Skip to comments.Vanity: Usurper Detection Legislation Should Be Passed Within Each State
Posted on 10/30/2009 3:00:46 PM PDT by Uncle Sham
Since it appears that the judicial branch is intent on abandoning it's duty to uphold the Constitution, perhaps it's time for the states themselves to individually pass legislation that will protect their citizens from the actions of anyone who illegally occupies the Oval office.
There is nothing to prevent a state from passing a law requiring that the President must file his PROOF of meeting eligibility requirements with the state and that such a filing is open to public challenge in court.
Such a law could stipulate that any legislation signed by a President who refuses or is unable to meet this requirement to file shall be declared null and void within the borders of the state. No orders affecting any of the states citizens from such a usurper would have legal standing within the borders of the state. In addition, the act could command all legislators at the national level to institute whatever legal mechanism is required to challenge the standing of such a usurper.
It seems to me, any state-passed law that ENFORCES the Constitution would be judged as "Constitutional". Perhaps this can be done through a ballot initiative if the legislators refuse to look into it. We do not have to WAIT until the next Presidential election to handcuff a possible usurper. This can be done NOW and immediately protect a state's citizens from having to live with ILLEGALLY made legislation or orders.
Alamo Girl, What is your opinion of this concept and do you think it is obtainable in some form or fashion?
Thank You for nailing it.
If anything is "sedition" or "treason", it's got to be "usurping" the Presidency and or aiding and abetting a "usurper" to the Presidency during a time of war.
If the present person in the Oval office was legal, he would not have gone to great expense to block the disclosure of his real birth certificate and then sealed his other records, as well.
Generally though laws are not retroactive so I doubt it would be of any help to past elections. But it would help in 2012 etc.
The law I propose would go into effect the day it was passed and would not be "retroactive". It would affect all legislative and presidential executive orders occurring from the moment it became law.
Of course, if it exposed a "usurper" while in office, I'm sure that anything he signed before such a law went into effect would be challenged in other ways.
Ah, that makes sense.
Would it have more force if it was in a States’ Constitution?
I really don’t think it would matter legally. Putting such a provision in a state’s constitution would take more of an effort than just passing a state law. A law could be passed in a week.
Then charge the Birthers with Sedition.
Birther goes to court with his defense that Obama was born in Kenya and is an usurper who has gained his office by (A) False Statements under oath [We have Obama’s signed statement from Arizona during the campaign stating that he was a natural born citizen] BIG TIME SMOKING GUN (B) Obstruction of Justice (c) Criminal Conspiracy.
So bring it on. Bring the sedition charges. You are just trying to SCARE people.
I don’t scare easily.
You know, Bob Bauer, YOU will eventually wind up behind bars for this fiasco, don’t you?
And so will Judge Carter.
The True Answer to the health care fiasco Bump
Obama has never presented such proof to anybody, anywhere, anytime, anyhow.
The way he got on the ballot in fifty states is: the vast majority of the populace is as intellectually dishonest and lazy, and as willing to swallow publicity stunts (like releasing forged jpg images of forged documents) as “evidence,” as you are.
“The way he got on the ballot in fifty states is: the vast majority of the populace is as intellectually dishonest and lazy, and as willing to swallow publicity stunts (like releasing forged jpg images of forged documents) as evidence, as you are.”
So the majority need the Birthers to set the rest of us straight, right? Why, if you folks, a truly tiny minority, could just take over and rule the rest of us, things would be just fine, correct? A tiny minority ruling the rest of us because the tiny minority is so smart and we’re so dumb!
Here’s a tip; the majority might get upset with the tiny ruling minority made up of such smart Birther types.
Try responding to what I said, instead of something you wish I had said.
You asserted, falsely, that Obama had presented proof of his citizenship status to all fifty states. You did not respond to my factual statement that: Obama has never presented such proof to anybody, anywhere, anytime, anyhow.
You are wasting your time by trying to debate “Mr.Threat-Machine”. Pay him/her/it no mind. BTW, Happy New Year!
I still think this is a better approach than waiting for the next election cycle to catch a Usurper.
It all comes down to what is proof.
It all comes down to what is proof.