To: Dada Orwell
This will happen sooner or later, given the the lib tendencies to think that they are the only ones who have the correct answers.
2 posted on
02/01/2009 4:22:28 PM PST by
Da Coyote
To: Dada Orwell
There are several states that can secede according to the conditions they agreed to before coming into the Union. I don't know all of them, but Texas is one.
Actually, I've heard some rumblings about doing just that around my town.
3 posted on
02/01/2009 4:27:35 PM PST by
basil
( It's time to eliminate all "Gun Free Zones")
To: Dada Orwell
6 posted on
02/01/2009 4:39:25 PM PST by
RichInOC
(No! BAD Rich! (What'd I say?))
To: Professional Engineer
9 posted on
02/01/2009 4:53:50 PM PST by
Peanut Gallery
(The essence of freedom is the proper limitation of government.)
To: Dada Orwell
We tried that a while back. Didn’t work out quite like we’d hoped.
10 posted on
02/01/2009 5:07:11 PM PST by
Islander7
(If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
To: Dada Orwell
but they all voted this guy in? What gives. O did win NH.
To: Dada Orwell
29 posted on
02/01/2009 5:52:24 PM PST by
NonValueAdded
(Confidential to MSM: "Better Red than Read" is a failed business model.)
To: Dada Orwell
Arizona has been kicking around a similar bill since 2000 or so.
46 posted on
02/01/2009 6:38:39 PM PST by
Charles Martel
(Liberals are the crab grass in the lawn of life.)
To: Dada Orwell
It's about time... I always liked New Hampshire's attitude toward these matters, but the influx of Massachusetts libs in the last decade has really skewed things up there. I hope they stick to their guns this time. (pun intended)
-NJ Joe, from the red-state section of the People's State of New Jersey
48 posted on
02/01/2009 6:40:17 PM PST by
NewJerseyJoe
(Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
To: kalee
55 posted on
02/01/2009 7:05:41 PM PST by
kalee
(01/20/13 The end of an error.)
To: Dada Orwell
Maybe we have a state to take in millions of angry patriots...
71 posted on
02/01/2009 8:56:07 PM PST by
wastedyears
(April 21st, 2009 - International Iron Maiden Day)
To: Dada Orwell
If NH takes the lead God bless them but this is not a regional conflict. It doesn’t matter where you live or whose side great-great-granddad was on. We’re all rebels now.
78 posted on
02/01/2009 9:35:30 PM PST by
InABunkerUnderSF
(Illegal Immigration is not about the immigration. Gun control is not about the guns.)
To: Dada Orwell
IMHO, the proper thing for states to do would be to publicly announce that their officials were required
by their oath to the Constitution of the United States to resist any actions by anyone--including agents of the federal government--whose actions were forbidden by the Supreme Law of the Land. Nothing in the Constitution allows the Supreme Court or any other entity to authorize actions which are forbidden in plain and simple terms by the test of the document itself.
Some people would like to brand anyone who would oppose today's government an anarchist, ignoring the fact that opposition to totalitarian anarchists is necessary for the continued existence of lawful government.
79 posted on
02/01/2009 9:58:21 PM PST by
supercat
(Barry Soetoro == Bravo Sierra)
The Constitution was been rendered null and void on January 20, 2009, so constitutional arguments do not hold water.
Article II, Section 1 No Person [1]except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office [2]who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been [3]fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
When they secede, they will elect their own president.
108 posted on
02/02/2009 8:27:08 AM PST by
Just A Nobody
(I *LOVE* my Attitude Problem - NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA)
To: Dada Orwell
Isn’t New Hampshire the state that was chosen by some group to move to and try to shift public opinion and political actions to become more conservative? I forget what the effort was called.
124 posted on
02/02/2009 9:45:03 AM PST by
OB1kNOb
(Quinn's 1st Law - Liberalism always generates the exact opposite of its original intent.)
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; justiceseeker93; ..
157 posted on
02/02/2009 6:44:39 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
To: Dada Orwell
Wow thanks for all the responses guys. We may have a more naked pro secession bill next year in NH.
160 posted on
02/03/2009 7:10:19 PM PST by
Dada Orwell
(www.freestateproject.org)
To: Dada Orwell; MamaTexan
Just caught up on all the posts, a fascinating discussion with great bearing on today’s times and government.
I’ve definitely learned at lot from our discussions on this thread, and I have a lot more reading to do now as a lot of quality information was put out... thanks MamaTexan.
I hope scenarios like this never comes to fruition, but with the unconstitutional actions of the government I could actually see how it could take place in the near future, if that is the case, I’ll be going back home to Texas and let the chips fall where they may.
Thanks to all... AOV
161 posted on
02/04/2009 1:40:51 PM PST by
AvOrdVet
("Put the wagons in a circle for all the good it'll do")
163 posted on
02/06/2009 7:26:53 AM PST by
SunkenCiv
(https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson