Skip to comments.
Knights Templar hid the Shroud of Turin, says Vatican
Times Online ^
| 04/05/2009
| Richard Owen
Posted on 04/05/2009 12:20:47 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-257 next last
To: BroJoeK
Funny, he doesn't look Jewish.
Funny, he's got the marks of a phylactery on his forehead. That looks distinctly Jewish.
21
posted on
04/05/2009 12:45:39 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: nufsed
Where was the shroud from 1-1204?
You mean "from ~33 to 1204"? In Constantinople in the care of the Eastern Church?
22
posted on
04/05/2009 12:48:33 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: aruanan
So in 33 the shroud was transported to Constantinople?
Source?
23
posted on
04/05/2009 12:50:06 PM PDT
by
nufsed
(Release the birth certificate, passport and school records.)
To: Interesting Times
24
posted on
04/05/2009 12:50:55 PM PDT
by
zot
To: Kansas58
Think of the Templars as: Bank
Think that the king will kill hundreds of bankers?
25
posted on
04/05/2009 12:51:06 PM PDT
by
mountainlion
(concerned conservative.)
To: aruanan
Is that the little prayer box?
26
posted on
04/05/2009 12:51:24 PM PDT
by
patton
(I hope that they fight to the death and both sides win.)
To: nufsed
Constantinople? I really don’t know much about the shroud.
To: fatima
Probably in the same place as the ...
Ark of the Covenant.
You know, that large gov’t warehouse in the desert west.
28
posted on
04/05/2009 12:55:51 PM PDT
by
CapnJack
To: nufsed
So in 33 the shroud was transported to Constantinople? Source?
You're overlooking the obvious. If the shroud dates from the first century, it wasn't anywhere before ~33AD
29
posted on
04/05/2009 1:00:31 PM PDT
by
aruanan
To: CapnJack
It’s supposed to be in Axum Ethiopia if you believe the Ethiopian Orthodox Church or Graham Hancock (Sign and the Seal). Hancock’s book is a good read and makes a pretty good case.
30
posted on
04/05/2009 1:00:55 PM PDT
by
airedale
( XZ)
To: aruanan
You’re misreading AND avoiding the question.
31
posted on
04/05/2009 1:01:27 PM PDT
by
nufsed
(Release the birth certificate, passport and school records.)
To: mountainlion
He might as well kill the bankers, he whipped up angry mobs against AIG, even though OBAMA signed a law protecting the contractual bonuses!
Then, Obama told the bankers, “I am the only thing between you and the pitchforks” -—
Then, Obama looks the other way when his Dem buddies at Freddie and Fannie get THEIR bonuses!
History repeats itself!
Also, the Templars were the bankers AND the feudal defenders of Christianity against Islam.
And the French King “went for the gold” and killed off the Templars.
Just like Obama is cutting our military to “spread the wealth around”.
32
posted on
04/05/2009 1:02:23 PM PDT
by
Kansas58
To: CapnJack; fatima
Actually, the strongest tradition for the location of the Ark of the Covenant is a town in Ethiopia along the Nile called Oxham (I'm not sure how it's spelled). It hasn't been seen in almost 2,000 years, but that's the last place it was seen and the place that claims it. The Grail supposedly was kept under the temple in Jerusalem and then disappeared at some point in the middle ages. There are a number of rumors. What's true and what's not...God knows.
33
posted on
04/05/2009 1:03:30 PM PDT
by
Desdemona
(Tolerance of grave evil is NOT a Christian virtue. http://www.thekingsmen.us/)
To: Alamo-Girl; albee; AnalogReigns; AnAmericanMother; Angelas; AniGrrl; annalex; annyokie; ...
Shroud of Turin WAS held by the Knights Templar after the Fourth Crusade according to documentation found in the Vatican Archives ... PING!
If you want on or off the Shroud of Turin Ping List, Freepmail me.
|
|
|
34
posted on
04/05/2009 1:04:14 PM PDT
by
Swordmaker
(Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
To: BuckeyeTexan
Discovery Channel or History Channel did a special a few years back on the Shroud of Turin. Apparently, for political reasons and fear of power of the Knights Templar brought their downfall by the King & the Pope. And yes, the carbon dating of the Shroud indicated that it was of later date, and therefore a fake. The sample taken was just a few threads from a corner. I seriously doubt that any samples will ever be taken again. And the story will grow.
35
posted on
04/05/2009 1:08:53 PM PDT
by
lilylangtree
(Veni, Vidi, Vici)
To: Kansas58
Then, Obama told the bankers, I am the only thing between you and the pitchforks Never mind that the majority of us live in cities and pitchforks are not exactly common in garages anymore.
But, to the point of the post - yes, the Templars were framed, more or less, in a political move and it should not be surprising to anyone who knows history of that time halfway decently that they would have brought the Shroud from Constantinople. It's as plausible as anything else.
36
posted on
04/05/2009 1:09:06 PM PDT
by
Desdemona
(Tolerance of grave evil is NOT a Christian virtue. http://www.thekingsmen.us/)
Comment #37 Removed by Moderator
To: SonOfPyrodex
LOL. They forgot to get the stainout.
You made it 0 for 3, but with humor.
38
posted on
04/05/2009 1:12:01 PM PDT
by
nufsed
(Release the birth certificate, passport and school records.)
To: aruanan; nufsed
First century is 0-99 not 100-199; example, 19th century is 1800-1899, 20th century 1900-1999 and so on.
39
posted on
04/05/2009 1:12:12 PM PDT
by
1066AD
To: 1066AD
I remember now. The year 0. Wasn’t that when nothing happened?
40
posted on
04/05/2009 1:13:09 PM PDT
by
nufsed
(Release the birth certificate, passport and school records.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 241-257 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson