Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Livid in Ohio (Hillary Clinton Forum)
http://www.hillaryclintonforum.net/discussion/showthread.php?t=40477 ^ | 4 Nov 2008 | Jayling at Hillary Clinton Forum

Posted on 11/04/2008 3:55:28 PM PST by Blogger

Interesting discussion of how Ms Brunner structured the touch screens in Northern Ohio. We have to get rid of this bag!

Includes pictures of the actual computer screens.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: Ohio
KEYWORDS: ohio; puma; pumas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
No problems voting this morning in SW Ohio.
1 posted on 11/04/2008 3:55:30 PM PST by Blogger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Blogger
McCain-Palin buried on PAGE 2 of the selections:

Socialist Party was top ranked. Makes sense.

2 posted on 11/04/2008 3:59:30 PM PST by weegee (Fight Global Socialist CHANGE. vote NO on Obama-Biden. Say NO to Sen. Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

What was the problem with the screens? They seemed clear enough to me.


3 posted on 11/04/2008 4:00:08 PM PST by null and void (This isn't an election, it's a manifestation of a Salvador Dali painting. [Persistence of Division])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

McCain wasn’t listed until the second page or screen.


4 posted on 11/04/2008 4:03:11 PM PST by tsmith130
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: null and void

The problem is that it’s clearly designed with a partisna end in mind. McCain-Palin is buried on page 2, while Obama and Barr adn Baldwin are all on page 1. This is a clear effort to make it difficult for Ohio voters to vote for McCain.

Not that Brunner will allow all the votes to be counted anyway.


5 posted on 11/04/2008 4:04:56 PM PST by TBP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

The fact that the Socialist candidate tops the list says it all


6 posted on 11/04/2008 4:05:54 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

The order candidates names appear on the ballot is scrambled, as it was found being at the top of the ballot gives a statistical advantage to a candidate (Stupid Voter Alert!)


7 posted on 11/04/2008 4:06:04 PM PST by null and void (This isn't an election, it's a manifestation of a Salvador Dali painting. [Persistence of Division])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

The “Sisterhood of the Traveling Pantsuits” will have their say!


8 posted on 11/04/2008 4:06:16 PM PST by Don Corleone (Leave the gun..take the cannoli)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

Here in Ohio, I’ve been listening to Ohio radio all day and the order of candidates on the electronic screens is reported to vary from county to county. One caller said McCain was at the top of his.


9 posted on 11/04/2008 4:08:12 PM PST by Rudder (The Main Stream Media is Our Enemy---get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Dh and I figured out that if you went with the regular screen size and not the large print that McCain was listed first but if you hit the large print button like I did to make the writting larger, Obama came first. Really weird but the way our machines in SE Ohio were set up.


10 posted on 11/04/2008 4:09:49 PM PST by chris_bdba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: null and void; Blogger

Clear enough to most of us, but the computer illiterate may not find McCain, by paging forward, and may not bother to ask, especially if the helpers are busy or hostile. I do think it’s weird not to find the top 2 candidates first or the candidates listed alphabetically by name or party. It almost seems like a ‘bury him at the bottom’ tactic, even if most catch it.


11 posted on 11/04/2008 4:10:24 PM PST by fortunecookie (Robin Hood is a legitimate hero, because he returned to the poor what lawfully belonged to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

That sort of thing only works with Democrats. Jenny’s projecting again.


12 posted on 11/04/2008 4:13:44 PM PST by Baladas ((ABBHO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

How do they tell the difference between the Socialists and the Dems?


13 posted on 11/04/2008 4:14:10 PM PST by nufsed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: null and void

I think his beef is that the two front runners aren’t listed on the first screen.


14 posted on 11/04/2008 4:14:37 PM PST by arderkrag (Libertarian Nutcase (Political Compass Coordinates: 9.00, -2.62 - www.politicalcompass.org))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TBP

Another “accidentally” intentional touch of deception. The Obama/Biden ticket is listed as Democratic, not Democrat.


15 posted on 11/04/2008 4:14:44 PM PST by Phil Lers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

Ballot position is usually done by lottery or alphabetically.


16 posted on 11/04/2008 4:15:51 PM PST by smokingfrog ( God doesn't wear a wristwatch.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

Dayton area/ Montgomery County - McCain/Palin on first page there but I did not go for the large print. Frankly I would search through 10,000 screens to find them if I had to.


17 posted on 11/04/2008 4:17:28 PM PST by Faith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

I talked to a buddy in an upscale neighborhood near Dayton, he said there were only 3 machines with over 200 people waiting to vote.. Would be interesting to know how the machine allocations were done...


18 posted on 11/04/2008 4:18:25 PM PST by flash2368 (Scary times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blogger

The Paper Ballots were the same way here in brown county Socialist Party first and Mccain/Palin buried on the back of the First page ...


19 posted on 11/04/2008 4:21:01 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK (Drag The Waters some more like never before !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flash2368
...he said there were only 3 machines with over 200 people waiting to vote..

Not sure what my regular voting place was like today, but when I voted early last week there must have been 30 voting machines set up. Two were in use at the time I went there. Agree with your speculation about allocation, though.

20 posted on 11/04/2008 4:25:32 PM PST by ken in texas (come fold with us - team #36120)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson