Posted on 09/29/2009 9:01:39 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
When originally endeavoring to write an approximately 800-word opinion piece on Glenn Beck, I hadn’t taken into account what a truly difficult task it would be. I’ve no desire to alienate some of my many friends on the right currently embracing Beck. But I do have this terrible habit of usually speaking my mind. Glenn Beck deserves credit for what he is doing to hurt Obama — there is no question about that. But in thinking about the man overall as a media figure today, one allegedly aligned with the right, I also have serious concerns. I tried to do my best to address the topic fairly, and I regret that so complex a topic took me almost 1,800 words.
Given the down feeling across the right after last year’s elections, it’s almost exciting to watch Glenn Beck inject a new vitality into the nation’s political discourse. Nearly every one of Beck’s shows packs the respect, depth, sincerity, and intelligence of a good joke at a funeral parlor into one uproarious hour after another. I don’t know how anyone can keep from snickering … at least a little bit. So, what’s the harm in a good joke?
The harm as I see it is that so many seem to be taking the joke seriously. But can you blame them? No, probably not. The media culture of today has done everything in its power to prevent the right from seeing a serious, effective leadership emerge on the national stage. One need only look back to the recent — in fact, ongoing — mistreatment of Sarah Palin to demonstrate that. A deeply informed and experienced radio host, Mark Levin, has broken out in the radio world with ratings that make Glenn Beck’s real numbers look like the third tier radio host he actually is. Levin also wrote a significant New York Times bestseller, moving well over a million copies by now. But there was no Time cover, no Newsweek splash, no Katie Couric interview for that. Have you ever paused long enough to ask yourself why?
Full disclosure — yes, Mark Levin has become something of a dear and trusted friend. But please don’t mistake this as carping or defense on his behalf. Mark is the last person I know who needs or wants to be defended by someone else. My opinions in this matter have nothing to do with Levin and everything to do with the future of the right and the desperate need we have of winning a large number of state and district elections in 2010. And I am not suggesting that Glenn Beck should somehow shut up, go away, or stop pointing a finger at this out-of-control leftist White House whenever he can. Let’s be clear about that. What I am suggesting is that at least some relatively small but vocal amount of people are misunderstanding why Beck is getting the media exposure that he is.
In short, the elitist media gets the joke. They are not putting him up there because they find him an effective, articulate spokesman for the right. They find him an oddity, something they can pin prick and laugh at. And consciously or not, they also know he has the potential to do tremendous damage to the right while having accomplished very little if anything much at all to help it himself. And that’s a fact. He was given a non-prominent microphone and television show in a mostly uncompetitive time slot, replacing a very decent but relatively uncompelling and beyond-his-prime John Gibson. And piggybacking on the efforts of others, Beck has displayed tremendous marketing ability, or his handlers have, in making the absolute best use of it while also doing damage to a politically dangerous White House. He deserves praise and full credit for that.
However, we should not confuse what it is and what it is not, nor lose sight of the extremely dangerous time bombs he has planted for the right as he’s gone so thoughtlessly and carelessly on his way in doing it. First some facts as to what Beck has and has not actually done in terms of damaging the Obama administration. From the 9/12 tea party march, to Van Jones, the NEA scandal, and ACORN, none of these were the genuine work of Glenn Beck. He did no heavy lifting on any of those stories other than ginning up noise around them on his show, often milking them for days while, to genuine observers, all the facts were out there for anyone of a mind to find them out. That isn’t an insult. He has a television presence and it’s good that he’s currently using it to capitalize on stories that help the right and undermine Obama. I’m not begrudging him that.
But his attempt to co-opt the tea party movement with that silly 9/12 Project nonsense that never actually caught on was the most ham-fisted and perhaps only insulting one of them all. Nine principles and 12 values? Can anyone even name them today? They were supposed to be what it was all about once. Oh well, at least one of his marketing schemes hasn’t tracked, so we do know he’s human after all. The D.C. tea party protest was always planned to come off. All Beck did was come up with a scheme to weave into it, trying to make it his, and it failed. I know because I was there. Aside from whatever more rabid fans he may have encircled himself with for his broadcast that day, nothing about 9/12 was about Glenn Beck. The movement preceded him, just as it preceded Obama, having started under Bush. And frankly, getting off one’s duff and getting involved in local or state party politics or actively joining up with the tea party movement is the only thing that’s going to help take back America and set the Republican Party right for the center-right. In that sense, Beck is a distraction, if nothing else. But he is also something far worse. He’s a genuine danger to us and we need to sort that out.
Without taking credit away from Beck for talking it up as he did, along with many, many others, the notion that 9/12 was much about Beck is a joke. The many pushing it were simply more generous in crediting the people actually involved — the little people, patriotic Americans across the country like you and me who are driving it. They stand in stark contrast to Beck, who seems to ultimately and always be about himself. As for the real meat behind the various other scandals mentioned, it was either Breitbart or blogger Gateway Pundit who did the real work on those. Beck’s great contribution was again, like others, to broadcast them. That’s a good thing. He deserves credit for that, though also unfortunately he seems so willing to make them his own. I guess that’s what so-called stars, or wannabe famous people, do.
But what else has he done? This represents my only serious concerns involving Beck. Otherwise, I doubt I’d be much interested in him at all. He’s called Barack Obama a racist, for one. I’m appalled by my friends on the right who seem so willing to pass that remark off as insignificant — almost pretending it was never said. It was outrageous, undeserved, and represents nothing but the very kind of racist cudgel the left has been falsely charging the right with being for years. Maybe Beck is one, otherwise he could never conceive of making such a remark — and so publicly at that.
I thought Barack Obama wasn’t even “really” black to many of his critics? I thought the good friend he was “pal-ing around with,” domestic terrorist Bill Ayers, was white? In fact, Obama has probably broken bread with more white people than black over the years. And forget the nuance, the rationalization around what it is he really meant or was trying to say. That doesn’t and won’t matter when the left and the media pick it back up and turn it on you, not just Glenn Beck, to call you intolerant and racist, just as they have wrongly been doing for years.
So, Beck-heads, be advised. If nothing else, don’t come crying to me about how a biased media mistreats you and calls you names you don’t deserve to be called when they tire of the right’s alleged fair-haired boy and decide to use his recklessness and lack of thought against you. And they will do it not just to you, but the entire conservative movement because he was prominently embraced and not denounced. Well, not me. And I want to be very clear and on record here. The comment was uncalled for.
And what about those internment camps? That’s a good one. When the story first broke I looked into it. It took all of an hour to read the text of the actual bill and see there was nothing to it at all. Yet somehow it took Beck, all the while stirring up his would-be masses, a month to figure it out. Really? With his supposedly dogged researchers and researching skills? Please, give me a break. So there again Beck has planted the very seed that, just as Obama’s past with ACORN is currently doing to him, is going to come back and hurt the right to a significant degree. We’ll be denounced en masse as a bunch of wild-eyed conspiracy freaks and racists. And thanks to any broad embrace of Glenn Beck and the lowest common denominator of showmanship that he represents, this time you’ll deserve it.
I understand the center-right’s frustration. For some time the Republican Party has failed us, though it does now seem to be getting on track based upon my observations here in Washington, D.C. I know how frustrating it was to watch the unfair destruction of Sarah Palin. In that sense, dare I say, I feel your pain. And I share the desperation of wanting to find someone that the media allows to stand up, to not be maligned while honestly and fairly speaking to our issues and representing our various just causes such as they are. But I refuse to accept just anyone in that role because it’s too important to me.
And I especially refuse to accept someone so reckless, uninformed, unthinking, and possibly even unserious with a very real potential to do the right more harm than good in the end.
-- Dan Riehl is a former marketing professional in the technology industry turned blogger/new media consultant. He's based in Virginia, just off the D.C. Beltway.
“Yes, but if you are trying to compare Beck with the insane SOB on Network you are goofy.”
Well, Glen Beck compares himself to the guy on NETWORK.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2350618/posts
Give us a rational, organized rebuttal to the questions and discussions Beck has presented, tell us which are untrue and what are the "real" facts, and maybe we can talk.
How it affects the GOP doesn't matter more than a bucketful of spit to me.
>Comparing the GOP and Democrats as problems is like comparing the flu and brain cancer as ‘both diseases’. The level of seriousness of what they do is not comparable.
I’d change that up a little, the Republicans could still be the flu, but Democrats AIDS. Now given that we have AIDS in control of everything is it really smart to be going out and catching the flu?
;)
>Repeat after me: There is no such thing as a conservative Democrat.
That may be true, but just because there exists a conservative Republican does not mean that all republicans are conservative.
Furthermore, can the Republican party, as a whole, be called a conservative party when they did NOTHING to point out the severe contra-Constitutionality of the retroactive AIG bonus taxation? Or the retroactive repeal of immunities granted to the telecom-industries that was being talked about?
{I wrote about the criminality of the AIG decisions here:
http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dv698tm_22dr6x3nfb
Though I definitely need to write up a piece about this proposed repeal.}
Ping! Bump! And this guy is the mental case. Beck has long denounced the idea of right or left and has since converted to the truth. The seeking of which is causing the beltway some great unease, the GOP a bit of consternation or is it constipation, and the democrats are trying to get off the Titanic.
Go Glenn Beck!
My argument was actually that while there may exist some conservative in the GOP it by no means guarantees the party to be conservative; and the included link shows how I regard the 11th Congress.
*111th, not 11th
>Thanks for that link.
You’re welcome.
>Unreal.
As in? Accurate? or not? Good reasoning? Bad? Understandable? or... well, why is it unreal?
I don’t begrudge him that...
can’t fault him for that...
not blaming him for that...I can’t fault him for that...
Well...it seems he’s doing something right!
Then there’s this...
“But what else has he done? This represents my only serious concerns involving Beck. Otherwise, I doubt I’d be much interested in him at all. He’s called Barack Obama a racist, for one. I’m appalled by my friends on the right who seem so willing to pass that remark off as insignificant — almost pretending it was never said. It was outrageous, undeserved, and represents nothing but the very kind of racist cudgel the left has been falsely charging the right with being for years. Maybe Beck is one, otherwise he could never conceive of making such a remark — and so publicly at that.”
I’m sorry, but after the zerrhoid was in a hate-whitey-fest black liberation church for 20+ years...
“typical white” person throw Momma under the bus comments...
and selecting that racist supreme court judge...
among other things...
I don’t see how anyone can come to any other conclusion!
Nah...Beck’s all right!
I agree with what you’ve said, but I guess I phrased things the way I did because everyone attacking Beck these days (with the exception of Levin) has had far, far less impact this year than Beck has, so it strikes me as anklebiting.
Showmen.
Rush himself admits it. Now I am sure he believes much of what he preaches, but he is there to generate ad revenue. Same with Beck.
Don't hold these guys up to be leaders of some sort of movement. They are not. They are in it for the money and the ego.
Another good point.
The GOP doesn’t really want to be conservative, just wants conservatives to vote for them.
They ignored Beck when he was only on the radio and HLN, but once he moved to Fox, got huge ratings and started very effectively to pick apart the Obama Myth, they started attacking....
Excellent post, bears repeating.
In a way this is what Beck said when he said McCain would have been worse than 0bama. Levin was all over him for saying that but Beck's point was that had it been McCain doing all this CRAP, republicans and yes even some conservatives wouldn't have gotten up to protest on 9-12 because it was done by a repub, and McCain wouldn't have been so heavy handed and rammed it through so quickly. [Remember the show Beck did about the frog boiling].
Beck admitted he voted for McCain and the way he worded his statement was wrong, but his point was a good one. If anything got Americans to pay attention to what's happening in Washington it was the coronation of Lord Zero and his Czars.
Beck deserves credit for putting things together and explaining them in an understandable way. The left thrives on deception, and they despise Beck for lifting the veil. I like Levin, but he doesn't have the audience Beck has.
“But what else has he done? This represents my only serious concerns involving Beck. Otherwise, I doubt I’d be much interested in him at all. He’s called Barack Obama a racist, for one. I’m appalled by my friends on the right who seem so willing to pass that remark off as insignificant — almost pretending it was never said.”
Let’s see. I’ve heard the Left accuse anyone and everyone that they dislike as being racists for, oh, the 45 years that I’ve been a political junkie.
And now I’m supposed to be all indignant because Glenn Beck is giving one of their heroes the same treatment? Here’s a thought, David Riehl: grow a pair, you useless pathetic pussy.
I think a lot of people who attack Beck do so for their own advandement, but some really just are afraid of any one person getting pegged as the “face of conservatism”. Hard to tell which is which though.
I remember when Beck was persona-non-grata around here, back in the 2008 primary days. So the cult-worship phenomena has limits.
Well said.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.