Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution removing presidential term limit
Thomas ^ | June 15, 2009 | Rep. SERRANO NY

Posted on 06/15/2009 9:28:30 AM PDT by lqcincinnatus

HJ 5 IH

111th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. J. RES. 5 Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 6, 2009 Mr. SERRANO introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States to repeal the twenty-second article of amendment, thereby removing the limitation on the number of terms an individual may serve as President.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

`Article--

`The twenty-second article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States is hereby repealed.'.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 0bama; 111th; agenda; antichrist; bho44; bhofascism; communism; congress; constitution; democrats; democratscongress; dictator; donttreadonme; fascism; hjres5; kingobama; obama; progressives; second100days; totalarianism; tyranny; zero
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: exit82
..and then can we have Palin forever?

Sort of like Englands queen whatsername who ruled over their best times.

21 posted on 06/15/2009 9:36:09 AM PDT by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: lqcincinnatus

Right. 3/4 of the states are SURE to ratify this! LOL!


22 posted on 06/15/2009 9:36:20 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lqcincinnatus

In a word .............. NO.


23 posted on 06/15/2009 9:36:32 AM PDT by scooter2 (IMPEACH OBAMA NOW !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lqcincinnatus

This is not news. This is thrown out all the time. It is always said it will never pass because a large amount of states have to retify it.


24 posted on 06/15/2009 9:37:02 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lqcincinnatus

King O thinks he has found a lifetime job.


25 posted on 06/15/2009 9:37:19 AM PDT by taxtruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lqcincinnatus

Whadja expect suckers—egg in yer beer?

Hail the king—long live da king

It’s good ta be king, ya know!


26 posted on 06/15/2009 9:37:59 AM PDT by gunnyg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lqcincinnatus

If any amendment should be talked about in regards to term limits then it should be to get people like Kennedy, Kerry, Byrd, and a host of other professional politicians out of there, not allow any idiots to remain longer.

The Dems know a third term could have happened under Clinton, personally I don’t think Obama will have the ratings to go even two, much less more.

This is for them further down the road I think, long term strategy for when all this dole they are peddling hooks people with a dependence monkey on their back.


27 posted on 06/15/2009 9:38:00 AM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ryan71

Both House and Senate! And don’t forget the courts.


28 posted on 06/15/2009 9:38:53 AM PDT by b4its2late (I love defenseless animals, especially in a good gravy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

I agree see my last post.Obama will get on TV like he is right now and promote it like he is Obamacare and the antichristfalsemessiah may get every damn radical marxist thing he wants.


29 posted on 06/15/2009 9:39:20 AM PDT by Dubya-M-DeesWent2SyriaStupid!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: lqcincinnatus
Two terms were enough for Washington and more than enough for Franklin Roosevelt. We learned our lesson once which is why the 22nd amendment was put into place.
30 posted on 06/15/2009 9:39:23 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, Chrysler and GM are what Marx meant by the means of production.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lqcincinnatus
But what if a Republican wins the next election? Will there be stipulations to make this only possible for Democrats?
31 posted on 06/15/2009 9:39:30 AM PDT by Dixie Yooper (Ephesians 6:11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lqcincinnatus

It will never happen. Even if passed, people get sick of the President after eight years. The majority of two term presidents are involved in nonsense type stuff that keeps them from their jobs. Nixon had Watergate, Reagan had Iran Contra, Clinton had Monicagate, and Bush had the firinggate. Most of them are nonsense but still disruptive to getting their job done. Can you imagine three terms??? Most would be in jail or six feet underground from the stress.


32 posted on 06/15/2009 9:40:18 AM PDT by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mysterio; All

Personally I’m in favor of a 1 six year term..


33 posted on 06/15/2009 9:41:08 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Can't Stop the Signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lqcincinnatus

Never happen.


34 posted on 06/15/2009 9:41:09 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exit82

I second that!


35 posted on 06/15/2009 9:41:22 AM PDT by Tigercap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MaestroLC

This will never get 2/3 of Congress and 3/4 of the states to ratify it.

The 22nd amendment was passed after FDR was elected four times. I don’t know the party vote breakdown at that time, but to get the 2/3 in Congress and 3/4 of states, there must have been a significant number of FDR’s fellow Democrats who didn’t want to see any other president be elected multiple times like that.

To bring up this amendment now seems like rank political opportunism. It’s hard to see any Republicans go along with it, since the intent is that Obama be president for life with this amendment.


36 posted on 06/15/2009 9:41:26 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Principled
Yes, and we will never elect a Marxist president, nationalize the banks, GM will never fail, the dollar will be the currency of the world, and we will never treat prisoners of war as common criminals.
37 posted on 06/15/2009 9:41:46 AM PDT by lqcincinnatus (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce

“...It’s really hard to amend the Constitution....”

Zer0 could amend the Constitution by Executive Order. He has the power of the pen. He is The Messiah. He can do anything he wants. (/s)


38 posted on 06/15/2009 9:41:46 AM PDT by NCC-1701 (ON 1-19-09 GAS WAS, ON AVERAGE IN MEMPHIS, $1.43 A GALLON.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce
If they want to mess around with amendments, they should pass a balanced budget amendment.

Or one that requires a President to produce a birth certificate.

39 posted on 06/15/2009 9:41:53 AM PDT by NJRighty (Under President B. Hussein 0bama, will the stars and stripes be replaced by a hammer and sickle?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Tzimisce; All

Thank goodness it is..


40 posted on 06/15/2009 9:42:12 AM PDT by KevinDavis (Can't Stop the Signal!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson