Posted on 09/04/2009 8:50:36 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
Once again, a NASA space probe is supporting the 6,000-year biblical age of the solar system...
(Excerpt) Read more at creation.com ...
The text is clear- as is the text that states there was no spirit death before the fall, as is the text that specifically states God breathed life into the NOSTRILS of man and woman, as is the text that states day and night- not much confussion here
You ever notice how the liberal retreads return and try the exact 'new' angle that all liberals are trying on their own far left web sites?
They hate the Bible, they have spent no time in prayerful study of the Bible, they quote the same liberal 'cliches' used by the phoneys, and they are blind to the modern anti-Bible filth movement's fanaticism and constant efforts to undermine the Bible even when they try to quote it.
It's fine if you want to believe there is a designer. There's nothing wrong with that, and science would be going outside of its area to try to disprove that. What's wrong is equating that belief with science.
Again, you get it backwards...it's true that science is limited, but God's creation is greater than science, not the other way around. God can not and will not be excluded from science because science is merely a subset of His creation, not the other way around.
See my tagline. Science will forever be subservient to God.
More copy/paste
“But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
I hope you are not including Scopes in that group.
The test also clearly states that God created both man and animals from the dust of the ground.
How that can be interpreted as meaning He used evolution without massive twisting of Scripture, or blowing it off as allegory, is beyond me.
Scripture is the truth. Anyone who believes that isn’t going to try to manipulate it to fit any pet POV they have.
Jesus wasn't self-righteous goat granny?
That's what gives the most support to the observation of being a retread, the same old, tired, worn out arguments we heard from the last patch of banned FReepers.
No...what we see is your one-sided failure of painting GGG as the bad guy.
We see you left out the posts beginning with 2, 3, 4, 5...etc. etc.
Here's an idea...liberals can stop slinging mud, handle the heat in the kitchen or just quit whining already! Your choice!
The 6th day is in fact quite defined as to how long it is as opposed to the other days which are not quite so defined as to duration/time.
We are living in the 6th Day. You, Me, everyone else ever heard of, written of, known of, lives (lived) in the 6th Day.
I am sad that you are unwilling or unable to grasp that concept.
Yes, and a “day” being 1,000 years still does not make evolutionary “deep time,” of hundreds of millions or even billions of years, compatible with Biblical Creation, Radix.
It’s what I’ve been trying to tell you since this afternoon.
Instead, you seem intent on posting links to Strong’s, as if I’m unaware of what I told you myself several hours ago.
It’s you, who doesn’t understand whay you’re reading, apparently.
The test text also clearly states that God created both man and animals from the dust of the ground.
Psalm 90:4
PS 90:4 For a thousand years in Your sight Are like yesterday when it passes by, Or as a watch in the night.
Psalm 90:4 (NASB)
- This passage is used to support that the days of creation were long periods of time. The passage makes a comparison of 1,000 years with: “yesterday” and “a watch in the night.”
- This Scripture passage contains a comparative particle in the original Hebrew to make the comparison between 1,000 years and “yesterday” and “a watch in the night.” The comparative particle is translated into English as “like” or “as.”
- The comparison is not between a day being a literal 1,000 years.
- The comparison is that a thousand years with God are like yesterday, or like a watch in the night, which is even a briefer period of time.
- The meaning of the passage is that God equates time differently from the way we equate time.
Genesis 1 is not depicting how God views time.
- The Genesis context of creation speaks of days in the sense of the creation week during which God created this world and set the measure of the week.
- Genesis 1 does not explain how time is calculated on God’s scale, but how the creation days set the norm for days in the weekly cycle of time - work six days and rest one.
- From a contextual and grammatical point of view comparing Psalm 90:4 to Genesis 1 does not work. Psalm 90 is not a creation psalm.
- Contextually speaking, Psalm 90 does not address the issue of how God regards the days of creation but how God views time.
http://www.truthnet.org/creation/creationdays/
If one is going to use scripture, use it correctly..
goat granny can you show us the scripture that says the earth is ga-jillions of years old? Better yet just happened all because...well just because? Out of sheer chance, without design, purpose or intelligence?
Since you're a stickler for "using scripture correctly", I'll also await your explanations that Jesus wasn't self-righteous too.
You’re going to have to back up your wild interpretation with something concrete.
I suggest you go to your Strong’s source code dump and get to work.
Maybe you’ll find it useful for something other than lending a false impression.
[[Sheesh, not again....]]
Lol- you need typign lessons from me- I charge $22 an hour :)
“Isn’t the sun made of burning coal?”
All those green house gases...we’re all gonna die!
“How fitting. Elmer Gantry is on the PBS station in SF about an hour from now.”
What’s fitting....Elmer Gantry coming on in a few minutes...
or liberals alerting fellow liberlas in the SF area a show is coming on on PBS?
LOL!
(I really don’t think liberals on here have the slightest clue!)
Just because 1,000 years is like a day to God, who is outside or time and not bound by it, doesn’t mean that God had to use 1,000 years every time He used the word *day* as designated by the use of the terms evening and morning.
Compared to eternal, yes, a thousand years is no different than a day, but working within time, it is a significant difference.
God used the terms of evening and morning to clarify which meaning of the word He meant by *yom*.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.