Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cpt Connie Rhodes, MD refuses deployment to Iraq until Obama’s legitimacy for CinC is verified
U.S.D.C. Western District of Texas ^ | 8/28/2009 | rxsid

Posted on 08/28/2009 8:21:55 PM PDT by rxsid

New Law suit filed in the Western District of Texas. Flight Surgeon Cpt Connie Rhodes, MD refuses to be deployed to Iraq until Obama’s legitimacy for the position of the Commander in Chief is verified Orly Taitz, Esq

Attorney & Counselor at Law
26302 La Paz ste 211
[snip]

(Application for Admission Pro Hac Vice

U.S.D.C. Western District of Texas

Submitted August 28, 2009)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Western district of Texas

CPT Connie Rhodes MD,
Plaintiff,

v.

Dr ROBERT GATES, UNITED
STATES SECRETARY OF DEFENSE,
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, de facto
PRESIDENT of the UNITED STATES,
Defendants.

APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

Plaintiff Captain Dr. Connie Rhodes has received what appear to be facially valid orders mobilizing her to active duty with the United States Army in Iraq on September 5th, 2009 (Exhibit A). Captain Rhodes is both a US army officer and a medical doctor, a flight surgeon. On May 15th of this year 501 brigade out of Fort Campbell, KY, currently stationed in Iraq, has requested a support of medical personal in Iraq. Two days ago, August the 23rd, an order was given through the chain of command via e-mail for Captain Rhodes to arrive in San Antonio TX, Fort Sam Houston for Tactical Combat Medical Care Course (TCMC) to be held from August 30th till September 4t and next day, on September the 5th to arrive in Fort Benning in Columbus GA for immediate deployment to Iraq for a period of one year and twelve days from September 5th, 2009 until September 17th 2010. Captain Dr. Connie Rhodes wants to serve her country and fulfill her tour of duty, however as a US army officer and a medical doctor she has severe reservations regarding legitimacy of Barack Obama as the Commander in Chief and repercussions of her service under his orders, particularly in light of mounting evidence of him having allegiance to other Nations and citizenship of Kenya, Indonesia and Great Britain.
...
Continued: "http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=4038"


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: article2section1; birthcertificate; birthers; certifigate; citizenship; colb; connierhodes; eligibility; ineligible; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamanoncitizenissue; orlytaitz; rhodes; taitz; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 741 next last
To: EDINVA
"But I imagine if nothing goes her way in court before 9/12, she will report to Benning and go on to Iraq rather than face court martial."

That would be sage advice if you were her legal counsel. Hopefully, she'll get that from someone and report on time. It would be criminal (pardon the pun) if she spent all those years in medical school only to have her medical license snatched from her by a conviction or dishonorable discharge.

101 posted on 08/28/2009 11:36:01 PM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

You haven’t been keeping up or reading up on the BC issue I see.

We have been going over everything you have mentioned for over a year on this board.

No Hawaii official has sworn to see a BC that shows Barry was actually born in Hawaii. Just that he has a Certificate on file. Doesn’t mean it says he was born in Hawaii.

I will ask you again, please enlighten (show and tell) us where you have seen Barry’s “Certification of Live Birth”.

He has not shown this document to any legal authority or (more importantly) to the American people.

Before you spout off about Barry and his proven Constitutional right to be President, you should read up on the facts.

Oh, if I was the betting kind of person, I would bet on her orders being rescinded or revoked. So I really don’t think this particular case will ever see the light of day.


102 posted on 08/28/2009 11:41:19 PM PDT by Aurorales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: azishot; Jet Jaguar

http://blogs.sun.com/barton808/entry/obama_in_73

link to image


103 posted on 08/28/2009 11:41:57 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (DON'T LIE TO ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
And you base that on how many years, prosecuting, defending or presiding over general courts-martial?

What I know about lawyers is that they are not all that smart as they claim to be. If you're going to ruin a career over orders what the defendant thinks are illegal, you as a fair judge, would give latitude to the defendant for discovery. And BTW, I don't give a hoot how many years you have practiced, it really doesn't mean a whole lot.

104 posted on 08/28/2009 11:43:52 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

I see you are a new FReeper.

There is a lot of info on Barry’s BC problems.
Please read up on them.

With your 25 years experience, you might be more inclined to reach out and help this Officer rather than dismiss her dedication and patriotism to our Constitution.


105 posted on 08/28/2009 11:44:37 PM PDT by Aurorales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand; Red Steel; LucyT; mojitojoe; Polarik; am; All

“Obama has a Certification of Live Birth, that at least two HI government officials have publicly stated is legitimate, including the Governor. I’m assuming that those HI officials would swear to that in an affidavit. If so, that Certification of Live Birth is prima fascia evidence of birth - it’s settled US law.”
~~~
I call BULLSHIITE on this!!!

This was proven a Fake rite here on FR by FReeper Polarik,,,

Now go peddle your O’Bammy Kool-Aid somewhere else!TROLL!.


106 posted on 08/28/2009 11:48:20 PM PDT by 1COUNTER-MORTER-68 (THROWING ANOTHER BULLET-RIDDLED TV IN THE PILE OUT BACK~~~~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Thanks, Fred Nerks.

Maybe those kids are all in a witness protection program. Why blur their faces? (shaking my head)


107 posted on 08/28/2009 11:49:13 PM PDT by azishot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Aurorales
"No Hawaii official has sworn to see a BC that shows Barry was actually born in Hawaii. Just that he has a Certificate on file. Doesn’t mean it says he was born in Hawaii."

I haven't seen anything. And, you shouldn't be so defensive when someone, in good faith, tries to explain the legal complexities of this matter, especially if those nuances don't cut your way.

The governor of HI has publicly stated that a properly kept BC is on file. Furthermore, the Director of Records in HI (or some such title) has said that Obama's Certification of Live Birth is legitimate - you can google it, I'm sure you'll find it.

What I said is - if those things are both true, and the appropriate HI official would sign an affidavit affirming those facts - then Obama has prima fascia evidence of his Hawaiian birth, and the plaintiff would have not only the burden of proof for their allegation, but they would also have an virtually insurmountable mountain to climb as the evidentiary burden would be with them as well.

If you have another legal opinion, I'm all ears. Do tell. But, stop putting words in my mouth.

108 posted on 08/28/2009 11:49:33 PM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

http://www.theobamafile.com/

a very good place to start your research.


109 posted on 08/28/2009 11:50:10 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (DON'T LIE TO ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
“Obama has a Certification of Live Birth, that at least two HI government officials have publicly stated is legitimate, including the Governor. I’m assuming that those HI officials would swear to that in an affidavit. If so, that Certification of Live Birth is prima fascia evidence of birth - it’s settled US law.”

For a lawyer, you do NOT have a very good command of the facts.

110 posted on 08/28/2009 11:51:07 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; OldDeckHand
I agree with you Red.

I don't give a “hoot” either about what most lawyers have to say on most issues.

There have been many lawyers and so-called legal experts on this board for the past year preaching to us about what is definitely going to happen with this issue.
It seems like a revolving door for lawyers.
Most of them have been dead wrong.

Someone telling me their resume to make their point, usually makes me question their knowledge on the topic.

111 posted on 08/28/2009 11:51:53 PM PDT by Aurorales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Aurorales
"With your 25 years experience, you might be more inclined to reach out and help this Officer rather than dismiss her dedication and patriotism to our Constitution."

My advice would be short and sweet, report for duty, anything else is a losing strategy and possibly malpractice. End of advice

112 posted on 08/28/2009 11:53:25 PM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

Comment #113 Removed by Moderator

To: OldDeckHand
“But, stop putting words in my mouth.”

____________________________________________

What are you talking about?
I used your words! I quoted you directly!

You did not use the word “if”.

Now you are making stuff up. Just admit you don't know what is going to happen regarding this case. And admit that you are talking about the BC issue, but obviously don't know many of the facts.

A good lawyer would read up on the facts of an issue before trying to argue their point.
You obviously haven't done that.

And yes, I am defensive. Too many know-it-all lawyers have come on here telling us that they know everything.
Most have been wrong.

Most of those lawyers and law experts after a while have disappeared.

Sometimes it is better to read a little before posting so boldly on this board how you are right and many of us are wrong.

Just saying.

114 posted on 08/29/2009 12:01:59 AM PDT by Aurorales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

What would he do if an entire Air Force Wing, a Marine, or Army Division refused deployment to Iraq until his legitimacy is verified. It would be awe crap, show me the long form Birth Certificate or get out of our Whitehouse.


115 posted on 08/29/2009 12:06:37 AM PDT by Colorado Cowgirl (God bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Actually I take it back.

Please DO NOT reach out to help this wonderful brave Officer.

You would do her no good.

You have no idea about the facts behind the reason for her defending her Constitution, and you have no intention on learning about them.

This woman needs support and legal assistance from someone who believes she is right and just in what she is doing.

You are not that person.


116 posted on 08/29/2009 12:08:58 AM PDT by Aurorales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel; Aurorales
"For a lawyer, you do NOT have a very good command of the facts. "

Apparently, I'm in great company, along with the USA Today and at least a handful of HI state officials. From the USA Today website...

""I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, director of the Hawaii State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago...."

Hawaii: Obama birth certificate is real

With that statement, and a Certification of Live Birth, Barack Obama will win any and all legal challenges, assuming that one of these cases is ever heard on the merits, which is wildly unlikely. That's just the way things work in the US legal system. The plaintiff has the burden of proof, not the defense. The plaintiff would have to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that all these people are lying, it's that simple.

Now, perhaps you have information that indicates Dr. Fukino is either an impostor, or part of Moveon.org or a space alien for that matter or maybe even USA Today fabricated the quote out of whole cloth. I don't know. But, if he's legit as well as the quote, then it's an uphill battle for any plaintiff challenging Obama.

I'm getting the feeling from our brief interaction that neither of you are people who listen to reason, so don't feel it necessary to respond. I'll take you silence as a protest of disagreement, and we'll call it a night.

117 posted on 08/29/2009 12:11:07 AM PDT by OldDeckHand (No Socialized Medicine, No Way, No How, No Time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
What I said is - if those things are both true, and the appropriate HI official would sign an affidavit affirming those facts - then Obama has prima fascia evidence of his Hawaiian birth, and the plaintiff would have not only the burden of proof for their allegation, but they would also have an virtually insurmountable mountain to climb as the evidentiary burden would be with them as well.

Insurmountable? Present the real Obama birth certificate in court not an affidavit. Hawaii issuance of birth certificates could be obtained under flimsy circumstances, which can be proven in court. A statement from a witness was all that was needed for a Hawaiian birth certificate to be issued. If this is what happened, the myth of Obama being born in a hospital would all be shattered, and the question of to where Obama was born would then become paramount.

118 posted on 08/29/2009 12:12:19 AM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: JMack
"The law is obviously not my area of expertise, so I’m just curious, what happens if Obama gives orders to commit a war crime?"

Your exactly correct! The Nuremberg trials showed that a defense of "I was only following orders" doesn't cut it. Therefore, if an officer has reason to believe that orders given to them are unlawful, they have a duty to question them. Now, that reason might be ultimately worked out in a court of law.

119 posted on 08/29/2009 12:18:04 AM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

You will take my silence as a protest of disagreement?

You have given me absolutely no time to respond!

A good lawyer would stay up a few more minutes and argue their point.

Quoting from the USA Today website? Please.
You are either a troll on this board, a Barry kool-aid drinker, or just have been living under a rock for the past year.

My suggestion is stop posting about an issue you know nothing about and either educate yourself on the Fraud we have in office or go take a big ‘ol swig of the kool-aid you have been drinking.

I guess do the one that gets you through the night.


120 posted on 08/29/2009 12:21:12 AM PDT by Aurorales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 741 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson