Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Video shows another BART cop hitting passenger
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | Sunday, January 25, 2009 | Marisa Lagos, Chronicle Staff Writer

Posted on 01/26/2009 2:12:13 PM PST by Navy Patriot

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: brytlea
I really wish we had more info out there.

Me too.

21 posted on 01/26/2009 3:02:42 PM PST by Navy Patriot (John McCain, the Manchurian Candidate, makes a Marxist President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rodney Dangerfield
Gun goes off when finger pulls trigger.

The guy was on the ground and restrained. Video pretty clearly shows the cop stood up, drew his weapon, aimed, and pulled the trigger.

Hard to see how that is an AD.

22 posted on 01/26/2009 3:11:45 PM PST by starlifter (Sapor Amo Pullus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: brytlea
unless the Bart officers really are just a totally out of control group who kill at will—and I can’t buy that yet.

Your innocence is charming, and I mean that in a good way.

BART cops are no worse than any other cops that have ever existed -- they consider themselves a breed apart, above the law. That's why they call us "civilians", even though they're just as "civilian" as anybody else. They're the Blue Army -- and sometimes the Blue Army kills people.

That's why is best to have as little to do with the police as possible -- because they ARE the law -- at least when no smartasses with cell phone cameras are around -- and with that kind of power even a "good cop" can go bad at any minute and with no warning. Next time it may be you or me on the receiving end of What are you gonna do -- call the cops ?

I think policing should be done by unarmed neighborhood watch groups backed up by professional paramilitary police like the Gendarmerie in France or the Carabinieri in Italy. Police should be under military discipline and subject to the UCMJ. When was the last time a GI shot an unarmed kid here in America -- 1970?

23 posted on 01/26/2009 3:15:19 PM PST by B-Chan (Catholic. Monarchist. Texan. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot
Interestingly all these videos went to the media first rather than to police or prosecutors.

You are implying the beaten upon should turn the evidence over to the mob that's administering the beating. Unbelievable. What kind of idiot are you?

24 posted on 01/26/2009 3:16:53 PM PST by LoneRangerMassachusetts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

While I agree that being a known “bad actor” could explain the police treating this particular person more harshly than might appear warranted, I don’t think that could ever justify shooting him while he’s down and doesn’t justify smacking him around while he’s not immediately threatening them. I have a lot of respect for the job police officers do and the stress they go through and understand that hindsight it 20/20 but given the power that we give police officers, we also have an interest in making sure that the people who don’t have the temperment for it aren’t given that power and to make sure that those who go way too far don’t literally get away with murder.


25 posted on 01/26/2009 3:19:51 PM PST by Question_Assumptions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot
BART cop or Blart cop?
26 posted on 01/26/2009 3:20:28 PM PST by Homer1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: starlifter

It seems pretty obvious from the shooter’s reaction that he’s as surprised as anyone. I really believe that he thought he was pulling his taser. I don’t know what you call that: involuntary manslaughter?


27 posted on 01/26/2009 3:21:22 PM PST by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep

1st degree murder facing lethal injection.


28 posted on 01/26/2009 3:26:45 PM PST by rednesss (Fred Thompson - 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
I'm not a lawyer, so not sure what the charge would be.

However, it seems pretty obvious that he unlawfully killed another person who was not an imminent threat to anyone.

Perhaps he did think he was pulling his taser. I know some are offering that opinion. I have difficulty with it since a taser is quite a bit different from a pistol:

TASER pic: http://defensereview.com/1_31_2004/Taser%20X26_1.jpg

Glock pic (I assume it was a Glock, but even if not I think the point remains):http://www.enemyforces.net/firearms/glock17_3.jpg

Hard to say what was going through the cop's mind, although I have my own theory. No doubt he is deeply remorseful. Hopefully he would be remorseful even if the incident was not recorded.

29 posted on 01/26/2009 3:29:17 PM PST by starlifter (Sapor Amo Pullus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

Has anybody seen this new video? The video at the link doesn’t seem to be it.


30 posted on 01/26/2009 3:29:21 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
It seems pretty obvious from the shooter’s reaction that he’s as surprised as anyone. I really believe that he thought he was pulling his taser. I don’t know what you call that: involuntary manslaughter?

Subject was already down on the ground, and in restraints. No need to even be pulling a taser here. Not involuntary manslaughter, at all. Murder, 2d degree depraved indifference to human life...

the infowarrior

31 posted on 01/26/2009 3:32:49 PM PST by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: LoneRangerMassachusetts
Take a couple Valium and buy a dictionary.
32 posted on 01/26/2009 3:33:06 PM PST by Navy Patriot (John McCain, the Manchurian Candidate, makes a Marxist President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Question_Assumptions
I don’t think that could ever justify shooting him while he’s down and doesn’t justify smacking him around while he’s not immediately threatening them.

I agree, and you will note that I recited specific facts must be present to allow "probable cause for more scrutiny".

Those being: a cop on the scene must:

1 Personally know the suspect AND be able to identify him.

2 The cop must also personally know of a felony or related misdemeanor CONVICTION of the suspect.

Also, "scrutiny" means investigation, not beating or shooting.

33 posted on 01/26/2009 3:44:16 PM PST by Navy Patriot (John McCain, the Manchurian Candidate, makes a Marxist President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ramius; All
The KTVU video is Here

The Chron won't link to Fox.

34 posted on 01/26/2009 3:53:25 PM PST by Navy Patriot (John McCain, the Manchurian Candidate, makes a Marxist President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

“Interestingly all these videos went to the media first rather than to police or prosecutors.”

According to an earlier thread

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2171950/posts

the police confiscated as many cell phones as they could, which is, per the thread, an illegal warrantless search and seizure. That IMO implies there is something they don’t want the rest of us to see, which therefore ironically supports one’s decision to take the video to the media.


35 posted on 01/26/2009 4:02:31 PM PST by jiggyboy (Ten per cent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan

I’m glad you find it charming. I admit my experience with the law has been little and mostly positive (ok, 2 speeding tickets in 35 years). Still even if they are overbearing bad kinda guys (and I know you didn’t mean they all were, but lets just assume) why would they be so careless to whack someone in full view of witnesses (and their cameras)? That’s why I am leaning toward it being some sort of horrible accident. I don’t mean by that that the cop who did it should just be given a slap on the wrist. When you assume a position of such authority over others you really have to be held to a higher standard. But it will take a little more info before I believe he just randomly murdered that kid just because.
But, I’m open for more info. And if he did indeed murder that guy, hang ‘em high.


36 posted on 01/26/2009 4:12:28 PM PST by brytlea (You can fool enough of the people enough of the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

OK... that’s the one I was looking for.

I can’t say it convinces me of anything one way or another. Guy#1 (the guy who got punched) was standing up... and turned and moved to his left to come up behind another cop dealing with somebody else. Then this cop (the punching one) left his guy#2 on the ground he was dealing with, came over and grabbed guy#1 pulling him back from the others and back up where he was with his back to the wall. There’s some scuffling that is admittedly a little fuzzy. I can’t tell what the guy#1 was doing with his hands, but he was grabbing either at the cop or his equipment. The the cop punches him pretty hard to the face, then steps back... the guy settles down to a sitting position.

Sure, maybe the cop was out of hand. But I’m not sure that this video says that. The important part is what you can’t see. You can’t really see what the guy was doing with his hands. Seems like that makes a difference.


37 posted on 01/26/2009 4:26:54 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: brytlea

I’m in pretty much that same space. The first video of the cop shooting the guy looks pretty bad. Sure, the guy was fighting while being put in restraints but he did seem to be mostly under the control of the other cops that were all over him.

And it does look to me like the most astonished person of all after the shot was the cop that fired his weapon. It looks like a dreadful yet accidental shooting, not an intentional execution.

But I’m willing to believe either, depending on where the evidence leads.


38 posted on 01/26/2009 4:33:31 PM PST by Ramius (Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot

I wonder what would have happened to the evidence at the police station?


39 posted on 01/26/2009 5:10:22 PM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

Police are not supposed to hit people lined up against a wall offering no resistance...get rid of the rotten apples before they destroy law enforcement’s reputation.


40 posted on 01/26/2009 5:11:42 PM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson