Skip to comments.Unveiled! Hawaii's 1961 long-form birth certificates
Posted on 07/28/2009 7:34:23 PM PDT by pissant
click here to read article
See post #271 for another short form with 4-digit year.
Since at least the time of Malthus, that occupation has been in disrepute.
It’s interesting, but how much effort do you think that State and Hospital authorities ought to or actually do put in to ensuring that babies are numbered sequentially? Is there any compelling interest in doing so? The cert. numbers, IMO, are only useful as unique identifiers.
Doesn’t seem like a smoking gun, but if this were a court proceeding in an important trial, there might well be a question on this topic asked of a witness.
I’ve only read the thread to your post, so someone may have already replied later in the thread with the answer I’m about to give.
Typically, libraries microfiche newspapers for archival purposes.
Someone in Hawaii could research your hunch easily enough.
START...PAGING HAWAIIAN FREEPERS...REPORT TO YOUR DUTY STATION AT ONCE...STOP
Why has HE seen the BC and none of us?
"A close examination of the birth certificates issued by Kapi'olani to the Nordyke twins shows the registration number precedes the number given Obama, even though the future president was born a day earlier."
O’Reilly will be as impervious to facts about Obama’s birth certificate as he was to facts about John Kerry’s service in Vietnam.
He has it in his mind that the birth certificate issue is a fantasy of the far right and that to even entertain the thought that Obama is not playing straight on this issue would compromise his cherished “Fair & Balanced” persona.
I was skeptical about the whole issue myself until I saw the supposed certificate that Obama put on his website as proof. Without even comparing it to an original I could tell it was a photoshop production (I work with that program every day). After comparing it to hi-res scans posted on the net of real certificates of live birth, there is no objective way not to be suspicious.
O’reilly either has no one on his staff familiar with photoshop, and/or has not compared what he has seen with the other legit certificates. If he has something better than what has been shown to the rest of us, he should post a hi-res version on his website.
I won’t hold my breath though.
its not a smoking gun. rather it is one of a long string of problems with the evidence presented. for example remember the newspaper clipping that purported to show o was born in 1961. -— Not one of the elements of that newspaper clipping was true. O’s parents weren’t married. They didn’t live at the address named. O wasn’t born at the hospital mentioned.
No problem .. their heads are spinning .. ;)
Let’s not forget that anyone can post a birth announcement and grandparents will often do so in the parents hometown. The announcement is a red herring and worthless for corroboration.
In the months before the election, it was obvious that O’Reilly was pro-0bama. I don’t know if he was bribed, or if he just lost his mind, but it was obvious something was up. O’Reilly refused to believe that 0bama should be tainted by attending Jeremiah Wright’s crazy ranting “church” for 20 years, he constantly poo-poohed 0bama’s relationship with terrorist Bill Ayers, he constantly went on about how smart and articulate 0bama is. The list goes on and on.