Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Tea Party) Protest to go ahead without permit (Tea Party/Tax Revolt updates and links)
Rutland Herald ^ | April 11, 2009 | Stephanie M. Peters

Posted on 04/11/2009 8:50:00 AM PDT by abb

West Rutland resident Jon Wallace is moving ahead with plans for Wednesday's Tax Day Tea Party in Main Street Park, despite being denied a special event permit by the Board of Aldermen this week.

When it comes down to it, he said, he's been told he doesn't really need the permit. And he doesn't see how the aldermen think they could deny protestors' First Amendment rights to free speech and assembly anyway, he said.

"My gut feeling was that 'thou doth protest too much,'" Wallace said of the board's decision to deny the permit. Wallace was not at Monday night's aldermen meeting — a sticking point for several members of the board irritated both by the short notice of the request and the fact they couldn't get answers to some lingering questions.

"What are they afraid of?" he said Friday. "If your ear is to the ground and you're listening to people and you're trying to do the people's work, my God you're going to be standing there with us embracing us."

Wallace is the Vermont state coordinator for a grassroots effort to hold a coordinated, national tea party protest. According to the Tax Day Tea Party Web site, more than 600 cities will play host to similar rallies, including Montpelier.

The rallies aren't meant to be divisive or partisan, in fact Wallace describes them as "genteel." That said, he wanted to dot his i's and cross his t's by getting a permit even though the event doesn't feature vendors, require streets to be blocked off or require a police detail.

So he obtained the necessary sign-offs from the Parks and Recreation Department, city police, city fire and the city attorney, as well as liability insurance. Thus he was shocked when he heard his request had been denied.

Alderman William Notte was the first to raise concerns about the event during Monday's meeting. He voted against it, and followed up his decision by writing an e-mail to the group explaining his rationale and noting this doesn't mean the event couldn't go on — a question addressed by City Attorney Andrew Costello during the meeting.

"All we did, in my opinion, by not giving them a special event permit was not give them the city's official approval, which would limit our liability if something went wrong," Notte said.

Police Lt. Kevin Geno also seconded Costello's opinion that when held Wednesday, the rally will not be in violation of the law.

"They were just being cautious and doing the right thing really just to let the city fathers know what was going on," Geno said. "They can still hold it."

If the permit request had been turned in even two weeks sooner — and the permit form does state it should be submitted at least 30 days prior to the proposed event — Notte said he believes it would have been approved without a hitch.

"This is a good example of why anyone coming (to the aldermen with a request) for the first time would be well served to send a representative to the meeting," he said.

While it may be a good idea, it's not a written requirement. Yet Notte wasn't the only alderman to express his displeasure that someone from the group — which it was also noted the board is unfamiliar with — wasn't in attendance.

Wallace didn't know it was expected of him, he said when reached after the meeting Monday night. In fact, he didn't even realize the permit was subject to the board's final OK. He thought he'd already received it.

That confusion could open the city up for accusations of discrimination, according to Allen Gilbert, ACLU of Vermont's executive director.

"It's a problem if the regulation doesn't make clear what their requirements are," Gilbert said. "That sort of vagueness can easily lead to discriminatory treatment and a public body wants to avoid that when it comes to granting permission or withholding permission for using a public space."

David Allaire, president of the Board of Aldermen, said a discussion about tweaking the permit requirements is already under way.

"I think it's a good idea to look at the permit and see if there are some additional requirements that we want to put in place, and also look and see if this is something we want to actually have in an ordinance to give it some basis of law other than just a policy," Allaire said Friday.

He said he wasn't aware before the start of the meeting that any of his board members were planning to take issue with the request. If he had, "maybe we would have been able to contact (Wallace)… (The permit procedures) are not common public knowledge."

stephanie.peters@rutlandherald.com


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Vermont
KEYWORDS: communism; freespeech; liberalnazis; taxes; taxrevolt; teaparty; vermont
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: oh8eleven
You are half right
Congress shall make no law
Nothing in the Constitution prevents state and local governments from regulation assembly
Read the 10th amendment.

It's the hipocracy of the LOCAL government that decides
that certain groups can protest and not others
41 posted on 04/11/2009 10:29:37 AM PDT by acsrp38 (arrogant and derisive and proud of it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: acsrp38
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

I'm no lawyer or scholar but my understanding is that since the Constitution declares the right to peaceful assembly, no state can write a law restricting that right.
Perhaps I'm just too naive .... and freedom loving.
42 posted on 04/11/2009 10:44:38 AM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: abb
VERMONT
43 posted on 04/11/2009 10:46:10 AM PDT by Bob Eimiller (appeasement "it's the idea that if you feed the alligator he will eat you last." Winston Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

I am not saying that the state or local government can trump the Constitution. But the orignal intent of the founders was that the Constitution limited the federal government.

The government also has the responsibility to “secure domestic tranquility”. As in protect from violence by a mob.

The states and cities cannot trump the Constitution, but they can regulate. They can require permits. hold the organization responsible for damage or injury, they can require you to provide security.

I think in the case here we are talking about the local government hypocrasy and prejudice.

We are agreeing with the premise but for different reasons.

By the way, do you think you can hold a protest on private property?? Can I restrict your right to speech, assembly, or prevent you from practicing your religion in my front yard???


44 posted on 04/11/2009 11:37:12 AM PDT by acsrp38 (arrogant and derisive and proud of it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: abb

Don’t even ask for a permit. JUST DO IT!


45 posted on 04/11/2009 11:38:47 AM PDT by unixfox (The 13th Amendment Abolished Slavery, The 16th Amendment Reinstated It !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
Why didn't you hear, president obambi has CANCELLED Freedom.

46 posted on 04/11/2009 11:48:41 AM PDT by timestax (CNNLIES..BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
bye bye Freedom, bye bye. Uncle Sam has declared war on Freedom!

47 posted on 04/11/2009 11:51:52 AM PDT by timestax (CNNLIES..BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timestax
Washington D.C. has canceled Freedom until further notice!

48 posted on 04/11/2009 12:30:17 PM PDT by timestax (CNNLIES..BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: acsrp38
By the way, do you think you can hold a protest on private property??
No. But then again, the Supreme Court ruled there is no more private property vis-à-vis eminent domain.
49 posted on 04/11/2009 12:32:45 PM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven

That’s true


50 posted on 04/11/2009 1:06:20 PM PDT by acsrp38 (arrogant and derisive and proud of it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: abb

http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2009/04/residents-rally-against-taxes-in-hermosa-beach.html
Residents rally against taxes in Hermosa Beach

Residents rally against taxes in Hermosa Beach
TEA parties planned in Jacksonville, Morehead City

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/12/business/economy/12every.html
When an Economic Cure Fights Itself

http://www.contracostatimes.com/politics/ci_12123203
Tea Party protest draws angry taxpayers

http://www.vvdailypress.com/news/tea_11791___article.html/coming_day.html
Tea-Day is coming

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/jeff-poor/2009/04/11/predictable-msnbc-s-shuster-newsweek-s-gross-belittle-misconstrue-tea-par
Predictable: MSNBC’s Shuster, Newsweek’s Gross Belittle and Misconstrue Tea Party Efforts

http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/cityregion/s_620270.html
Several thousand jam North Shore for bailout ‘tea party’

http://www.mcalesternews.com/homepage/local_story_101130726.html?keyword=leadpicturestory
‘TEA’ party’ at McAlester federal building planned

http://www.timesheraldonline.com/ci_12122291?source=most_viewed
Vallejo ‘Tea Party’ protest set for tax day


51 posted on 04/11/2009 1:31:00 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: abb

http://davedufour.wordpress.com/2009/04/11/goshen-tea-party-2/
Cellphone picture from the event. More to come.
Goshen, Indiana

http://rightsright.wordpress.com/2009/04/11/4-days-til-tea-party-boise-go-idaho/
4 Days Til Tea Party Boise!! Go Idaho


52 posted on 04/11/2009 1:39:06 PM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: abb

Amen,its your right,just do it.


53 posted on 04/11/2009 2:47:20 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timestax

bump


54 posted on 04/11/2009 7:18:14 PM PDT by timestax (CNNLIES..BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: timestax

55 posted on 04/11/2009 11:23:18 PM PDT by timestax (CNNLIES..BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: timestax

bttt


56 posted on 04/12/2009 9:52:25 AM PDT by timestax (CNNLIES..BIG TIME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: abb

Ft. Bend County,TX Teaparty (Sugar Land City Hall)

57 posted on 04/12/2009 4:46:47 PM PDT by smokingfrog (The man who killed Baby Beluga.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson