO chance at winning, so I’ll answer the question using an alternate universe with Øbama as President.
The outrage would be nothing like we’ve ever seen before and Øbama would be seen as a fascist extremist.
Will Rush Limbaugh be co-hosting the news with Katie Couric, or will this only apply to “right wing” speech.
Enacting this would DESTROY the democrat party with the exception of the far, far, far left, reducing them to the fringe party they deserve to be.
He’s so desperate he’s telling his true believers to get in their neighobors’ faces about what racists they are if they don’t vote for The One.
_________________
Video of Øbama telling people to “get in their face” will make a crushing ad against his whole B.S. about the post-partisan, bring us together campaign.
Bring us together? You mean bring us to blows.
Obama supporters who want to get in my face can get in the back of the line of 9/11 truthers who I would like to get in my face first. lol
Second it!
If somehow the 'Fairness Doctrine' was instated at some point, then Conservatives & Republicans could invoke fairness in Big Media News Outlets, both in print and television.
We could demand Rush Limbaugh be given air time ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, NPR etc....
We could demand it, yes - but who would broadcast our demand? NBC?The reality is that if the Fairness Doctrine were reinstated, the EIB would go to satellite radio (as well as the Internet, presumably. And AM broadcast would probably die.
It is surreal that PBS and NPR are funded by taxpayers; every network, magazine, newspaper and college, save a few, are all Left Wing and they want more “balance”?
The oppose e-verify, too.
At what point do we re-take this country back?
Per the Wall Street Journal September 11, 2008, “Obama’s Lost Years,” Obama graduated from Columbia University (to which he transferred after his first two years at Occidental College in California), with a degree in Political Science without honors, so had a GPA less than a 3.3, and perhaps far, far lower, perhaps even in the 2.0, C range. His roomate Sohale Siddiqi indicated Obama itially felt alienated, felt “very lost,” and used drugs to get high, which could have led to very low grades initially. The roomate indicates that he then turned serious and “stopped getting high.” Obama transferred to Columbia because “I was concerned with urban issues and I wanted to be around more black folks in big cities.” Based on his less-than 3.3 GPA, it seems likely his admission to Harvard Law School was based not on his own merit, but rather on Affirmative Action. Obama through September 11, 2008 has continued to refuse to release his Columbia transcript with the exact course details and GPA.....As an Affirmative Action student, he feels he needs to ‘get back’ at those he made him one. ?????
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.