Skip to comments.
CPAC keeps GOProud, loses other sponsor (Liberty Law School Withdraws Sponsorship)
One News Now ^
| 01-13-10
| Jim Brown
Posted on 01/13/2010 9:43:02 AM PST by icwhatudo
Liberty University Law School has withdrawn as a co-sponsor of next month's Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington because a Republican homosexual activist group is being allowed to co-sponsor the event.
---snip----
Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin recently rejected an invitation from David Keene to speak at CPAC. According to a source close to Palin, the event is a forum that will put "special interests over core beliefs" and "pocketbook over policy."
(Excerpt) Read more at onenewsnow.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cpac; cpac2010; fudgepac; homosexualagenda; libertyu; rinopac
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
To: eleni121
I don’t have some specific insider knowledge unfortunately, but I guarantee they are trying very hard to get in, right now.
21
posted on
01/13/2010 11:09:01 AM PST
by
chuck_the_tv_out
( <<< click my name: now featuring Freeper classifieds)
To: icwhatudo
...a repeal of the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy...
And what would be wrong with that? Soldiers should be judged on their behaviour while on duty and their ability to follow orders, not on the fact that they let slip that they stay with a boyfriend while on leave.
Simply use the same rules that heterosexual soldiers have to follow with regard to female soldiers and apply them (i.e. the army is not a dating service, other soldiers aren't there for amusement purposes). Whoever can't comply is out.
DADT is just hate-crime legislation in reverse (in that you single out a group for what they are or think and make up special rules instead of having the same set of rules for everyone and jugde everyone by his or her actual transgressions), both are moronic. Typically left-wing identity politics.
22
posted on
01/13/2010 11:12:58 AM PST
by
wolf78
(Inflation is a form of taxation, too. Cranky Libertarian - equal opportunity offender.)
To: icwhatudo
Just a thought.
One way to destroy any org is to infiltrate and cause dissension
23
posted on
01/13/2010 11:13:00 AM PST
by
Marty62
(former Marty60)
To: wolf78
No fags and no fag blood need to be mixing with our GIs.
24
posted on
01/13/2010 11:33:12 AM PST
by
ansel12
(anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
To: icwhatudo
"One issue I want to clarify concerns President Clintons dont ask, dont tell, dont pursue military policy. I believe that the Clinton compromise was a step in the right direction. I am also convinced that it is the first of a number of steps that will ultimately lead to gays and lesbians being able to serve openly and honestly in our nations military. That goal will only be reached when preventing discrimination against gays and lesbians is a mainstream concern, which is a goal we share."
Sincerely, W. Mitt Romney (and my five light in the loafers, sons)
25
posted on
01/13/2010 11:37:53 AM PST
by
ansel12
(anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
To: MSF BU
MONEY!
It has been that way for years as conservatives swallowed the Koolaid of Keene and CPAC. Remember how he allowed Romney high school kids to cast votes for President even though they would not be voting. Romney bused in kids from high school and college and paid for their straw poll ballots which is why I kept saying on here any straw poll at CPAC was bogus. It was only a matter of time until the real truth about the ‘conservative’ Keene came out.
26
posted on
01/13/2010 12:07:17 PM PST
by
PhiKapMom
(Mary Fallin - OK Gov/Rick Perry - TX Gov/Coburn/Rubio - Senate 2010 !)
To: ansel12
No fags and no fag blood need to be mixing with our GIs.
But DADT doesn't keep gays from serving in the military. In fact it explicitly says that gays can serve as long as they don't tell. The only thing it does is forbid telling, which can either be used to screw the military (e.g. let the military pay for your medical training and then say you're gay) or to screw the soldier (e.g. ignore his or her homosexuality for years and then discharge him before he becomes eligible for benefits).
The irony is: Being HIV-positive while straight is not necessarily a reason for a discharge, whereas saying you're gay is.
It's the same absurd thinking as with hate crime legislation. As if it were something different if I shot a gay guy for fun. Of course it's wrong. BUT NOT because the guy is gay. It's because you don't shoot people for fun. Everything else follows from that.
27
posted on
01/13/2010 12:47:04 PM PST
by
wolf78
(Inflation is a form of taxation, too. Cranky Libertarian - equal opportunity offender.)
To: wolf78
DADT by the left was a smoke screen that means a few fags can get into the military as long as they can hide it well enough that lazy or liberal commanders can ignore the knowledge that they are homosexual.
Clinton was wrong to do it, I don’t know which branch you were in or if your military job showed you just how intimate soldiering can be, (try two naked men in one sleeping bag), but the mixing of blood and contact is pretty extraordinary. Homosexuals are a disruptive and unnecessary attack by the left, against the military.
28
posted on
01/13/2010 1:02:30 PM PST
by
ansel12
(anti SoCon. Earl Warren's court 1953-1969, libertarian hero, anti social conservative loser.)
To: PhiKapMom
I missed the Keane/Fed Ex thing mentioned by others and did some research. Apparently it was a big reason why Palin turned down CPAC:
"At issue is the role of David Keene, head of the American Conservative Union which organizes CPAC. In September, POLITICO reported that Keene asked FedEx for between $2 million and $3 million to get the group's support in a bitter legislative battle with rival UPS.
A source close to the Palin camp says that request led to a decision to stay away from the upcoming CPAC conference, calling it a forum that will place "special interests over core beliefs" and "pocketbook over policy."
"That's not what CPAC should be about and people are tiring," the source said. "Palin is taking a stance against this just as she did in Alaska."
When asked about the move, Palin spokeswoman Meg Stapleton said: "We support those who advance our core beliefs and lead by principle."
Linky
29
posted on
01/13/2010 1:04:53 PM PST
by
icwhatudo
("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the existing Constitution"Obama Adviser)
To: icwhatudo
Hilarious video of CPAC's Keane getting hammered by John Ziegler about Palin attacks, support for Arlen Specter, and the Fed Ex thing. Keane calls John Ziegler an a-hole and threatens to hit him.
Link
30
posted on
01/13/2010 1:09:31 PM PST
by
icwhatudo
("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the existing Constitution"Obama Adviser)
To: icwhatudo
Where are the “conservative” defenders of cpac now?
31
posted on
01/13/2010 3:57:58 PM PST
by
HANG THE EXPENSE
(Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
To: DaveLoneRanger
32
posted on
01/13/2010 4:00:44 PM PST
by
HANG THE EXPENSE
(Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
To: imahawk
33
posted on
01/13/2010 4:08:58 PM PST
by
icwhatudo
("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the existing Constitution"Obama Adviser)
To: wolf78
Spoken like someone never in the service.You’re uninformed is the nicest way I can put it.
34
posted on
01/13/2010 4:09:21 PM PST
by
HANG THE EXPENSE
(Life is tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
To: MSF BU
This is yet another infiltration attempt by queers who want to keep their tax money instead of forking it over to the gubmint. But they’d rather hang onto their money by promoting a political party that is sympathetic to individuals hanging onto their money AND also thinks sticking your whang in some guy’s poop chute for funsies and parading down public streets, in front of kids and old people, wearing nothing except a three-foot plastic dildo attached to a thong, plastic leopard stiletto boots and a pink feather boa is perfectly fine.
35
posted on
01/13/2010 6:16:53 PM PST
by
chilltherats
(First, kill all the lawyers (now that they ARE the tyrants).......)
To: wolf78; icwhatudo
wolf, if you Brits like queers in your military so much, you can take ALL of ours.
We don’t intend for our military to be another leftist social experiment or, worse, an infiltration of people with behaviors that deliberately undermine the strength of the organization.
I happen to think “Don’t ask, don’t tell” is pretty generous. If queers really just want to serve and have no ulterior motive, they should be fine with the policy.
36
posted on
01/13/2010 6:36:27 PM PST
by
chilltherats
(First, kill all the lawyers (now that they ARE the tyrants).......)
To: Finny
37
posted on
01/14/2010 1:00:11 AM PST
by
Finny
("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent.)
To: mollylucy
Beck lost my support with that rant. I’m beginning to see him as just another professional huckster in search of a buck.
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
...a Republican homosexual activist group is being allowed to co-sponsor the event...
39
posted on
01/14/2010 5:25:17 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Happy New Year! Freedom is Priceless.)
To: Jim Robinson
40
posted on
02/05/2010 10:37:36 AM PST
by
CondoleezzaProtege
("When I survey the wondrous cross...")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson