Skip to comments.The Yemeni Koran
Posted on 12/14/2009 5:55:25 AM PST by SJackson
Explosive ramifications result from new evidence revealing the Muslim holy book has undergone a textual evolution
Frontpage Interviews guests today are Robert Spencer and Moorthy Muthuswamy.
Moorthy Muthuswamy is an expert on terrorism in India. He grew up in India, where he had firsthand experience with political Islam and jihad. He moved to America in 1984 to pursue graduate studies. In 1992, he received a doctorate in nuclear physics from Stony Brook University, New York. Since 1999 he has extensively published ideas on neutralizing political Islams terror war as it is imposed on unbelievers. He is the author of the new book, Defeating Political Islam: The New Cold War.
Robert Spencer is the director of Jihad Watch, a program of the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He is the author of nine books on Islam and Jihad, a weekly columnist for Human Events and Frontpagemag.com, and has led numerous seminars for the U.S. military and intelligence communities. He is the author of the new book, The Complete Infidels Guide to the Koran.
FP: Moorthy Muthuswamy and Robert Spencer, welcome to Frontpage Interview.
Id like to talk to both of you today about the Yemeni Koran.
Moorthy Muthuswamy, lets begin with you. Tell us about this Yemeni Koran and what it signifies.
Muthuswamy: Thank you for the opportunity, Jamie. First, some background.
In 1972, during the restoration of the Great Mosque of Sanaa, in Yemen, a gravesite containing a mash of old parchment pages was discovered. It became clear that this parchment hoard is an example of what is sometimes referred to as a paper grave. In this case, the site was the resting place for tens of thousands of fragments from close to a thousand different parchment codices of the Koran, the Muslim holy book.
Using a technique called carbon dating, some of the parchment pages in the Yemeni hoard were dated back to the seventh and eighth centuries, or Islams first two centuries. Until now, three ancient copies of the Koran were said to exist. One copy in the Library of Tashkent in Uzbekistan, and another in the Topkapi Museum in Istanbul, Turkey, date from the eighth century. A copy kept in the British Library in London dates from the late seventh century. But the Sanaa parchment pages are even older. Moreover, these pages are written in a script that originates from the Hijazthe region of Arabia where the prophet Muhammad purportedly lived. This makes the Yemeni Korans not only the oldest to have survived, but one of the earliest copies of the Koran ever.
In 1981, the first scientific undertaking to study the Yemeni Koran was initiated by a group headed by Gerd-R. Puin, a specialist in Arabic calligraphy and Koranic paleography based at Saarland University, in Saarbrücken, Germany. Puin and his group recognized the antiquity of some of the parchment fragments. Their preliminary inspection revealed unconventional verse orderings, minor textual variations, and rare styles of orthography and artistic embellishment. Interestingly, some of the sheets were also palimpsestsversions very clearly written over even earlier, washed-off or erased versions.
To quote Puin: So many Muslims have this belief that everything between the two covers of the Koran is just Gods unaltered word They like to quote the textual work that shows that the Bible has a history and did not fall straight out of the sky, but until now the Koran has been out of this discussion. The only way to break through this wall is to prove that the Koran has a history too. The Sanaa fragments will help us to do this.
The idea that the Koran is the literal Word of God, perfect, timeless, and permanent, is crucial to Islam, in particular, to the Islamists at the forefront of spreading sharia and jihad. However, some of the Sanaa fragments revealed small but intriguing aberrations from the standard Koranic text. Indeed, this evidence compels one to conclude that the Muslim holy book has undergone a textual evolution rather than simply the Word of God as revealed in its entirety to the Prophet Muhammad in the seventh century.
This explosive ramification has made the State of Yemen reluctant to give further access to the Sanaa fragments. Fortunately, before the door was shut to Western scholars, another German academic, Graf von Bothmer, made 35,000 microfilm pictures of the fragments, which remain at the University of the Saarland.
FP: Robert Spencer, so the Yemeni Koran points to the fact that the Muslim holy book has undergone a textual evolution. Give us your view of the meaning and significance here. Spencer: Moorthy is quite right: the idea that the Koran is perfect and uncreated, with no textual variants, is central to Islamic proselytizing. The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) says the Koran was memorized by Muhammad and then dictated to his companions. The text of the Quran was cross-checked during the life of the Prophet. The 114 chapters of the Quran have remained unchanged through the centuries. This idea is also central to the worldview of jihadist groups. Osama bin Laden bragged in his 2002 letter to the American people that the Koran will remain preserved and unchanged, after the other Divine books and messages have been changed. The Quran is the miracle until the Day of Judgment.
The textual variants in the Yemeni Koran, simply by showing that the text is not always and everywhere the same, explode the mainstream Islamic belief that the Koran was delivered in perfect form to Muhammad through the angel Gabriel, and has always been miraculously preserved from variant readings.
Yet oddly enough, early Islamic traditions recorded in the Hadith assume the existence of variant readings of the Koran. The impetus for collecting Muhammads revelations into a single volume came after Muhammad and other important early Muslims started dying off. Late in the year Muhammad died, 632, a group of Arab tribes that Muhammad had conquered and brought into the Muslim fold revolted. The first caliph, Abu Bakr, led the Muslims into battle to subdue them.
The two sides met in the Battle of Yamama, in which some of the Muslims who had memorized segments of the Koran were killed. One Islamic tradition notes that many (of the passages) of the Quran that were sent down were known by those who died on the day of Yamama but they were not known (by those who) survived them, nor were they written down, nor had [the first three caliphs] Abu Bakr, Umar or Uthman (by that time) collected the Quran, nor were they found with even one (person) after them. Ibn Abi Dawud, Kitab al-Masahif )
The official compiler of the Koran, Zaid ibn Thabit, explained that he started locating Quranic material and collecting it from parchments, scapula, leaf-stalks of date palms and from the memories of men (who knew it by heart). I found with Khuzaima two Verses of Surat-at-Tauba which I had not found with anybody else. Zaids recollection testifies to the ad hoc nature of his work. For example, it was Khuzaima himself, Zaids sole source for the last two verses of sura 9, who approached Zaid and informed him of the omission: I see you have overlooked (two) verses and have not written them. When he had recited them, an influential companion of Muhammad and the future third caliph, Utman, declared, I bear witness that these verses are from Allah. And so they were included in the Koran (9:128-129).
Other sections of the Koran, some mandating stringent punishments for unbelievers and other violators of Islamic law, were lost altogether. One early Muslim declared, Let none of you say, I have acquired the whole of the Quran. How does he know what all of it is when much of the Quran has disappeared? Rather let him say I have acquired what has survived (As-Suyuti, Al-Itqan fii Ulum al-Quran ). Other Koranic verses dropped out of the text without replacement. One of these stated, The religion with Allah is al-Hanifiyyah (the Upright Way) rather than that of the Jews or the Christians, and those who do good will not go unrewarded. Al-Tirmidhi, the compiler of one of the six collections of Hadith, or Islamic traditions, that Muslims consider to be the most reliable, said that this verse was at one time part of sura 98. It is not found there, however, in Zaids canonical version.
FP: Moorthy Muthuswamy?
Muthuswamy: The importance of the Yemeni Koran is that it was an independent discovery; it physically exists and is distinct from the Islamic doctrines presently in use.
Political Islam faces ideological difficulties with the likes of the Sanaa fragments pointing to the textual evolution of the Koran. Furthermore, as Robert insightfully observes, other inconsistencies in the contemporary Koran and the Hadith accentuate these difficulties.
The challenge ahead lies in utilizing this breach to decisively break the back of Islamic radicalism.
Whether it is the latest, in the form of the Fort Hood massacre or the previous 9/11 attacks, there is one common theme: the armed jihads were carried out by mosque-going pious Muslim men who claimed to be driven by Islamic doctrines.
Recently, much progress has been achieved by applying statistical analysis to the Islamic doctrines themselves in order to understand why pious Muslims are waging jihad on unbelievers. Specifically, we now understand that about sixty-one percent of the contents of the Koran are found to speak ill of unbelievers or call for their violent conquest; at best only 2.6 percent of the verses of the Koran are noted to show goodwill toward humanity. Get this: about seventy five percent of Muhammads biography (Sira) consists of jihad waged on unbelievers.
While there might be some subjectivity to the above analysis, the overwhelming thrust of the inferences should be noted. Moreover, this overall thrust exposes the sheer absurdity of excusing the Koran-inspired terror on the so-called selective interpretation of the Muslim holy book or its verses being taken out of context.
Additionally, there is the shariathe so-called Islamic Law, legitimized by the Koran. The medieval sharia has stifled development and integration of Muslim communities, and has indirectly helped channel Muslim energies toward the outlet of jihad.
Let us discuss the evolution of Major Nidal Hasan, the Fort Hood jihadist. Consider a hypothetical scenario: the majority of the worshippers in the mosques Hasan attended believed that the Koran couldnt be taken literally; that that there are many mainstream Islamic sites that emphasized the textual evolution of the Muslim holy book. What would have happed? It is very unlikely that Hasan would have given the pro-jihad seminar (the precursor to the Fort Hood massacre) in Walter Reed Medical Center.
Unfortunately, reality is just the opposite. Saudi-funded Wahhabi ideologies that emphasize the literal interpretation of the Koran have played a longstanding role at grievously influencing most American mosque goers.
An April 2001 survey by CAIR found 69 percent of Muslims in America saying it is absolutely fundamental or very important to have Salafi (similar to radical Wahhabi Islamic ideology) teachings at their mosques (67 percent of respondents also expressed agreement with the statement America is an immoral, corrupt society). The Internet-based mainstream Islamic portals too, almost without exception, preach radical ideologies, backed by the Muslim holy book.
Based on the above analysis we can unequivocally state that the Koran, through its contents and their literal interpretations, acts as an albatross around the neck of Muslim communities. Yet, our national security policy in its various incarnations builds on the fundamentally flawed assumption that the Koran is a constructive element in the lives of Muslims.
The challenge of mitigating the radical Islamic threat indeed comes down to questioning the very basis that the Koran is the Word of God.
The Yemeni Koran, backed by Koranic inconsistencies might provide a fresh impetus in this direction.
FP: Robert Spencer, final thoughts?
Spencer: Moorthy is right. PowerPoint slides on which Hasan proposed to show what the Koran inculcates in the minds of Muslims and the potential implications this may have for the U.S. military have come to light. The implications are many, and important.
Hasan makes the case that Muslims must not fight against other Muslims (as is mandated by Koran 4:92), and that the Koran also mandates both defensive and offensive jihad against unbelievers, in order to impose upon those unbelievers the hegemony of Islamic law. He quotes the Koranic verse calling for war against the People of the Book (that is, mainly Jews and Christians) until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of [Islamic] superiority and they are in a state of subjection (9:29).
Hasan seems then to have been telling the assembled (and no doubt stunned) physicians that Muslims had a religious obligation to make war against and subjugate non-Muslims as inferiors under their rule. But surely that is extremist Islam, no? No. Imran Ahsan Khan Nyazee, Assistant Professor on the Faculty of Shariah and Law of the International Islamic University in Islamabad, in a book on Islamic law explains that Muslim jurists agreed that the purpose of fighting with the People of the Book is one of two things: it is either their conversion to Islam or the payment of jizyah. (Jizyah is the tax referred to in Koran 9:29.)
Nyazee concludes: This leaves no doubt that the primary goal of the Muslim community, in the eyes of its jurists, is to spread the word of Allah through jihad, and the option of poll-tax [jizya] is to be exercised only after subjugation of non-Muslims.
Likewise Majid Khadduri, an internationally renowned Iraqi scholar of Islamic law, explained in his 1955 book War and Peace in the Law of Islam that the Islamic state, whose principal function was to put Gods law into practice, sought to establish Islam as the dominant reigning ideology over the entire world .The jihad was therefore employed as an instrument for both the universalization of religion and the establishment of an imperial world state.
And Irans Ayatollah Khomeini put it this way: Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not disabled or incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of [other] countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world .But those who study Islamic Holy War will understand why Islam wants to conquer the whole world .There are hundreds of other [Quranic] psalms and Hadiths [sayings of the Prophet] urging Muslims to value war and to fight. Does all this mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war? I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim.
Hasans Islam also coincides with that of the jihad terror group Hamas, which has announced its intention, once fully and firmly ensconced in power, to collect that Koranic tax jizyah from the non-Muslims luckless enough to live within its domains. Hasan would also no doubt find heads nodding in agreement with his explanation of Islam among the Muslim Brotherhood, the international Islamic organization (which operates under a variety of names in the United States) that is dedicated in its own words to a grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Gods religion is made victorious over all other religions.
No one in government or law enforcement has ever made any attempt to determine how prevalent such understandings of Islam are among Muslims in the United States. But if they are not Nidal Hasans eccentricities, but indeed mainstream views of Islam, it would be of cardinal importance for those sworn to protect us to begin making such an attempt now. The lives of innocent people depend on it. As Moorthy explained, the Yemeni Koran could help provide a way.
FP: Moorthy Muthuswamy and Robert Spencer, thank you for joining Frontpage Interview.
Excellent read! Thanks for finding/posting this article. Will forward.
once fully and firmly ensconced in power, to collect that Koranic tax jizyah from the non-Muslims luckless enough to live within its domains .............................. Not in my life time, come collect a tax from me and you will meet “My Leeetle friend”.
Thanks to Glazov, Spencer and Muthuswamy! Thanks for posting, SJackson.
This would be meaningful if the Muslims adhered to human logic. They don’t.
At the same time they blame the Jews for 9/11 and love Osama for 9/11.
Congress alone would lead one to accept this view, throw in the Senate and Obama and his gang and it'd be hard to arrive at another conclusion.
Note: this topic is from 12/14/2009. Thanks SJackson.the Birmingham Koran keyword:
This is an invaluable article, pointing to the inherently flawed nature of the fundamentals underlying Mohammedanism.
Moreover, it gives great insight into how our policy makers (along with most in the West/Europe) act in such a misguided fashion in dealing with this endemic threat to our way of life. Perhaps the most telling line in the whole article:
"Based on the above analysis we can unequivocally state that the Koran, through its contents and their literal interpretations, acts as an albatross around the neck of Muslim communities. Yet, our national security policy in its various incarnations builds on the fundamentally flawed assumption that the Koran is a constructive element in the lives of Muslims."
The sooner we can get it through their heads that there is no good that can come of this murderous cult, the better.