Posted on 11/13/2008 12:23:40 AM PST by bd476
“the tolerant demonstrate intolerance”
Regarding the “tolerance” issue and homosexuals. I never witnessed first-hand how completely INtolerant they are. On a TV show, “Sell This House”, one couple was lesbian. They had the freakiest house ever. I mean, it was AWFUL. At the beginning of the show, prospective buyers do walk-throughs, and a hidden camera tapes their comments, and these comments were honest and not positive at all.
Usually, the selling couple says, “Well, my feelings are a little hurt, but I understand what they’re saying, and... whatever it takes to sell the place we’ll do.” Not this couple, though. Every comment was personal. “Well! I’d like to see THEIR house!” “This is still my house and I’m not going to change that!” Blah blah blah. There was no tolerance; it was all about them. Everyone was wrong — the people who commented about the pool table in the living room, walls painted to look dirty, a bazillion teddy bears piled in the entry, etc. The dominant one was angry and offended at even the smallest negative comment. It was in your face, and the concept that other people have different tastes wasn’t even considered. Basically, they wanted to force their disgusting decor on the world.
The host tried to remind them that their goal was to sell the house so the Bubba one could move and start her new job. Still, she wasn’t willing to make some of the changes. I didn’t get it.
Deny them our children and they get pithy.
This election had NOTHING to do about two gay people getting together for life. It had EVERYTHING to do with the current spate of pro-gay indoctrination in schools.
Jeez, old gray angry fagguy, pick on someone your own size. I wonder if he pitches or catches? Then they showed him stomping on the cross, classy act. That idiot will be out there again in the daily demonstrations, and maybe he needs to see more crosses. Like all good vampires.
Reminds me of the Leprechaun. Always throwing in the "both sides" comment even when something is clearly one-sided.
http://laist.com/2008/11/07/2_protesters_sent_to_hospital_after.php
"A fight that broke out between opponents and proponents of Prop 8, the November 4th ballot initiative that sought to ban gay marriage in California, ended with two people apparently being sent to the hospital. Leah Murphy of Westwood said she was walking with a group of ten friends at Thursday's protest outside the Mormon Temple on Santa Monica Blvd. when two women who were said to have come from within church grounds began to call them derogatory names.
Both sides argued with each other before one woman apparently lashed out at a protester by punching her in the face shortly before 6 p.m. Soon, four protesters from the the group of friends were hurt in the altercation which soon involved five men who allegedly came from behind the church gates.
Two of the women were sent to the hospital and the other two were treated for their wounds, according to Murphy. The Los Angeles Fire Department could not immediately pull up records due to the sheer volume of hospital transports a day--500 on an average day--but Officer Jason Lee of the LAPD said "there were allegations of some battery" when asked about two women being sent to the hospital."
More evidence of "both sides"...
http://www.latimes.com/video/?slug=la-me-protest7-2008nov07-vid
I repeat again, why isn’t Romney in Calif. defending his Church and other people’s religious views? His Mormon Church is directly under attack, and that’s when leaders show up. Mitt, buy a plane ticket already.
send these CLOWNS to my neck of the woods
Time for some Homo beat down, IMO.
I'm surprised the gay old guy's head didn't spin 360 and spew vomit.
.
bttt
In a little over a week, many Californians and Americans are being subjected to Hate Crimes committed by criminal gay deviates.
We don’t march and threaten gays with axes, axe handles, ball bats and other weapons, as done by Hate Filled Gays in a church as shown in the picture linked below:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2129679/posts?page=1#1
More hate crimes committed by hostile Gay deviates:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jiwc9ybBiAw&feature=related
Vandals Target Mormon Church In Orangevale:
http://cbs13.com/local/Vandals.Strike.Orangevale.2.859342.html
Nor do we threaten elderly gays and rip their rainbows away from them. However gays committed this hate crime against an elderly Christian woman as shown in the link below. There will be a short bumper ad before it starts:
http://gatorgop.blogspot.com/2008/11/crazy-lefties-attack-old-lady-at-no-on.html
We can boycott the corporations funding the repeal of Prop 8.
There are many corporations funding the repeal of Prop 8.
This link takes us right to the corporate sponsor page to repel Prop 8:
http://laglc.convio.net/site/PageServer?pagename=SU_CORPORATIONS
Boycotts can work for our side too.
despicable
The same thing that happened in Kenya when Odinga lost.
‘Hate’ crime territory, imo
Book ‘em, Dan-o.
My wife watches House Hunters but I am not really interested in it. Once in a while I’ll see some of it but when I see homos doing the buying I definitely lose interest. Does this make me intolerant? Then so be it.
What? The tinkerbells guilty of hate? Surely, you jest! To hear them tell it, it seems that being queer makes one immune to hating. Oh,they just all the models of perfection(gag!). We should all salute them as our new masters!/sarcasm
BTTT
The courts can claim that until they are blue in the face, but seeing some older woman treated like this for expressing her opinion, is revolting. The court then sides with people who have denied this woman her right to be heard.
Look, I’ll defend the right of these people to stand back five feet and out shout her if they want. I do not defend them trying to intimidate this woman in this badgering manner.
What a bunch of low lifes...
Officers could be reasonable expected to separate this woman from the others, ask her to stand on one corner and they on the next. Other than that I would agree. But to stand by and watch this, or to avoid it because things might get uncomfortable... I can buy into that, even if that is what is deemed the proper policy.
Your comments about what would constitute good protection here, seem to miss the mark in one consideration. We should not have our gun rights denied. On the other hand we shouldn’t make a choice to put ourselves in a predicament like this, then pull a gun to get ourselves out of it.
If she were on her corner and they on theirs, and she was physically accosted, I’d have to say she was within her rights.
If she walked over close to these folks and they gathered around her, I think she would be the one using poor judgment.
Take care.
It sounds like your friend and I have about the same outlook on this. I’m not looking to hurt people. I am looking to have the very core value of our nation preserved.
If the family goes, it’s done.
Thanks for your mention.
I remain unconvinced that because a young person had an urge, it automatically should make them a this or a that. Kids don’t know up from down. Someone generally tells them what is up from down, and if that person is the wrong person, good luck.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.