Kenyan document ignites firestorm over authenticity (Let's Discuss Bomford HERE)

WND ^ | 8/4/09 | Staff

[pissant]

A document unveiled by a California attorney in her quest to determine President Obama's place of birth has been condemned as a forgery by critics who deride as nonsense the challenges that have been raised to the president based on the U.S. Constitution's demand that the Oval Office occupant be a "natural born" citizen.

But those on the other side, who would like to see the original documentation of Obama's birth place revealed, say there are factors that indicate the Kenyan birth document could be real.

WND reported when the document was submitted to a California court by California attorney Orly Taitz, who has managed several of the high-profile cases challenging Obama's eligibility to be president.

Then yesterday, Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., raised the dispute to the floor of that august body, protesting in a speech added to the Congressional Record that the dispute was not worth one minute of time.

[PA Engineer]

Thanks for the ping. Am following a spree shooting right now in Pittsburgh. Will join the thread in a bit.

[potlatch]

Yes, constantly something new.

[GLDNGUN]

No such country. The Republic of Kenya was not proclaimed until December 1964.

Absolute BS! Why are you regurgitating something what de-bunked about 1000 times over the past 2 days. Numerous newspaper articles from 1963 were posted in which the country was ID'd as "the republic of Kenya".

[Eagles6]

Don’t put too much faith in it. Could be a red herring by the alinskys, they think deep and they’ve got the ball for the moment. Then again...

[Manic_Episode]

"The certificate is a blatant forgery. It is dated 17 February 1964 and was supposedly issued by the "Republic of Kenya". No such country. The Republic of Kenya was not proclaimed until December 1964. "

======================================

OMG!! Why has no one discussed this yet!!!

[pissant]

I don’t know, but if they used Bomford’s “BC” as the template, as the state run media has proclaimed, they would have had to blot out the original folds.

[comebacknewt]

If those two posts are true, then the story has new life. Could be that those two posters are just disrupting though.

If the document is legit, someone should be able to verify it easily given the specifics involved. Until that time, however, I'm maintaining a healthy dose of skepticism.

[FourtySeven]

I don’t trust any images anymore.

Let’s see the REAL thing.

[dalight]

They don’t. But if you are going to use an online doc to create a replica, then you would need to digitally remove the folds of the “original”.

1.) This subject has been killed in other threads, why start over.

Bomford is a fraud and too cute by half and again.

2.) the Kenyan BC has been examined by a Document Examiner and found I am supposing not to be printed with a laser jet or an ink jet printer, we can't say the same about Bomford.

3. In Mega-thread Jr. the provenance of Bomford was traced to someone perfectly capable of this fraud

4. The image in question was not cached with this site for the previous 2 year, it suddenly appeared days ago.

It is insane that someone would choose this specific Australian BC as the template to forge a Kenyan BC, the "finder" tells a tale of looking all over the net.. and happening to find the one and only digital image that exactly matches the Kenyan BC! This is absurd. Add the fact that the forger then kept many details the same to make sure that Bronson was identifiably identical to the Kenyan B.C. when these could have been easily changed as in the crest and you get .. too cute by half. This is a plant intended to be used just as it is, to sow disinformation.

Why do this to counter an obvious fraud? Enough.

[GLDNGUN]

"The certificate is a blatant forgery. It is dated 17 February 1964 and was supposedly issued by the "Republic of Kenya". No such country. The Republic of Kenya was not proclaimed until December 1964. " ====================================== OMG!! Why has no one discussed this yet!!!

Please, please tell me you simply forgot the "end sarcasm" tag.

Pretty please?

[Red Steel]

I’ll sit back and mostly watch this thread and see you do your thing. ;-)

[pissant]

LOL. Or maybe dropped off by Calypso Louie’s mothership

[BARLF]

Excellent!

Thanks Potlatch

[Frantzie]

Sorry to go off topic but did anyone record Phil Berg on Savage tonight? I missed about the last 10 minutes. I will check youtube.

Savage gave him a half hour plus Orly was on the other night.

[pissant]

Because we need a thread on Bomford, as some have suggested. Divorced from the 2000 post. And you just contributed, so thanks.

[Manic_Episode]

Spose I should've but didn't believe it was necessary.

I've read every single post on the long thread and am losing a bit of patience with the day late and dollar short crowd.

[Electric Graffiti]

Thanks Pissant.....speaking of the folds, many here have noticed the form 'type' does not distort or bend on many of the folds in the Bomford scan:



The Deputy Registrar type over the signature struck me as mighty peculiar ;)



If you take Deputy Registrar part of the Bomford B.C. and enlarge it up to 600 percent. You can clearly see the entire block outline of that particular layer in contrast to the surrounding pixels. This doesn't show the blocking that well, but you can clearly see it if you play around with it in photoshop. They tried to help out the "S". They just forgot the "D"(Which is not shown here..see above). They were on a limited timetable;)



Have at it......

[eeriegeno]

Why do this to counter an obvious fraud? Enough.

Because the Joker won't reveal his real COLB?????

[potlatch]

[Or maybe dropped off by Calypso Louie’s mothership]

No, it’s the CHICKEN POD PEOPLE! Watch out for your neighbor!!