Posted on 08/25/2009 2:47:30 PM PDT by AJMCQ
Back in October of 2008, when the subject of Obama’s Constitutional eligibility to be president of the United States was just a blip on the radar screen of public awareness, I wrote an article about how easy it was to find my then -92-year-old mother’s birth certificate.
Frankly, I didn’t think finding my mother’s birth certificate was possible, given the fact that she had been born in a farmhouse in Storrs, CT, along with nine of her 10 siblings, to parents who didn’t speak English. Despairing that she would never be “qualified” to receive the care [in a nursing home} that she desperately needed, I set about to find the document, which I was sure had vanished in the unreliable record-keeping of 1913. When I called the third number, I explained to the woman who answered the phone that I was “asking something impossible.” I gave her my mother’s first name and her father’s last name. Within four minutes, she said, “Here it is!” When I expressed my amazement, the woman said: “That’s nothing…we’re routinely asked to find birth certificates from the 1800s, and we do that all the time!” Total time it took me to find my mother’s 1913, born-in-a-farmhouse birth certificate: 10 minutes!
(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...
0bama’s Noelani Kindergarten records are oddly missing from the the State of Hawaii Department of Education.
This is an important feature because K-records for original school entry would have contained the following:
1. His REAL Birth Certificate.
2. An application with the following:
—1. His Legal name.
—2. Parents or Legal Guardians’ names.
—3. Date of Birth
—4. Place of Birth
—5. Vaccination Records (revealing a timeline to the place and DOB.)
It also is important for two reasons:
A. The Dept. of Education does not “lose” the records of one particular student. (Who paid whom what sum to make this record disappear?)
B. There would have been NO shameful low-test scores, NO embarrassing Equal Opportunity advancements, and NO trails of fraudulent funding to hide which could possibly ‘excuse’ the quashing of public school Kindergarten entry records.
For the rest of his life he attended very expensive private schools and has had his records legally sealed to deny the public, his true life story.
This is different. Hawaii should be able to verify he attended their school since he is featured in class photographs. State and federal tax dollars paid for his initial year of education. Why is there no documentation?
This is the ‘tip of the iceberg’ of an intentionally erased life of a fraudulent conman and it reeks of complicity by officials within the State of Hawaii’s Dept. of Health & Dept. of Education
Who Is Behind Quashing the Birth Certificate Issue?
Excellent article by Joan Swirsky. It’s going up in Investigating Obama, after people get a good look at the Jeff Head posting.
The cover up of 0bama’s life is so sweeping it is amazing.
Hebrews 7:3
Without father, without mother, without descent, having neither beginning of days, nor end of life; but made like unto the Son of God...
Yes I already knew all that. But I still think it needs someone else to do it.
“The court must affirm natural-born citizenship or our constitution will likely have been amended by precedence.” No, what it will in fact mean is that the Constitutional contract has been abrogated by the federal oligarchy, usurping we the people and relegating US to tax serfs subject to the democrat oligarchy ... a fascist oligarchy about to pass into law two bills which will finally destroy the old republic. Cap&Tax is designed to give the oligarchy complete controll over energy productiona dn use, and the Obamacare bill is designed to crash the eceonomy while forcing eveyone but the oligarchs under a government dictated life and death ‘healthcare’ regime. Neither of these bills was written by the actual elected representatives, just promoted by the reps. The Stimulus wasn’t written by elected representatives either, they just took what Apollo sent to them and wrote it inot a ghastly 1000+ page bill which no one had time to read and debate. Face it, the rule of law is no longer based upon the Constitutional contract, it is based upon majority opinion as dictated by democrat party presumption.
Agreed. It’s possible to fault Orly Taitz for making small errors in spelling or in legal language and procedures. But she has done more than any of the other lawyers involved to keep this issue alive and before the public.
Just because she has given so much to pursuing this issue doesn’t stop others from pursuing it. In fact, as others have said before now, the more paths we pursue in fighting for the truth and against Obama’s lies, the better. It is possible to walk and chew gum at the same time. It is possible to oppose Obama Care or Porkulus and also keep stating that it is simply WRONG that Obama refuses to release his real birth records or any of his other records.
He is hiding something big, something deadly to his political ambitions. There can be no doubt about that.
Writer James Lewis asks: “How do we fight Obama and his psychopathic lust for power?”...and answers: “You fight evil by exposing it.””
Indeed, we need to step up the investigations of him.
TY, excellent article.
The overarching constitutional question of whether or not Obama is a "natural born citizen" takes precedence over whatever privacy protection Obama may ordinarily enjoy under Hawaii law. The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land (Art. VI, Par. 2) and Hawaiian statutes are inferior to it in instances like this when the results conflict. By refusing to release information bearing on Obama's constitutional eligibility, the relevant Hawaiian executive officials - from Gov. Lingle on down - are perjuring themselves, as they have sworn an oath to uphold that US Constitution. In addition, as LucyT pointed out, some of these these Hawaiian officials may be corrupt, which would be a crime as well.
That is the question.
The overarching constitutional question of whether or not Obama is a "natural born citizen" takes precedence over whatever privacy protection Obama may ordinarily enjoy under Hawaii law. The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land (Art. VI, Par. 2) and Hawaiian statutes are inferior to it in instances like this when the results conflict. By refusing to release information bearing on Obama's constitutional eligibility, the relevant Hawaiian executive officials - from Gov. Lingle on down - are perjuring themselves, as they have sworn an oath to uphold that US Constitution. In addition, as LucyT pointed out, some of these these Hawaiian officials may be corrupt, which would be a crime as well.
Nor is it a vice. (To more accurately paraphrase Barry Goldwater!)
Please see also my post # 51.
“...come to think of it, who exactly paid for his stint at the Harvard Law School? What role did Obama’s long-time friend, Khalid al-Mansour, a key advisor to a Saudi billionaire, play? Writer Kenneth Timmerman describes al-Mansour as “well known within the black community as a lawyer, an orthodox Muslim, a black nationalist, an author, an international deal-maker, an educator, and an outspoken enemy of Israel.” This is not to omit that al-Mansour was originally contacted to intervene with Harvard on Obama’s behalf by Percy Sutton, former Manhattan Borough President and the lawyer of Malcolm X. Ah…the tangled web of it all!...”
Khalid al-Mansour a.k.a. Don Warden
http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/obama_sutton_saudi/2008/09/...
...in the lengthy interview, al-Mansour confirmed that he frequently spoke on university campuses, including Columbia, where Percy Sutton suggested he met Obama in the late 1980s, and confirmed his close relationship with Prince Alwaleed....
...Although many Americans have never heard of Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour (his full name), he is well known within the black community as a lawyer, an orthodox Muslim, a black nationalist, an author, an international deal-maker, an educator, and an outspoken enemy of Israel....
...his writings and books are packed with anti-American rhetoric reminiscent of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Obama’s disgraced former pastor.... In a 1995 book, “The Lost Books of Africa Rediscovered,” he alleged that the United States was plotting genocide against black Americans.... The first “genocide against the black man began 300 years ago,” ... while a second “genocide” was on the way “to remove 15 million Black people, considered disposable, of no relevance, value or benefit to the American society.”..
In the 1960s,
...he was known as Donald Warden,when he founded the African American Association in the San Francisco Bay area,... According to the Social Activism Project at the University of California at Berkley, Warden, a.k.a. Khalid al-Mansour, was the mentor of Black Panther Party founder Huey Newton and his cohort, Bobby Seale....
Percy Sutton, a former lawyer for Malcolm X and a former business partner of al-Mansour,
...says he was raising money for Obama’s graduate school education, al-Mansour was representing top members of the Saudi Royal family seeking to do business and exert influence in the United States. In 1989, for example — just one year after Obama entered Harvard Law School — The Los Angeles Times revealed that al-Mansour had been advising Saudi billionaires Abdul Aziz and Khalid al-Ibrahim in their secret effort to acquire a major stake in prime oceanfront property in Marina del Rey, Calif., through “an elaborate network of corporate shells in California, the Caribbean and Europe.” ...
Video at the bottom : Percy Sutton Reveals Association Between Khalid al-Mansour and Obama at Age 25
http://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/obama_sutton_saudi/2008/09/...
(2 dead links.)
Percy Sutton (Malcom X’s Lawyer) Says Barack Obama Knows And Was Financed By The Racist Radical Muslim And Saudi Advisor Dr. Khalid Al-Mansour, Part II
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIVO8MZYXo8
Quote
“The citizenship of someone who has reached the point of running for president of the United States is not really an issue.”
Neil Abercrombie
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2278969/posts?page=227#227
__________________________
Canada Free Press
JB Williams
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999
(snip)
Every member of the Supreme Court, every member of congress, every member of the Joint Chiefs, most members of the DOD, CIA, FBI, Secret Service and state run media, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, PBS, NPR, MSNBC, Fox and print news, knows that Barack Hussein Obama does NOT meet Article II – Section I constitutional requirements for the office he holds. By his own biography, there is NO way he can pass the test. The hard evidence is so far beyond overwhelming, it is ridiculous.
(snip)
But not ONE member of America’s most powerful people will dare confront Obama and his anti-American cabal on the subject. The Constitution does NOT stand.
(snip)
Half of the people you expect to stop this insanity are quiet co-conspirators in the silent coup. The other half is paralyzed by fear, motivated only by political self-preservation.
(Snip)
Americans keep asking what they can do because they see that none of their leaders are doing anything to stop the demise of their beloved country. It’s the right question, because those leaders are NOT going to stop this thing.
(Snip)
WHO WILL SAVE FREEDOM?
A brave few… This is how it was in the beginning, how it has always been and how it will be.
(Snip)
DR. ORLY TAITZ, Phil Berg and Gary Kreep, ALL OF WHOM HAVE MADE DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE A PERSONAL AMBITION, IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY CONSTITUTION LEADERSHIP.
(Snip)
A PRECIOUS FEW, BUT THEY EXIST… and the walls are indeed closing in on Obama and his evil cabal. IF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FAIL TO GET BEHIND THESE BRAVE FEW WHO ARE SEEKING PEACEFUL REDRESS, ALL THE PEACEFUL OPTIONS WILL EVAPORATE AS IF THEY NEVER EXISTED. WE WILL RETURN TO A PRE-1776 AMERICA OVERNIGHT..
Do YOU fear Obama?
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/12999
___________________________________
A precious few, indeed. Lets get behind those few brave patriots who are out there in the trenches every day working to prove Obama’s inelgibility:
REMEMBER ALINSKY’S ‘RULES FOR RADICALS:
Rule 5: Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It’s hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.
Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. “The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage.”
Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.
“One of the criteria for picking the target is the target’s vulnerability ... the other important point in the choosing of a target is that it must be a personification, not something general and abstract.”
According to Alinsky, the organizer — especially a paid organizer from outside — must first overcome suspicion and establish credibility. Next the organizer must begin the task of agitating: rubbing resentments, fanning hostilities, and searching out controversy.
.
There are many lawyers and armchair quarterbacks out there who do nothing but sit around and bloviatate, tell us what great lawyers they are, what SHOULD be done- and attack Dr. Orly Taitz. If they are so great, why don’t they get out there and DO something? Where are their clients? Where are their lawsuits?
They condemn Dr. Orly for refusing other lawyer’s help. They laugh at her and ridicule her for her ‘mistakes’. Is it any wonder she refuses their help?
And maybe, just maybe, she doesn’t want another attorney in on her work because she fears him hogging the glory when the usuper is brought down- as the egocentric, bloviating Leo Denofrio would surely do. I don’t blame her one bit on this!
Dr. Orly has put her life’s blood into this fight. SHE HAS MADE DEFENDING THE CONSTITUTION AND THE AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE A PERSONAL AMBITION, IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY CONSTITUTION LEADERSHIP FROM COWARDLY REPUBLICANS AND THE SCOTUS.
Dr. Orly is the ONLY one out there in the trenches EVERY day hitting Obama on multiple fronts and trying to bring him down. It is reported that she is more than $8,000 in debt from using her own funds for expenses in her flights across the U.S for interviews, speeches, serving papers and meeting with officials.
She has even gone to Isreal and Russia to spread the message about Obama’s inelgibility!
She states the case expertly, including the bc and natural born citizen aspect, when not abused by the U.S. state-controlled media. http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/132880
Sure, Dr. Orly makes mistakes. We all do. But Dr. Orly is no dummy. How many of us could go to a foreign country, learn 5 languages, establish a successful dental practice, a successful real estate business AND pass the California state bar- one of the hardest in the U.S. to pass?
She may be a ‘mail order’ attorney and not a Harvard lawyer, but she IS an attorney with all the rights and privilages of a Harvard lawyer nevertheless!
The point is; she has the passion, the zeal, the courage of her convictions and the love of America and its freedoms (unlike many of our ‘great’ attorneys and ‘patriots’ who criticize her) that will not let her give up!
She is exhausted. She is nervous. She is frustrated. It is reported that she gets by on 4-5 hours of sleep per night, and her family is very worried about her health- as well as her safety.
She makes mistakes. But she will NOT give up. She will keep on until she gets it right.
So let’s get behind this great little Russian refugee and great American patriot.
Stop tearing her apart. The Obots don’t need our help.
The obots are scared to death of this little lady and her determination. That’s why they come out in droves all over the net on forums, chat rooms and even the national news to attack and ridicule.
God bless this American patriot and keep her safe.
_____________________________
“Craig v. U.S. 2009 is a very clever attempt to force the court to state the definition of natural born citizen, and thus force them to look at Obama. I won’t try to explain it. Here is the pointer to Donofrio’s blog dealing with it. http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2009/08/24/craig-v-us-10th-circuit-court-of-appeals-held-08-05-2009-14th-amendment-native-born-citizens-have-no-constitutional-right-to-natural-born-citizen-status/
It was just settled a few weeks ago, and does appear to affirm that statute (laws) cannot make someone a natural born citizen, confirming the nonsense when someone invokes the 14th amendment or the 1790 Naturalization Act.”
********************
Crazy Leo is doing some Orly-esque spinning on Craig, but this is the essence of the case:
Craig was born in the U.S., which makes him, by ius solis, a common-law and CONSTITUTIONAL U.S. citizen.
He was born of two U.S. citizens, which makes him, by ius sanguinis, a STATUTORY U.S. citizen.
Therefore, Craig meets the extreme birther definition that “natural-born” = citizen by both ius solis AND ius sanguinis.
He sued in Federal court, asking to be declared a “natural-born” citizen.
The court dismissed his complaint, citing lack of court jurisdiction and lack of standing by the plaintiff.
The 10th circuit upheld the dismissal, adding that no person has the right to have his definition of “natural-born” enshrined by the courts.
The 10th circuit was basically upholding the precedent, begun when Melvin Belli’s 1964 lawsuit against Barry Goldwater got circular-filed, that courts will not hear a challenge of presidential eligibility based on one’s definition of “natural-born”. That’s what happened to Donofrio’s suit against Obama and Hollander’s and Robinson’s suit against McCain.
Which means, in essence, though not in those words, the 10th circuit upheld the definition which has been established by actual practice: “natural-born” = “citizen at birth”.
Which means that all the other lawsuits based on a definition of “natural-born” will almost certainly suffer the same fate. It’s always “possible” that a court in another circuit will take up a lawsuit and the Circuit Court of Appeals will uphold it, but only in the sense that it’s “possible” that a banjo-hitting shortstop will break Joe DiMaggio’s record.
According to JimRob, there’s a database problem they’re working on. :’)
Thanks justiceseeker93.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.