Skip to comments.Official Request byCongressmen to See Obama's Birth Certificate-Straw Which Breaks This Camel's Back
Posted on 12/04/2009 4:47:27 PM PST by cycle of discernment
OFFICIAL REQUEST BY CONGRESSMEN TO SEE OBAMAS BIRTH CERTIFICATE WILL BE THE STRAW WHICH BREAKS THIS CAMELS BACK
Political analysis by John Charlton
Obama's presidential campaign was hailed for its forceful imagery, but after 11 months the public has come to understand the undisputed facts about him, don't fit the requirements of the U.S. Constitution.
(Dec. 4, 2009) Georgias representative in the U.S. House, Nathan Deal announced in early November that he and 10 House colleagues were going to sign a joint letter, asking Obama to publicly reveal his birth certificate,.
The simple enough question was rebuffed and ridiculed by the Main Stream Media, and even the Savannah Morning News, as if a birth certificate was some sort of private journal or diary of past affairs.
The mere fact that the liberals and progressives ridiculed Nathan Deal whose only interest is to quiet the nation shows that they have no substantive reason to oppose the request. It further shows that they know that Obama cannot oblige Deal and his co-signatories, for in Democratic circles nothing is a secret.
What will Obama say to Nathan Deal? The answer must come soon. Deal said that he was to send his letter after Thanksgiving. Any delay on the part of Barack Hussein Obama to oblige Deal, will only further erode his political influence in Washington, D.C..
Obama has been effectively checkmated by the concerted effort of public support, publicized lawsuits on the eligibility question, publicity campaigns such as those of World Net Daily and Charles Kerchner to put the issue in the face of liberals on a constant basis, and blogs and bloggers the world over.
If Obama obliges him, then the online image of a Certificate of Live Birth (COLB) provided by his campaign will be proven a forgery, according to the consensus of opinion of citizens who have studied the images posted on the net and found some images of the allegedly same document, contain a HI State seal and some do not.
If Obama does refuses, however, it will only further confirm that he has something to hide.
Palins remark that it is a valid issue and Ogdens resignation as Deputy U.S. Attorney General in the same week, following the sending of Nathan Deals letter, appear to be diagnostic signs that the political establishment understands the risks and imminent crisis about to break. The publicity garnered by the testimony of the U.S. Marine, who goes by the nik, Race Bannon, only further tilt the Obama regime towards political implosion.
Even the pulse of Obamas political support on the net tells the tale: a lull and quiet among them posting comments at opposition blogs is noticeable. There remain only the violent, the perverse and the somewhat mad to carry on the cheers of Change, which were the mind numbing drum beat of the Obama for American campaign, just 14 months ago.
The political momentum of the nation now follows diverse roads to the same destination, and the resulting fireworks are going to be much brighter and invigorating than those of any Fourth of July in many a year!
LMAO... it’s been decades since I paid to get a good shine.
Is this Post and Email site dependable? I don’t know much about them.
FINGERS CROSSED THOUGH!!
Not as pathetic as your ping list.
From your home page. Did you forget?
I don’t disagree with this thread. And I didn’t summon a cheering squad to disrupt discussion. I pinged some freepers to discuss the possibility of invoking executive privilege and the implications of Cheney’s not asking for objections at the electoral vote certification.
I have never seen anyone try so hard to convince people that you are a conservative as that of which is on you home page...still chuckling at that too
The one on the internet was a computer printout. The long form is the one that contains actual handwriting and signatures. I dont think that one has been seen by anyone in the public, has it?
As evidenced by the posts to me thus far on this thread, birthers are incapable of polite discussion with those with whom they disagree. So I’ve given up trying where they’re concerned. They always resort to personal attacks.
I’ve had more productive and extremely polite exchanges with libtards at other sites on this issue than with this group. I’m happy to simply not have discussion with your group, but y’all just can’t help yourselves. It’s pathetic.
Then I will probably think that I have been wrong.
Not to my knowledge.
Ogdens resignation as Deputy U.S. Attorney General in the same week, f
I would think that an ethical DOJ attorney would simply say, “Provide the documents showing you are a natural born citizen. Don’t waste my time or the taxpayers’ money.”
Is this why Ogden resigned? Is he being asked to defend the indefensible?
Then Obama will find his administration in jeopardy of ending.
Very, very funny.
“So what if that is released and contains no irregularities?
The issue will go away, but it will be harmful to
Obammie for thumbing his nose for so long.
My contention has always been:
1. He does not have a BC, because he was born outside of a hospital, or, he was NOT born in Hawaii.
2. He has one, but it contains embarrassing information, such as father’s name.
His best out is to say that it was a home birth.
The whole issue is very strange, but I am leaning on the
side of those that believe he is NOT a US citizen.
Well then, it wouldnt be the same one that was previously posted on the internet.
They have played a shell game with the real BC, and it is a transparent game at that.
In spite of the fact that they have managed to keep it out of view thusfar, they really havent fooled all of the people all of the time have they?
I was thinking of Senator Grassley’s requests for documentation from the WH regarding Walpin’s firing. Was the WH not obligated to respond on some level? I know they began negotiations with him and his staff about what they would provide.
As far as the ruling is concerned, I was thinking about how that might play out should the issue be escalated to that point.
There were no questions surrounding the president’s qualifications in 2005. So I wouldn’t expect anything different. I don’t know why, but I was under the impression that the written objections could only be submitted if and when Cheney asked for objections. Is there a process beforehand to submit objections?
If Obama does this, then the issue will continue to fester and **will** likely become a full blown infection **long** before the next election.
Polls show that 51% of Republics do not even believe he was born here. The percent would be higher if the respondents had been asked if it was impossible to know or if they had doubts.
I doubt that Obama can do any kind of massage therapy on those kinds of numbers. This will blow up in his face.
( By the way, I am among those who claim that given the evidence it is impossible to know for a certainty if Obama was born in the U.S. We do know his father was Kenyan and British and I personally would like a Supreme Court clarification of that issue.)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.