Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For Conservatives who seriously want to kick some RINO butt...
5/10/09 | Ron C

Posted on 05/10/2009 1:08:11 AM PDT by Ron C.

Warning – this is a long and ‘windy’ post – not recommended for the semi-conservative or casual reader.

Lately I’ve ran across many a post and comment on FR that made me decide to again post about politics - for the sake of many of the newer Freepers – and for this nations sake. This post by Jim Robinson is corollary to what follows. Read it – Jim defines what I call a complete conservative.

Now, the first item of business - the definition of the 'Republican Party,' a.k.a., the GOP. A few members of Congress, a couple of state governors and a few past candidates for high office generally prompt the greatest amount of disparagement of the GOP on this website. Their voting screw-ups and lackluster comments are often used to denigrate 'the GOP' in general and often followed by statements such as, "Screw the GOP, I’ll never vote Republican again." That insults many, and proves that writers know little to nothing about party maintenance, or have any clue as their own responsibility for it. Yet, it is literally the voting public at large that determines what a political party becomes – it’s strengths and it’s weaknesses are a direct result of the level of public oversight and involvement in all aspects of party function and activity at the local level. Ignore that, and you get ever-poorer performance at the top – on par with the poorer performance of the citizenry in general at the bottom (local level.)

First - what the GOP is not. It is not defined by, nor do sitting members of Congress solely constitute ‘the GOP’ – yet that is the most common perception. Nor is the RNC, with a mere 165 members 'the GOP.' (All of them count in the national total, yet they are a distinct minority, very much outnumbered and at the eventual certain mercy of the total. Oh, sure – they are a powerful minority – but ultimately irrelevant in the face of the majority.)

"The party," - all political parties are made up solely of elected and appointed members within each State of the Union, along with a few chartered party club members which are by charter are allowed to join the party, pay dues, and allowed to vote in state and local party business. In California, the most populous state, there are only about 3,000 dues-paying party members qualified to vote in party business meetings and in State Party Conventions. The huge majority of GOP members in every state are elected district party representatives in local district 'central committees' – aka, 'wards' in eastern states. Of course, any elected state GOP officeholder is a member, as are any alternates or those they are allowed to appoint as members of the state party. In smaller States, the number is much less. An average per state would be perhaps 1,000 party members in the more numerous smaller states.

There is no published figure of what the 'total GOP party members nationally' is, nor is there such a figure for the 'Democratic' Party. The entirety of the GOP is not more than 62,000 members nationally.

So, lump all the RINO’s you can think of that currently serve in state and national government together, and add up the figure. Lets say you know a lot of RINO’s in Congress, and in State legislatures – and you can come up with as many as 100 of them. That would be .19% of total GOP membership – hardly representative of the huge majority at the local level, most of them quite conservative.

The second item of business here is wrapped up in what it means to be 'conservative.' You’ll not find a better definition of it than what Jim Robinson had to say in that link above. But I would go quite a bit further than Jim did – particularly in using that word 'aggressively.'

If you are under attack and faltering, and the GOP is – and if you really want to aggressively alter the makeup of the GOP – you become part of it. I did, and I have made a big difference (admittedly in the somewhat past) – by being a key force in routing RINO’s from State party leadership positions in droves. If you are really conservative, you join the war – where it counts. Either true conservatives help keep the party conservative – or you fail the final test of conservatism itself. That failure became ever greater after Ronald Reagan was elected – to the point that today less than .01 percent of GOP affiliated voters ever darken the doors of GOP meetings in their own neighborhood – and many that do are not conservative. That low number is a measure of the knowledge of the pubic in general, and of Conservatism wisdom in particular. Yet that door is THE most critical place where conservatives can help ensure the level of conservatism within the party. It seemed that once Reagan was in office, conservatives felt that their presence in the system was no longer needed. Also distressing has been the steep decline in the number of the 'faithful' – which should understand being 'watchmen on the wall' far better than those without wisdom. Sadly, today the level of Church involvement has declined to its lowest point in US history – yet, in stark comparison, during the Founding Era ministers were literally among those at the forefront of political activity.

Third - one thing needs to be understood clearly. Conservatives are extremely unlikely to ever prosper outside of the Republican Party. They must either fight to keep it pure (that is, socialism / socialist free) at the local level – or haul up the white flag of surrender. Third parties have done nothing to prosper conservatism, throughout this nation’s history. In fact, the few that have claimed conservatism (and largely aren’t) have repeatedly succeeded in doing nothing more than electing Democrats in the districts where third party candidates drew 1 to 2% of the vote – the margin by which the Democrat won. When any do gain office, they generally prove far less than conservative.

In fact the largest 'third party' vote ever recorded in US history was that of the 'Progressive Party' under Theodore Roosevelt, which drew 27.4% of the vote. But, note well - in the early 1900’s Democrats were the conservatives, while Republicans were the first to drift off into ‘progressive’ socialist politics. Unfortunately for us today, early 1900’s 'progressive' Republicans radically altered our political process, by co-opting political power to the top of the political ladder from the local level where it had resided for over 130 years. That single action helped send the party into the wilderness for near 50 years, and while it was there Democrats turned socialist and the Republican Party slowly became conservative.

Ultimately the degree of conservative success rests with conservatives themselves. And, if you’re like me – you’re a working stiff with a job somewhere or you’re working your buns off keeping a home together, caring for your family. You don’t have a lot of time – or a lot of money to sink into political activities, so if you’re going to do anything – you need to know how to be most effective with what little time you have. And believe me, you can be very effective, if you know what to do – and that is, walk into the real political arena nearest to you – at the local level, and figuratively, put on your political brass knuckles.

It is probably less than twenty minutes away from the front door of most Freepers. And, quite likely, you can gain a voting seat (without election) – simply by showing up – once or twice a month. (That is, if the local district committee is a few people shy of their allotted number of seats filled.) But, even if all the seats are filled, they all need alternates to sit in for them when they cannot attend for some reason. So take a friend or family member with you. It is worth noting here that quite often only one or two people will actually go to the trouble of getting the few signatures that it takes to get on the ballot for the Central Committee in a California district. When that happens, they are ‘elected’ by default. The position and their names don’t even appear on the ballot! Then, THEY get to appoint the remaining people to bring the district committee to its allotted number. That is a stark difference from public oversight – or 'conservative' attention to what makes up the party they choose to affiliate with. It is such apathy and indifference that has produced the squishy nature of the GOP in the largest and most populous states, and has led to ever greater pollution in even the most conservative states.

For over two decades, I voted many times per month – at the local district level, and at the county level. And, as a dues paying elected or appointed member of the state GOP, I voted often at all state conventions. I worked hard to purge liberals from any power in the state party, and I became highly effective at it. Ask RINO Pete Wilson how effective I have been. Ask Arianna Huffington, and her millionaire switch-hitting ex-husband Michael (with a very obvious case of aids) who both came lurking around the CA GOP, claiming that they were staunch Republicans. (Luckily, I knew about Arianna’s deranged past long before she came in the door – thanks to early use of the then brand new Internet.) Neither one got far, and both eventually left the GOP after being exposed for what they both were.

Bottom line, if Freepers really hope to see a GOP that harks back to conservative principles, and want to aggressively pursue such a goal - the only process that is effective begins at the most numerous level of the elected party – a few minutes away from your home. If we cannot be guardians at these most important gates to the political arena – forget about it at the state and national level. It is within this arena that conservatives can effectively block RINO’s from moving higher up the political ladder – by identifying them through personal contact, listening to their conversation, finding out what they believe and would like to see come to pass in future legislation. It is in this arena that you can identify the best – and help promote them toward higher office – and easily stop the worst of the worst.

The Reagan Revolution was initially energized by thousands of conservatives that had begun with Barry Goldwater a few years prior. In those days, back-yard political gatherings attracted literally thousands of local teens and college youth – and their parents – all of whom provided an energy level beyond any seen prior or since.

Conservatives could easily make that all happen once again – if enough of them decide they really want to become aggressive at making a political difference. Absent such an effort – conservatives will have only themselves, and their personal lack of effort to blame. Samuel Landon, one of our Founding Fathers, said it best. "On the people, therefore, of these United-States it depends whether wise men, or fools, good or bad men, shall govern them; whether they shall have righteous laws, a faithful administration of government, and permanent good order, peace, and liberty; or, on the contrary, feel insupportable burdens, and see all their affairs run to confusion and ruin."

Samuel Langdon is also quite famous for the following quote, from the same sermon. (spelling here is as in the original.)

"From year to year be careful in the choice of your representatives, and all the higher powers of government. Fix your eyes upon men of good understanding, and known honesty; men of knowledge, improved by experience; men who fear God, and hate covetousness; who love truth and righteousness, and sincerely wish the public welfare. Beware of such as are cunning rather than wise; who prefer their own interest to every thing; whose judgment is partial, or fickle; and whom you would not willingly trust with your own private interests. When meetings are called for the choice of your rulers, do not carelessly neglect them, or give your votes with indifference, just as any party may persuade, or a sordid treat tempt you; but act with serious deliberation and judgment, as in a most important matter, and let the faithful of the land serve you. Let not men openly irreligious and immoral become your legislators; for how can you expect good laws to be made by men who have no fear of God before their eyes, and who boldly trample on the authority of his commands? And will not the example of their impiety and immorality defeat the efficacy of the best laws which can be made in favour of religion and virtue? If the legislative body are corrupt, you will soon have bad men for counsellors, corrupt judges, unqualified justices, and officers in every department who will dishonor their stations; the consequence of which will be murmurs and complaints from every quarter."

Sorry my rant is so long - but, unfortunately in some ways it is not nearly long enough. For those that have never really entered the political arena, there is a world of things you should know, and will have to learn on your own, and from others that have gone before you. I can not say it more bluntly than this - if you do not go, learn, and fight - then who will?

May God bless you...

Ron


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Government; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: activism; conservatism; conservative; gop; republicans; rino; spartansixdelta; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 301-315 next last
Sad to say, the level of knowledge in conservatism is only slightly greater than that of the liberal left. Conservatives know there is a stark difference, but they know too little about how to fight back - but, worse than that, they have little desire to fight back in effective ways. That must change, and it can - easily. If you want to know more, don't hesitate to drop me a line in Freepmail.
1 posted on 05/10/2009 1:08:11 AM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

Thanks for the post Ron C. I look forward to reading it.


2 posted on 05/10/2009 1:09:32 AM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOP Poet

~grin~ - yeah, I know... you have to have the time... 8^)

Tx...

Ron


3 posted on 05/10/2009 1:15:11 AM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Molly Pitcher; Kathy in Alaska; Jim Robinson; JohnHuang2

Use your ping list - and point some of the ‘regulars’ here - that need to know what they perhaps don’t know, or know a bit, but perhaps believe they have no power to change anything.


4 posted on 05/10/2009 1:36:26 AM PDT by Ron C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

Marked for a later read, it looks like it could be very good... already took my sleeping pill........ fading ........ feeling light headed..... kinda funny.... kinda drunk.... slipping... drifting... fuzzy head.... I’m gone...... zzzzzzzzzz ZZZZZZZZZZ


5 posted on 05/10/2009 1:43:22 AM PDT by Gator113 (Weak-coward-racist-white hating-lying-traitor= Surrender Monkey in Chief-B. Hussein Obama...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

Later Bttt


6 posted on 05/10/2009 1:56:57 AM PDT by Bradís Gramma (Life is but a big granola bar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

The US Constitution is in many ways shorter, and far more to the point.

Please do not invoke Jims good name upon that which would take longer to read. I skimed it to be sure, absolute snozze fest.
Ron C. fire us up, or tell us something that we don’t already know. and be concise and short about it.


7 posted on 05/10/2009 1:59:47 AM PDT by ChetNavVet (Build It, and they won't come!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.
"But, note well - in the early 1900’s Democrats were the conservatives, while Republicans were the first to drift off into ‘progressive’ socialist politics."

I'd say there were equal numbers in both parties. But the Dems were actively trying to purge Conservatives as long ago as the 1890s, under Socialists like IL Gov. John Altgeld (probably the most radical Governor in that state's history - and so far to the left that the ostensible "Progressive" Theodore Roosevelt lambasted him from the right, effectively calling him a Parisian Communist) and their attempt to take over the party with William Jennings Bryan. They wanted to make sure Grover Cleveland types never would become President again under the Dem banner. None ever did.

8 posted on 05/10/2009 2:16:57 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

Well reasoned. The GOP is the best available vehicle for conservative political activism. Whining and carping from the sidelines gains nothing.


9 posted on 05/10/2009 3:21:22 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

It only takes a spark to get a fire going!


10 posted on 05/10/2009 3:30:54 AM PDT by johnthebaptistmoore (Conservatives obey the rules. Leftists cheat. Who probably has the political advantage?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.
Third parties have done nothing to prosper conservatism, throughout this nation’s history. In fact, the few that have claimed conservatism (and largely aren’t) have repeatedly succeeded in doing nothing more than electing Democrats

Amen Brother. Someone needs to get Glenn "the Clown" Beck to understand that.

Hes trying his hardest to use Fox News to start up a new Libertarian push.


11 posted on 05/10/2009 3:30:55 AM PDT by DainBramage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

BTTT


12 posted on 05/10/2009 3:54:06 AM PDT by jeepers creepers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.
Either true conservatives help keep the party conservative – or you fail the final test of conservatism itself.

Your self appointed litmus test for Conservatism leaves a lot to be desired. Your post is based on the false premise the socialists in the OP are the RINO's(minority). Party leadership has purposely moved to the socialist left at the expense of Conservatism in order to expand the voter base. Consequently Conservatives are the RINO's. Continually returning to the party that has repeatedly abandon Conservative principles and made Conservatives the minority is the political version of battered wife syndrome. It couldn't be more illogical. They have merged with the socialist Democrats to become one big socialist Republicrat party system.

Conservatives will only be able to restore the two party system by supporting a Conservative party based on strong Conservative principles.

Conservatives could easily make that all happen once again – if enough of them decide they really want to become aggressive at making a political difference

If restoring Conservatism to the OP is so easy then it should have and could have been done long ago. The fact is it wasn't done because the party doesn't want it to happen. Conservatives need to look past the party name and accept the fact it is time to form their own party instead of remaining in one where they are merely a wing of the party. Your post doesn't pass the smell test.
13 posted on 05/10/2009 3:59:13 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockingham
Well reasoned. The GOP is the best available vehicle for conservative political activism.

It couldn't make less sense. The OP would never have degenerated into the socialist morass over the past several years if your statement were true. The OP rank and file are too hung up on party names. They need to look past the name and see the ideology has morphed into that of the socialist left creating one big socialist party. The best available vehicle to restore the two party system is by supporting a conservative party committed to strong conservative principles instead of employing the big tent mentality that to this day the OP insists on using.
14 posted on 05/10/2009 4:03:57 AM PDT by Man50D (Fair Tax, you earn it, you keep it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DainBramage

agreed
At first I was enjoying watching him but his constant harping on how republicans are bad and just as bad as the left has done my head in now.

Then he had that nut on some time ago from 20/20 who thnks that we should eat bears and their numbers will go up.
Then he has another nut from Vegas on somettimes who is just as bad


15 posted on 05/10/2009 4:12:48 AM PDT by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman no sick queer sham--- end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.
Conservatives know there is a stark difference, but they know too little about how to fight back - but, worse than that, they have little desire to fight back in effective ways.

I believe these problems have their roots within the very concept of Conservatism. Among the definitions of a "conservative" are being cautious, avoiding excess, and resisting change.

All of these are positive qualities if not taken to a ridiculous extreme, however the Left has effectively demonized those of us who are disinclined to change how things work if there is no good reason for doing so. The axiom "If it works, don't fix it" is an appropriate saying for true Conservatives.

Admiral Yamamoto quite correctly predicted after the attack on Pearl Harbor that, "...all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve". Conservatives seem to be very slow to take action, but once they do, they tend to follow through until the objective is achieved.

Warnings were apparent before the attack on Pearl Harbor, just as we were aware that the World Trade Center was a prime target for terrorists.

The key question we must ask ourselves relative to these historical attacks is "why didn't we do something about it beforehand?" Again, remember what key trait defines Conservatism - we tend not to change unless there is good cause, and this cautious nature lends itself easily to a rejection of perceived alarmism.

We had numerous warnings before the election, yet Conservatives were ill-prepared to counter Obama supporters. Those of us who did take a vocal and active stand against his radical socialism were labeled as unenlightened Extremists.

History repeats itself, and eventually Conservatives will stand together in defiance of these attacks on our Liberties, but I fear it may take far too much time for a "sleeping giant" reaction. Ron C. is absolutely correct in that we MUST take action now at the local level to effect change that is necessary. We see it, and we know our liberties are systematically being removed. As repugnant as it may seem to us, we all must adopt tactics from the Left in order to save our nation.

Grassroots efforts such as involvement in local politics is how the liberals began this current assault. We must do the same and not look towards any one individual to save our freedoms.

16 posted on 05/10/2009 4:17:57 AM PDT by NoPrisoners ("When in the course of human events...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChetNavVet; Ron C.
Ron C. fire us up, or tell us something that we don’t already know. and be concise and short about it.

There it is in a nutshell. We are not interested in an actual strategy and actual directions on how to work towards a goal. No, we do not want to go to meetings. We do not want to do actual work. We want to be fired up.

Then we can sit here at our keyboards and smolder. Perhaps, on really good days, we may begin to smoke a little and sometimes even begin to glow.

But work? That's crazy talk.

17 posted on 05/10/2009 4:21:39 AM PDT by don-o (My son, Ben - Marine Private First Class - 1/16/09 - Parris Island, SC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: don-o
We are not interested in an actual strategy and actual directions on how to work towards a goal. No, we do not want to go to meetings. We do not want to do actual work. We want to be fired up.

BINGO!

Let's all have a huge pity-party. Whine & moan about how the Republican party has betrayed us all you want, but remember one thing:

WE ELECTED THESE TURKEYS!

Don't like where the country is headed? Then get off yer duff!!!

18 posted on 05/10/2009 4:27:52 AM PDT by NoPrisoners ("When in the course of human events...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.
You wasted bandwidth. I can sum up the Free Republic definition of "conservative" quite succinctly:

Whatever It is, It Sure As Hell Ain't YOU!!

Just as sure as there is no god, conservatives will never unite under one banner again.

19 posted on 05/10/2009 4:40:13 AM PDT by Old Sarge (Remember, remember, the Fourth of November, the Socialist treason and plot...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnthebaptistmoore

And you would think all the wind found on Free Republic would produce a Santa Barbara wildfire across the nation. Who is putting it out?


20 posted on 05/10/2009 4:53:38 AM PDT by huldah1776 ( Worthy is the Lamb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

bump


21 posted on 05/10/2009 5:01:54 AM PDT by Repeal The 17th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DainBramage

Glenn “the Clown” Beck doesn’t really have a clue about politics, he is a bit of a latter day Huey Long. His real value is that he gets under the bonnett of both sides, especially the Olberdorf, Madcow, Bill O’ & Hannity bloviators.


22 posted on 05/10/2009 5:08:06 AM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: iopscusa

If you look at party indentification of voters, self declared ‘Republicans’ have been dropping like stone for several years.

I fear the “GOP” brand is damaged in the eyes of voters and citizens do not want to self-indentify with it.

Moderates: Moderate Republicans are now more socially/fiscally liberal. Identify and voted for Obama. “Lets give him a chance.” “Reaganism is dead”. “Lets open the borders”.

Conservatives: Conservative Republicans are socially/fiscally conservative and can not tolerate what the GOP leadership has done to the Republican party of the past several years and do not identify as Republicans anymore but ‘independents’.

Solution?

1) Conservatives must kick liberal/moderate Republican leadership OUT of the party. The race to out Democrat - Democrats simply does not work and never will. Being moderate means never taking a stand on any issue lest you offend someone. That is not leadership.

2) Set in writing a core set of party principles similar to wildly effective and long forgotten by our leadership “Contract with America”.

3) Don’t tolerate RINO’s in the party leadership because you see where that gets you ‘Spector, Snowe, Jeffords, etc).


23 posted on 05/10/2009 5:27:08 AM PDT by WaterBoard (Somewhere a Village is Missing it's Socialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WaterBoard
The current GOP leadership has managed to damage the 'brand' and drive away its memberships. Time to replace all the GOP leadership or we must create a new party.


24 posted on 05/10/2009 5:29:18 AM PDT by WaterBoard (Somewhere a Village is Missing it's Socialist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

News and Activism?


25 posted on 05/10/2009 5:56:53 AM PDT by Chris DeWeese (http://www.firstcenturychristianity.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

It has always amazed me that the “Conservative” talking pundits of the airwaves have never mentioned this. If 0.01%of the energy wasted by listening to talk radio went into committee work with their opinions, it would make a far greater difference to the country than listening to pundits preaching to the choir.


26 posted on 05/10/2009 6:01:19 AM PDT by Kenny Bunk (The Election of 2008: Given the choice between stupid and evil, the stupid chose evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

After reading some of the posts on this thread, the logic of some is that the GOP cannot be made into a conservative vehicle because some are against us.

But we should believe that by creating a third party, nobody will be against us.....ignoring the fact that the remnants of the OP and Dems would crush that third party jointly.

Just because a person understands and loves conservatism does not always mean they have a brain that is useful for politics.

Some people are just meant to vote while others are meant to lead.


27 posted on 05/10/2009 6:15:01 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D; Ron C.
I'm with Man50D. A much quicker path to either restoring the GOP or killing it quickly and moving on would be to have a strong, third party CONSERVATIVE ticket in 2012 - Palin/Bachmann perhaps.

Sure it may not win, but it will send a clear message to the Beltway GOP elitists that neither will they without the Conservative base. That message will be: Join or Die!

If the majority of voters aren't fed up with Obama and DNC-flavored socialism by 2010 and 2012, the republic as we knew it may be at an end anyway.

28 posted on 05/10/2009 6:15:38 AM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.
Conservatives could easily make that all happen once again – if enough of them decide they really want to become aggressive at making a political difference. Absent such an effort – conservatives will have only themselves, and their personal lack of effort to blame.

Oohhhh, I get it. It's our fault! How could I have been so blind?

So, when here in Missouri we have a bona-fide conservative upstart star run for the GOP's nomination for Governor and then the part establishment pours its support and money behind one of the establishment DC 'pubbies to insure that no change takes place -that's OUR fault, right? Or how's about when a conservative unseats a liberal republican senator in PA without a vote even being cast and then the establishment scrambles to find another establishment RINO to pour its support and money behind (thus punishing the guy who affected the positive change), is that OUR fault, too, right?

Here's the deal. If the GOP continues to squash the base as it has since Bush got elected, if it continues to moderate, move to the left, spend money it doesn't have, include and protect it's sorriest and least reliable members, then what do WE do? I swore I would never vote for McCain and I had to break that oath - only to end up losing bigger. I'm not going to do it again. If the party forces us to the left again, it will lose again - at least with me.

29 posted on 05/10/2009 6:16:50 AM PDT by Chris DeWeese (http://www.firstcenturychristianity.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

saving for later


30 posted on 05/10/2009 6:21:46 AM PDT by BlueStateBlues (Blue State business, Red State heart........Palin 2012, can't come soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.
this is a long and ‘windy’ post

Yeah and you think you can just apologize and it will all be okay? you can say what you like and as long as you want with no regard for our feeeelings? Like an apology is some kind of license to abuuuse us? What kind of monster ARE you???

31 posted on 05/10/2009 6:23:02 AM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (It's all resistance...and it's all good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.
To whom it may concern

Months after "Obama" reveals his FIRST name he reveals the date he will detonate the bomb.

Months after "Obama" reveals his FIRST name (1) he reveals the date he will detonate the bomb. (2)

Notes
(1) "Obama" reveals his FIRST name, October 2008
http://end-times-hoaxes.blogspot.com/2008/10/real-october-surprise-it-was-already.html

(2) Using the anti-bible format. But the question is: will his masters still have enough time to do it?

32 posted on 05/10/2009 6:50:16 AM PDT by VlPu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.
"It is within this arena that conservatives can effectively block RINO’s from moving higher up the political ladder – by identifying them through personal contact, listening to their conversation, finding out what they believe and would like to see come to pass in future legislation. It is in this arena that you can identify the best – and help promote them toward higher office – and easily stop the worst of the worst.

Our political system and our government are illegitimate. The GOP is controlled by the same elite political class that controls the Democrat party. . "Working within the system" is counterproductive. It diverts resources; it enables the ruling elites to co-opt the forces for change. Freedom will only come from non-violent revolution. Be prepared for the violence and hatred that the political elites will use to protect their hegemony.

Obama's election proves that most Americans value the illusion of comfort over the opportunity to achieve freedom. Don't drown yourself trying to rescue those who have chosen the illusion. They will grab you and try to make your drown along with them.

The question: How do we manage a non-violent revolution that restores freedom to those who are willing to sacrifice for it? The answer is not in the realm of politics.

Mainstream media, pop culture, and consumerism have replaced religion as the opiate of the masses. Freedom and comfort cannot co-exist. Comfort is an illusion, the snake oil that politicians sell, the price of which is your freedom.

You say you want freedom? Turn off your television. Stop buying things.

33 posted on 05/10/2009 6:52:58 AM PDT by gorilla_warrior (Liberalism is a hate crime that can no longer be tolerated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chris DeWeese; Ron C.
So, when here in Missouri we have a bona-fide conservative upstart star run for the GOP's nomination for Governor and then the part[y] establishment pours its support and money behind one of the establishment DC 'pubbies to insure that no change takes place -that's OUR fault, right?

What Ron C. is saying is: Become the establishment!

Thanks Ron C. for the great post. Must reading for all FReepers.
34 posted on 05/10/2009 7:03:29 AM PDT by jellybean (Who is John Galt? ~ Bookmark http://altfreerepublic.freeforums.org for when FR is down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jellybean; Ron C.
What Ron C. is saying is: Become the establishment!

I think we have seen too many conservatives become the establishment. Can we really afford to wait another 10-15 years while we push against the wind on a local level while the hurricane of DC blows us back into our "place". From this guy's blog, I take it he is a conservative activist in Kalifornia. That does not bode well for this message.

I do think conservatives need to get involved on a local level, but this guy assumes is that we aren't doing that.

I remember a Simpson's episode many years ago where Lisa conducted an experiment. She put together a maze and at the end of the maze, she wired a piece of cheese to an electrical source. Then, she introduced a rat who got through the maze, touched the cheese, got shocked, and did not touch the cheese again. Then, Lisa wired a cupcake to an electrical source and put it on top of a book shelf. Bart then commenced to electrocute himself over, and over, and over...

35 posted on 05/10/2009 7:13:49 AM PDT by Chris DeWeese (http://www.firstcenturychristianity.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.
It is a sign of severe dysfunction when a group savages its own members for heresy instead of turning its attention toward its true enemy.

The real danger to conservatism and the country comes from the leftist Democrats, and not from RINOs or moderate Democrats. Focus on the real enemy!

36 posted on 05/10/2009 7:34:13 AM PDT by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

The biggest problem, in a general sense (and on a macro level) is that conservatives tend to be : “keep the government out of our lives”. Working in the party is seen, subconsciously, as being part of a political scene that is, for the most part, distasteful.

Again, generally, liberals/democrats are far less worried about embarrassing themselves or being aggressive at the local level or even in the culture.

We have let them take over the Media, the schools and now the government....EVEN THOUGH they are no more than half the population (and really more like 30%) The 40% who are clueless or in the middle could be talked into electing Vince McMahon President (though even he would better than Obama).

I would also say a very overlooked aspect of defining the culture or the political perception is commenting on message boards, talking locally, or on radio or continuously making comments in non political places that redefine the perception.

Eventually the Dems portrayal of Bush, the war, neo-cons etc etc took hold. It took 5-6 years, but it worked.

The drip drip drip of referring to Obama as a socialist, a Neo-Com or Neo Socialist or the like, and coming up with a few catchy representations and repeating them over and over everywhere on the internet, even in comment sections of forums has an effect over time.

Not in a spam way, but in a response.

But until the base gets motivated enough to turn into activists, we are on a slow drift. Bottom line.


37 posted on 05/10/2009 7:37:11 AM PDT by Crimson Elephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Chris DeWeese
...but this guy assumes is that we aren't doing that.

How many of us are? I'll bet a very small minority on FR attend meetings or run for/are a delegate in their state GOP. I'd love to be proved wrong, but I don't think I am or the GOP wouldn't be run by weak-kneed towers of jello.

38 posted on 05/10/2009 7:38:36 AM PDT by jellybean (Who is John Galt? ~ Bookmark http://altfreerepublic.freeforums.org for when FR is down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Ron C.

Why is this in Breaking News?


39 posted on 05/10/2009 7:40:25 AM PDT by webschooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: don-o

AMEN, don-o!


40 posted on 05/10/2009 7:40:37 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (Pres--dent 0zer0 is a train wreck. DON'T LOOK, ETHEL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Chris DeWeese
I'm not going to do it again. If the party forces us to the left again, it will lose again - at least with me.

Which is why we need to WORK! Hence this thread. You aren't seeing the forest for the trees. Welcome to FR.

41 posted on 05/10/2009 8:07:52 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (Pres--dent 0zer0 is a train wreck. DON'T LOOK, ETHEL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: jellybean

I always enjoy your posts. You are an asset to FR.


42 posted on 05/10/2009 8:09:58 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (Pres--dent 0zer0 is a train wreck. DON'T LOOK, ETHEL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan

I’ve been on FR since 2004, Elmer.


43 posted on 05/10/2009 8:12:53 AM PDT by Chris DeWeese (http://www.firstcenturychristianity.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: expatpat

Enemy? We’re all Americans. Democrats (especially these days) are taking us down the the very wrong path but they still think they’re doing the right thing. Misguided and wrong but they’re still Americans.

2006 and 2008 were disasters for Republicans and Conservatives mostly because too many stayed home or voted third party. That gave us what we have today so how did it help?

Motivated conservatives can sway the mushy “independents” and “moderates.” That is what Reagan did. Last election the mushy middle bought the hopey-changey drivel. Couple that with all-or-nothing conservatives staying home or voting third party and here we are. That’s the FACT.


44 posted on 05/10/2009 8:18:05 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (Pres--dent 0zer0 is a train wreck. DON'T LOOK, ETHEL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Chris DeWeese

Why does your signup say 2008? And even if you were, does that give your opinion more weight.

Get over yourself.


45 posted on 05/10/2009 8:19:17 AM PDT by Fudd Fan (Pres--dent 0zer0 is a train wreck. DON'T LOOK, ETHEL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan
Why does your signup say 2008? And even if you were, does that give your opinion more weight.

Instead of just hovering your mouse on my screen name, try clicking it. And no, it doesn't give my opinion more weight. In fact, when folks bust out the "newbie" bit here on FR, it infuriates me because it assumes that the day people signed up here is the day they joined the fight.

Get over yourself.

Done. Years ago.

46 posted on 05/10/2009 8:29:02 AM PDT by Chris DeWeese (http://www.firstcenturychristianity.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Chris DeWeese
I think we have seen too many conservatives become the establishment.

Really?

If one wants conservative government established, then one obviously needs many conservatives becoming the establishment.

47 posted on 05/10/2009 8:30:02 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
If one wants conservative government established, then one obviously needs many conservatives becoming the establishment.

What I meant by that is how the republicans became the "establishment" once they attained the majority in both houses. You know how conservatives go to DC and come home "moderates"?

48 posted on 05/10/2009 8:32:25 AM PDT by Chris DeWeese (http://www.firstcenturychristianity.net)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Fudd Fan
Thanks! I enjoy your posts as well.

I always thought my posts were kind of lame. I have touble writing down my thoughts. Much easier to speak what I'm thinking.

49 posted on 05/10/2009 8:35:30 AM PDT by jellybean (Who is John Galt? ~ Bookmark http://altfreerepublic.freeforums.org for when FR is down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Chris DeWeese; jellybean
Really? If one wants conservative government established, then one obviously needs many conservatives becoming the establishment.

What I meant by that is how the republicans became the "establishment" once they attained the majority in both houses. You know how conservatives go to DC and come home "moderates"?

Of course that's what you meant, now why don't you address what the poster meant. More cosnervatives becoming part of "the establishment!" I would think means that more real conservatives should become part of the establishment and not just the phoney politicians who claim to be conservative.

50 posted on 05/10/2009 8:53:28 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 301-315 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson